Literature DB >> 32569027

Aerosol generation through phacoemulsification.

Hanbin Lee1, Hasan Naveed, Zahra Ashena, Mayank A Nanavaty.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether phacoemulsification is an aerosol-generating procedure in an ex vivo experimental model.
SETTING: Sussex Eye Hospital, Brighton, United Kingdom.
DESIGN: Experimental study.
METHODS: In this ex vivo study on 15 porcine eyes, an optical particle counter was used to measure particles of 10 µm and less using the cumulative mode based on the 6 in-built channel sizes. The 2 parts of the study were to: (1) assess the efficacy of the particle counter in the theater environment where there are dynamic changes in temperature and humidity; and (2) to measure aerosol generation with 3 phacoemulsification settings: (i) continuous power with 80% longitudinal (5 eyes); (ii) continuous power with 100% torsional (5 eyes); and (iii) continuous power with 80% longitudinal with application of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) on the ocular surface (5 eyes). Five measurements were taken prephacoemulsification and 5 during phacoemulsification per eye therefore totaling 75 measurements.
RESULTS: Maximum aerosols were captured when the counter faced the aerosol source. There was no significant difference in aerosol generation of all sizes during each phacoemulsification setting with torsional, longitudinal, and longitudinal with HPMC (P > .01). Combining data of all 3 phacoemulsification settings (150 measurements from 15 eyes), there was no significant difference comparing prephacoemulsification and during phacoemulsification for aerosols of 5 µm or less (1455 vs 1363.85, P = .60), more than 5 to 10 μm (1.5 vs 1.03, P = .43), and of 10 µm or less (1209 vs 1131.55, P = .60).
CONCLUSIONS: Phacoemulsification did not generate aerosols of 10 μm or less with continuous power using 80% longitudinal, 100% torsional, and 80% longitudinal setting with HPMC on the surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32569027     DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  4 in total

1.  Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on elective cataract surgeries.

Authors:  Marcelo Tannous; Renata Leonel Freire Mendes; Ana Vega Carreiro de Freitas; Andressa Miranda Magalhães; Rogério Ferrari; Bruno Luiz Miolo; Milton Ruiz Alves; Amaryllis Avakian; Pedro Carlos Carricondo
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-05-06

2.  Presence of SARS-CoV-2 Viral RNA in Aqueous Humor of Asymptomatic Individuals.

Authors:  Ellen H Koo; Allen O Eghrari; Daliya Dzhaber; Amar Shah; Elizabeth Fout; Sander Dubovy; Jorge Maestre-Mesa; Darlene Miller
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Aerosolization and Fluid Spillage During Phacoemulsification in Human Subjects.

Authors:  Jasper Ka Wai Wong; Jeremy Sze Wai John Kwok; Jonathan Cheuk Hung Chan; Kendrick Co Shih; Renyuan Qin; Denvid Lau; Jimmy Shiu Ming Lai
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-27

Review 4.  Novel Insights into the Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Through the Ocular Surface and its Detection in Tears and Conjunctival Secretions: A Review.

Authors:  Noemi Güemes-Villahoz; Barbara Burgos-Blasco; Beatriz Vidal-Villegas; Julián Garcia-Feijoo; Pedro Arriola-Villalobos; Jose María Martínez-de-la-Casa; David Diaz-Valle; Anastasios G Konstas
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.845

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.