Literature DB >> 32568644

Assessing the Predictive Validity of Simple Dementia Risk Models in Harmonized Stroke Cohorts.

Eugene Y H Tang1, Christopher I Price1, Louise Robinson1, Catherine Exley1, David W Desmond, Sebastian Köhler2, Julie Staals3, Bonnie Yin Ka Lam4, Adrian Wong4, Vincent Mok4, Regis Bordet5, Anne-Marie Bordet5, Thibaut Dondaine5, Jessica W Lo6, Perminder S Sachdev6,7, Blossom C M Stephan8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Stroke is associated with an increased risk of dementia. To assist in the early identification of individuals at high risk of future dementia, numerous prediction models have been developed for use in the general population. However, it is not known whether such models also provide accurate predictions among stroke patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether existing dementia risk prediction models that were developed for use in the general population can also be applied to individuals with a history of stroke to predict poststroke dementia with equivalent predictive validity.
METHODS: Data were harmonized from 4 stroke studies (follow-up range, ≈12-18 months poststroke) from Hong Kong, the United States, the Netherlands, and France. Regression analysis was used to test 3 risk prediction models: the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia score, the Australian National University Alzheimer Disease Risk Index, and the Brief Dementia Screening Indicator. Model performance or discrimination accuracy was assessed using the C statistic or area under the curve. Calibration was tested using the Grønnesby and Borgan and the goodness-of-fit tests.
RESULTS: The predictive accuracy of the models varied but was generally low compared with the original development cohorts, with the Australian National University Alzheimer Disease Risk Index (C-statistic, 0.66) and the Brief Dementia Screening Indicator (C-statistic, 0.61) both performing better than the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia score (area under the curve, 0.53).
CONCLUSIONS: Dementia risk prediction models developed for the general population do not perform well in individuals with stroke. Their poor performance could have been due to the need for additional or different predictors related to stroke and vascular risk factors or methodological differences across studies (eg, length of follow-up, age distribution). Future work is needed to develop simple and cost-effective risk prediction models specific to poststroke dementia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; dementia; follow-up studies; risk factors; risk prediction

Year:  2020        PMID: 32568644     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.027473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  3 in total

1.  Personalized Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological Assessment of Patients with Left and Right Hemispheric Damage in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Anastasia Tynterova; Svetlana Perepelitsa; Arкady Golubev
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 2.  Modifiable risk factors for dementia and dementia risk profiling. A user manual for Brain Health Services-part 2 of 6.

Authors:  Janice M Ranson; Timothy Rittman; Shabina Hayat; Carol Brayne; Frank Jessen; Kaj Blennow; Cornelia van Duijn; Frederik Barkhof; Eugene Tang; Catherine J Mummery; Blossom C M Stephan; Daniele Altomare; Giovanni B Frisoni; Federica Ribaldi; José Luis Molinuevo; Philip Scheltens; David J Llewellyn
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 6.982

Review 3.  Surface electroencephalography (EEG) during the acute phase of stroke to assist with diagnosis and prediction of prognosis: a scoping review.

Authors:  Lou Sutcliffe; Hannah Lumley; Lisa Shaw; Richard Francis; Christopher I Price
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-02-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.