Literature DB >> 32569055

Optimizing Reconstruction in Craniosynostosis: Review of Nonsyndromic Patients Treated With a Novel Technique.

Hayeem L Rudy1, Sean Herman2, Carrie S Stern3, David A Staffenberg4, Kamilah Dowling5, James T Goodrich5, Oren M Tepper1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Open cranial vault remodeling (CVR) with autologous split calvarial bone grafts redistributes and recontours an abnormal calvarium to create an expanded cranial vault in patients with craniosynostosis. We report a 12-year retrospective review of 162 nonsyndromic patients who underwent operative repair using our previously-described technique which portends excellent surgical outcomes and can be applied to patients of any age group and with any variety of suture fusion.
METHODS: Data was gathered on patients who underwent CVR from 2005 to 2016. Surgical records for each patient were analyzed and included operative time, estimated blood loss, and intraoperative transfusion volumes. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, the need for revision surgery, postoperative length of stay, and follow-up records were also reviewed. Syndromic patients were excluded, as well as patients with incomplete data sets. Patients who underwent either anterior or posterior vault remodeling were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 162 patients were included in this case series. Patients undergoing anterior CVR were significantly older than those undergoing posterior CVR (13.3 versus 11.0 months, P < 0.015) and also had significantly greater intraoperative red blood transfusion volumes (20.3 versus 15.3cc/kg, P < 0.0207) and longer operative time than posterior CVR patients (274.9 versus 216.7 minutes, P < 0.0001). No patients required reoperation for resorption or recurrence or persistent contour irregularities. There were no visual or neurological complications. Calvarial bone was successfully split in 100% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: This surgical approach to CVR results in good surgical outcomes with a low recurrence rate, while also maximizing operative efficiency, and minimizing total blood loss and transfusion volume. This technique can be applied to any affected suture in a patient with craniosynostosis and in patients of any age group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32569055      PMCID: PMC9357343          DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.172


  28 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic technique for sagittal synostosis.

Authors:  David F Jimenez; Constance M Barone
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 2. The role of an osseous connected cellular network.

Authors:  M L Moss
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth.

Authors:  M L Moss; L Salentijn
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1969-06

4.  Long-term outcomes of primary craniofacial reconstruction for craniosynostosis: a 12-year experience.

Authors:  Mitchel Seruya; Albert K Oh; Michael J Boyajian; Jeffrey C Posnick; John S Myseros; Amanda L Yaun; Robert F Keating
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Craniosynostosis: posterior two-third cranial vault reconstruction using bioresorbable plates and a PDS suture lattice in sagittal and lambdoid synostosis.

Authors:  James Tait Goodrich; Oren Tepper; David A Staffenberg
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Long-Term Outcomes of Pediatric Cranial Reconstruction Using Resorbable Plating Systems for the Treatment of Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Leslie G Branch; Clayton Crantford; Teresa Cunningham; Gaurav Bharti; James Thompson; Dan Couture; Lisa R David
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 7.  Operative Management of Nonsyndromic Sagittal Synostosis: A Head-to-Head Meta-analysis of Outcomes Comparing 3 Techniques.

Authors:  Patrick A Gerety; Marten N Basta; John P Fischer; Jesse A Taylor
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Split-thickness bone grafts in complex craniofacial reconstructions.

Authors:  J T Goodrich; R Argamaso; C D Hall
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.162

9.  Early management of craniosynostosis using endoscopic-assisted strip craniectomies and cranial orthotic molding therapy.

Authors:  David F Jimenez; Constance M Barone; Cathy C Cartwright; Lynette Baker
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Pediatric craniofacial surgery for craniosynostosis: Our experience and current concepts: Part -1.

Authors:  Y N Anantheswar; N K Venkataramana
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2009-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical Applications of Poly-Methyl-Methacrylate in Neurosurgery: The In Vivo Cranial Bone Reconstruction.

Authors:  Tomaz Velnar; Roman Bosnjak; Lidija Gradisnik
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-09-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.