Literature DB >> 32568852

Childbearing Decisions in Residency: A Multicenter Survey of Female Residents.

Shobha W Stack1, Reshma Jagsi2, J Sybil Biermann3, Gina P Lundberg4, Karen L Law5, Caroline K Milne6, Sigrid G Williams7, Tracy C Burton8, Cindy L Larison9, Jennifer A Best10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize how female residents make decisions about childbearing, factors associated with the decision to delay childbearing, and satisfaction with these decisions.
METHOD: In 2017, the authors sent a voluntary, anonymous survey to 1,537 female residents enrolled across 78 graduate medical education programs, consisting of 25 unique specialties, at 6 U.S. academic medical centers. Survey items included personal, partner, and institutional characteristics, whether the respondent was delaying childbearing during residency, and the respondent's satisfaction with this decision.
RESULTS: The survey response rate was 52% (n = 804). Among the 447 (56%) respondents who were married or partnered, 274 (61%) were delaying childbearing. Residents delaying childbearing were significantly more likely to be younger (P < .001), not currently a parent (P < .001), in a specialty with an uncontrollable lifestyle (P = .001), or in a large program (P = .004). Among self-reported reasons for delaying childbearing, which were not mutually exclusive, the majority cited a busy work schedule (n = 255; 93%) and desire not to extend residency training (n = 145; 53%). Many cited lack of access to childcare (n = 126; 46%), financial concerns (n = 116; 42%), fear of burdening colleagues (n = 96; 35%), and concern for pregnancy complications (n = 74; 27%). Only 38% (n = 103) of respondents delaying childbearing were satisfied with this decision, with satisfaction decreasing with increasing age.
CONCLUSIONS: Decisions to delay childbearing are more common in certain specialties, and many residents who delay childbearing are not satisfied with that decision. These findings suggest that greater attention is needed overall, and particularly in certain specialties, to promote policies and cultures that both anticipate and normalize parenthood in residency, thus minimizing the conflict between biological and professional choices for female residents.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32568852     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  5 in total

1.  Knowledge of Fertility and Perspectives About Family Planning Among Female Physicians.

Authors:  Kathryn S Smith; Jennifer B Bakkensen; Anne P Hutchinson; Elaine O Cheung; Jessica Thomas; Veronika Grote; Patricia I Moreno; Kara N Goldman; Neil Jordan; Eve C Feinberg
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 2.  Pregnancy in physicians: A scoping review.

Authors:  Marianne Casilla-Lennon; Stephanie Hanchuk; Sijin Zheng; David D Kim; Benjamin Press; Justin V Nguyen; Alyssa Grimshaw; Michael S Leapman; Jaime A Cavallo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Fellowship program directors and trainees across the United States find parental leave policies to be inconsistent, inaccessible, and inadequate.

Authors:  Daniel Sabido Jamorabo; Amrin Khander; Vasilios Koulouris; Jeremy Eli Feith; William Matthew Briggs; Benjamin Dwight Renelus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Supporting Our Parent-Trainees: Exploring Curricular and Cultural Challenges That Limit the Utilization of Parental Leave by Residents.

Authors:  Alexander G Cole; Mary E Camp
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-28

5.  The Effect of COVID-19 on the Medical School Experience, Specialty Selection, and Career Choice: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Cassandre R Krier; Katherine Quinn; Kristina Kaljo; Amy H Farkas; Elizabeth H Ellinas
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.524

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.