| Literature DB >> 32568714 |
Abstract
Has the rise of data-intensive science, or 'big data', revolutionized our ability to predict? Does it imply a new priority for prediction over causal understanding, and a diminished role for theory and human experts? I examine four important cases where prediction is desirable: political elections, the weather, GDP, and the results of interventions suggested by economic experiments. These cases suggest caution. Although big data methods are indeed very useful sometimes, in this paper's cases they improve predictions either limitedly or not at all, and their prospects of doing so in the future are limited too. CrownEntities:
Keywords: Big data; Case studies; Elections; Explanation; Prediction; Weather
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 32568714 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.09.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stud Hist Philos Sci ISSN: 0039-3681 Impact factor: 1.429