BACKGROUND: Staging of a bone sarcoma before initiating treatment helps orthopaedic oncologists determine the intent of treatment and predicting the prognosis. As per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, there are no exclusive recommendations for chondrosarcoma staging. They are staged similar to other bone sarcomas even though skeletal metastases are extremely rare in chondrosarcomas. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) What proportion of patients with a chondrosarcoma present with detectable only skeletal metastasis? (2) What proportion of patients with chondrosarcoma present with skeletal metastasis with or without concurrent pulmonary metastases? METHODS: Between January 2006 to December 2017, 480 patients with histology-proven chondrosarcomas of the extremity, including clavicle, scapula, spine, and pelvis, presented to our institute. Fifty-three patients were excluded due to incomplete details about their staging. The remaining 427 were retrospectively analyzed and included in this study. Their clinical, radiological, and histopathological details were retrieved from patient files and electronic medical records. Of the 427 patients included, 53 had Grade 1 chondrosarcoma, 330 had Grade 2 chondrosarcoma, and 41 had Grade 3 chondrosarcoma. Grade was not available in three patients. All patients were staged with a thoracic CT scan and bone scan or a whole body fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/CT (FDG PET/CT). Patients with a suspected or documented metastasis were reviewed again by an experienced radiologist and a nuclear medicine expert for the purpose of this study. A total of 8% (35 of 427) of patients with chondrosarcoma had isolated lung metastases at the time of initial staging. These included 9% (31 of 330) of patients with Grade 2 chondrosarcomas and 10% (4 of 41) of patients with Grade 3 chondrosarcomas. No patient with a Grade 1 chondrosarcoma had detectable lung metastases. The primary study endpoint was the number of patients who had a diagnosis of skeletal or skeletal and lung metastases as identified by the staging modalities. RESULTS: Three patients with Grade 2 chondrosarcoma had only skeletal metastasis. No patients with Grade 1 or Grade 3 chondrosarcoma had detectable bone metastases. Combined lung and bone metastases were seen in only two patients with Grade 2 chondrosarcoma. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that the incidence of bony metastasis in conventional chondrosarcomas is extremely low. Considering the present results, we believe skeletal scanning may be overused in current staging algorithms. We do not have survival outcomes to know if detecting these few patients with skeletal lesions at initial presentation would be important in the absence of symptoms, but our data suggest that omitting skeletal imaging from the staging work-up of conventional chondrosarcomas should be considered. It may be reserved for patients with documented pulmonary metastases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, diagnostic study.
BACKGROUND: Staging of a bone sarcoma before initiating treatment helps orthopaedic oncologists determine the intent of treatment and predicting the prognosis. As per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, there are no exclusive recommendations for chondrosarcoma staging. They are staged similar to other bone sarcomas even though skeletal metastases are extremely rare in chondrosarcomas. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) What proportion of patients with a chondrosarcoma present with detectable only skeletal metastasis? (2) What proportion of patients with chondrosarcoma present with skeletal metastasis with or without concurrent pulmonary metastases? METHODS: Between January 2006 to December 2017, 480 patients with histology-proven chondrosarcomas of the extremity, including clavicle, scapula, spine, and pelvis, presented to our institute. Fifty-three patients were excluded due to incomplete details about their staging. The remaining 427 were retrospectively analyzed and included in this study. Their clinical, radiological, and histopathological details were retrieved from patient files and electronic medical records. Of the 427 patients included, 53 had Grade 1 chondrosarcoma, 330 had Grade 2 chondrosarcoma, and 41 had Grade 3 chondrosarcoma. Grade was not available in three patients. All patients were staged with a thoracic CT scan and bone scan or a whole body fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/CT (FDG PET/CT). Patients with a suspected or documented metastasis were reviewed again by an experienced radiologist and a nuclear medicine expert for the purpose of this study. A total of 8% (35 of 427) of patients with chondrosarcoma had isolated lung metastases at the time of initial staging. These included 9% (31 of 330) of patients with Grade 2 chondrosarcomas and 10% (4 of 41) of patients with Grade 3 chondrosarcomas. No patient with a Grade 1 chondrosarcoma had detectable lung metastases. The primary study endpoint was the number of patients who had a diagnosis of skeletal or skeletal and lung metastases as identified by the staging modalities. RESULTS: Three patients with Grade 2 chondrosarcoma had only skeletal metastasis. No patients with Grade 1 or Grade 3 chondrosarcoma had detectable bone metastases. Combined lung and bone metastases were seen in only two patients with Grade 2 chondrosarcoma. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that the incidence of bony metastasis in conventional chondrosarcomas is extremely low. Considering the present results, we believe skeletal scanning may be overused in current staging algorithms. We do not have survival outcomes to know if detecting these few patients with skeletal lesions at initial presentation would be important in the absence of symptoms, but our data suggest that omitting skeletal imaging from the staging work-up of conventional chondrosarcomas should be considered. It may be reserved for patients with documented pulmonary metastases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, diagnostic study.
Authors: J Sybil Biermann; Warren Chow; Damon R Reed; David Lucas; Douglas R Adkins; Mark Agulnik; Robert S Benjamin; Brian Brigman; G Thomas Budd; William T Curry; Aarati Didwania; Nicola Fabbri; Francis J Hornicek; Joseph B Kuechle; Dieter Lindskog; Joel Mayerson; Sean V McGarry; Lynn Million; Carol D Morris; Sujana Movva; Richard J O'Donnell; R Lor Randall; Peter Rose; Victor M Santana; Robert L Satcher; Herbert Schwartz; Herrick J Siegel; Katherine Thornton; Victor Villalobos; Mary Anne Bergman; Jillian L Scavone Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Najat C Daw; Catherine A Billups; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; M Beth McCarville; Bhaskar N Rao; Alvida M Cain; Jesse J Jenkins; Michael D Neel; William H Meyer Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ömer Kasalak; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Jelle Overbosch; Paul C Jutte; Thomas C Kwee Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 2.199