Daniel M Goldenholz1,2, Shira R Goldenholz1, Juan Romero1,2, Rob Moss3, Haoqi Sun2,4, Brandon Westover2,4. 1. Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Seizure Tracker, Springfield, Virginia, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There are no validated methods for predicting the timing of seizures. Using machine learning, we sought to forecast 24-hour risk of self-reported seizure from e-diaries. METHODS: Data from 5,419 patients on SeizureTracker.com (including seizure count, type, and duration) were split into training (3,806 patients/1,665,215 patient-days) and testing (1,613 patients/549,588 patient-days) sets with no overlapping patients. An artificial intelligence (AI) program, consisting of recurrent networks followed by a multilayer perceptron ("deep learning" model), was trained to produce risk forecasts. Forecasts were made from a sliding window of 3-month diary history for each day of each patient's diary. After training, the model parameters were held constant and the testing set was scored. A rate-matched random (RMR) forecast was compared to the AI. Comparisons were made using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), a measure of binary discrimination performance, and the Brier score, a measure of forecast calibration. The Brier skill score (BSS) measured the improvement of the AI Brier score compared to the benchmark RMR Brier score. Confidence intervals (CIs) on performance statistics were obtained via bootstrapping. RESULTS: The AUC was 0.86 (95% CI = 0.85-0.88) for AI and 0.83 (95% CI = 0.81-0.85) for RMR, favoring AI (p < 0.001). Overall (all patients combined), BSS was 0.27 (95% CI = 0.23-0.31), also favoring AI (p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: The AI produced a valid forecast superior to a chance forecaster, and provided meaningful forecasts in the majority of patients. Future studies will be needed to quantify the clinical value of these forecasts for patients. ANN NEUROL 2020;88:588-595.
OBJECTIVE: There are no validated methods for predicting the timing of seizures. Using machine learning, we sought to forecast 24-hour risk of self-reported seizure from e-diaries. METHODS: Data from 5,419 patients on SeizureTracker.com (including seizure count, type, and duration) were split into training (3,806 patients/1,665,215 patient-days) and testing (1,613 patients/549,588 patient-days) sets with no overlapping patients. An artificial intelligence (AI) program, consisting of recurrent networks followed by a multilayer perceptron ("deep learning" model), was trained to produce risk forecasts. Forecasts were made from a sliding window of 3-month diary history for each day of each patient's diary. After training, the model parameters were held constant and the testing set was scored. A rate-matched random (RMR) forecast was compared to the AI. Comparisons were made using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), a measure of binary discrimination performance, and the Brier score, a measure of forecast calibration. The Brier skill score (BSS) measured the improvement of the AI Brier score compared to the benchmark RMR Brier score. Confidence intervals (CIs) on performance statistics were obtained via bootstrapping. RESULTS: The AUC was 0.86 (95% CI = 0.85-0.88) for AI and 0.83 (95% CI = 0.81-0.85) for RMR, favoring AI (p < 0.001). Overall (all patients combined), BSS was 0.27 (95% CI = 0.23-0.31), also favoring AI (p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: The AI produced a valid forecast superior to a chance forecaster, and provided meaningful forecasts in the majority of patients. Future studies will be needed to quantify the clinical value of these forecasts for patients. ANN NEUROL 2020;88:588-595.
Authors: Daniel M Goldenholz; Shira R Goldenholz; Robert Moss; Jacqueline French; Daniel Lowenstein; Ruben Kuzniecky; Sheryl Haut; Sabrina Cristofaro; Kamil Detyniecki; John Hixson; Philippa Karoly; Mark Cook; Alex Strashny; William H Theodore; Carl Pieper Journal: Epilepsy Res Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Michael Privitera; Sheryl R Haut; Richard B Lipton; James S McGinley; Susannah Cornes Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M Winterhalder; T Maiwald; H U Voss; R Aschenbrenner-Scheibe; J Timmer; A Schulze-Bonhage Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: Karel G M Moons; Douglas G Altman; Johannes B Reitsma; John P A Ioannidis; Petra Macaskill; Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; David F Ransohoff; Gary S Collins Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Daniel M Goldenholz; Shira R Goldenholz; Robert Moss; Jacqueline French; Daniel Lowenstein; Ruben Kuzniecky; Sheryl Haut; Sabrina Cristofaro; Kamil Detyniecki; John Hixson; Philippa Karoly; Mark Cook; Alex Strashny; William H Theodore Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 4.511
Authors: Philippa J Karoly; Dean R Freestone; Dominique Eden; Rachel E Stirling; Lyra Li; Pedro F Vianna; Matias I Maturana; Wendyl J D'Souza; Mark J Cook; Mark P Richardson; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Ewan S Nurse Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-08-04 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Sharon Chiang; Robert Moss; Angela P Black; Michele Jackson; Chuck Moss; Jonathan Bidwell; Christian Meisel; Tobias Loddenkemper Journal: JAMIA Open Date: 2021-03-01
Authors: Philippa J Karoly; Vikram R Rao; Maxime O Baud; Nicholas M Gregg; Gregory A Worrell; Christophe Bernard; Mark J Cook Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Benjamin H Brinkmann; Philippa J Karoly; Ewan S Nurse; Sonya B Dumanis; Mona Nasseri; Pedro F Viana; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Dean R Freestone; Greg Worrell; Mark P Richardson; Mark J Cook Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Sharon Chiang; Rosalind W Picard; Winston Chiong; Robert Moss; Gregory A Worrell; Vikram R Rao; Daniel M Goldenholz Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-07-27 Impact factor: 11.800
Authors: Rachel E Stirling; David B Grayden; Wendyl D'Souza; Mark J Cook; Ewan Nurse; Dean R Freestone; Daniel E Payne; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Tal Pal Attia; Pedro F Viana; Mark P Richardson; Philippa J Karoly Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 4.003