Literature DB >> 3256770

Detection of target phonemes in spontaneous and read speech.

G Mehta, A Cutler.   

Abstract

Although spontaneous speech occurs more frequently in most listeners' experience than read speech, laboratory studies of human speech recognition typically use carefully controlled materials read from a script. The phonological and prosodic characteristics of spontaneous and read speech differ considerably, however, which suggests that laboratory results may not generalise to the recognition of spontaneous speech. In the present study listeners were presented with both spontaneous and read speech materials, and their response time to detect word-initial target phonemes was measured. Responses were, overall, equally fast in each speech mode. However, analysis of effects previously reported in phoneme detection studies revealed significant differences between speech modes. In read speech but not in spontaneous speech, later targets were detected more rapidly than targets preceded by short words. In contrast, in spontaneous speech but not in read speech, targets were detected more rapidly in accented than in unaccented words and in strong than in weak syllables. An explanation for this pattern is offered in terms of characteristic prosodic differences between spontaneous and read speech. The results support claims from previous work that listeners pay great attention to prosodic information in the process of recognising speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3256770     DOI: 10.1177/002383098803100203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  11 in total

1.  Lexical, syntactic, and stress-pattern cues for speech segmentation.

Authors:  L D Sanders; H J Neville
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2.  Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: a review and theoretical interpretation.

Authors:  S A Duffy; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1992 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Using automatic alignment to analyze endangered language data: testing the viability of untrained alignment.

Authors:  Christian DiCanio; Hosung Nam; Douglas H Whalen; H Timothy Bunnell; Jonathan D Amith; Rey Castillo García
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  English Listeners Use Suprasegmental Cues to Lexical Stress Early During Spoken-Word Recognition.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; Katja Poellmann; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Stress Judgment and Production in English Derivation, and Word Reading in Adult Mandarin-Speaking English Learners.

Authors:  Wei-Lun Chung; Linda Jarmulowicz
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-08

6.  Mandarin-speaking preschoolers' pitch discrimination, prosodic and phonological awareness, and their relation to receptive vocabulary and reading abilities.

Authors:  Wei-Lun Chung; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2020-07-20

7.  Cross-linguistic contributions of acoustic cues and prosodic awareness to first and second language vocabulary knowledge.

Authors:  Wei-Lun Chung; Linda Jarmulowicz; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  J Res Read       Date:  2021-01-05

8.  Why um helps auditory word recognition: the temporal delay hypothesis.

Authors:  Martin Corley; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impaired extraction of speech rhythm from temporal modulation patterns in speech in developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Victoria Leong; Usha Goswami
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Segmentation cues in conversational speech: robust semantics and fragile phonotactics.

Authors:  Laurence White; Sven L Mattys; Lukas Wiget
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.