INTRODUCTION: In January 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Italy necessitated rigorous application of more restrictive safety procedures in the management and treatment of patients with cancer to ensure patient and staff protection. Identification of respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was a challenge during the pandemic owing to a large number of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients. METHODS: We report 5 patients with unknown SARS-CoV-2 infection undergoing positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) with radiopharmaceuticals targeting different tumor processes: 18F-FDG, 18F-choline (FCH), and 68Ga-PSMA. RESULTS: In all patients, PET/CT showed increased tracer uptake in the lungs corresponding to CT findings of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Quantitative assessment of tracer uptake showed more elevated values for the glucose analogue 18F-FDG (mean SUVmax 5.4) than for the other tracers (mean SUVmax 3.5). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that PET/CT is a sensitive modality to hypothesize SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in patients with cancer, even when asymptomatic. More data are needed to verify the correlation among immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, clinical evolution, and PET results. Under the strict safety measures implemented at the PET center, the number of potentially SARS-CoV-2-positive patients undergoing PET/CT was very low (1.6%), and no staff member has been diagnosed with infection as of April 30, 2020.
INTRODUCTION: In January 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Italy necessitated rigorous application of more restrictive safety procedures in the management and treatment of patients with cancer to ensure patient and staff protection. Identification of respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was a challenge during the pandemic owing to a large number of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients. METHODS: We report 5 patients with unknown SARS-CoV-2 infection undergoing positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) with radiopharmaceuticals targeting different tumor processes: 18F-FDG, 18F-choline (FCH), and 68Ga-PSMA. RESULTS: In all patients, PET/CT showed increased tracer uptake in the lungs corresponding to CT findings of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Quantitative assessment of tracer uptake showed more elevated values for the glucose analogue 18F-FDG (mean SUVmax 5.4) than for the other tracers (mean SUVmax 3.5). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that PET/CT is a sensitive modality to hypothesize SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in patients with cancer, even when asymptomatic. More data are needed to verify the correlation among immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, clinical evolution, and PET results. Under the strict safety measures implemented at the PET center, the number of potentially SARS-CoV-2-positive patients undergoing PET/CT was very low (1.6%), and no staff member has been diagnosed with infection as of April 30, 2020.
In January 2020, an outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
occurred in Italy (https://www.iss.it/en/coronavirus), with striking speed of virus
transmission and rapid increase in patient numbers (https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/news-events/ecdc-statement-rapid-increase-covid-19-cases-italy).
Diagnostic departments were engaged in facing the pandemic with chest radiography
and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) to assess the presence of pneumonia
in patients with respiratory symptoms. In this context, management of diagnostic
sessions for patients with cancer required rigorous application of safety procedures
with more restrictions compared to routine activity in order to guarantee patient
and staff protection.Identification of patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) appeared early as a challenge of the pandemic, owing to
the lack of serologic tests and the absence of testing for infection in the home
setting. On the other hand, patients with positive chest computed tomography (CT)
findings may have negative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
testing for SARS-CoV-2.[1,2]Detection of suspected cases is critical in patients with cancer before they visit
the positron emission tomography (PET) center, because they are particularly
susceptible to respiratory pathogens owing to potential immunosuppressive state and
antitumor therapy.Correct management of a PET session presents many difficulties because of the
coexistence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and patients with mild symptoms
before the PET scan (https://www.sirm.org/2020/03/30/covid-19-caso-69/), mostly not
tested on RT-PCR, but variably presenting with chest CT findings compatible with
pulmonary interstitial infiltrates, potentially associated with infection or
drug-related reactions.In this study, we report 5 patients (Table 1) with unknown SARS-CoV-2 infection
undergoing PET/CT scan for restaging breast and prostate cancer (patients 1, 3, 4),
characterization of lung nodule (patient 2), and focal splenic lesions (patient
5).
Table 1.
Characteristics of all patients.
Clinical history
Patient 1
Patient 2
Patient 3
Patient 4
Patient 5
Solid lung nodule
Breast intraductal cancer
Prostate cancer
Prostate cancer
Splenic lesion
PET indication
Characterization
Yes
—
—
—
Yes
Staging
—
—
—
Yes
—
Restaging
—
Yes
Yes
—
—
PET tracer
18F-FDG
18F-FDG
68Ga-PSMA
18F-choline
18F-FDG
PET: positron emission tomography.
Characteristics of all patients.PET: positron emission tomography.
PET/CT imaging protocol
In all cases, PET/CT images were acquired on an integrated 3D PET/CT scanner
(Discovery IQ; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI). For PET scanning with
18F-FDG, patients fasted for over 6 hours and had blood sugar level
<160 mg/dL before intravenous tracer injection.Whole body PET/CT protocol included a topogram to define the field of view (FOV)
established according to the tracer or the cancer type, followed by a low-dose CT
scan (120 kV, 140 mA, pitch 1, collimation 16 × 1.25) for attenuation correction and
anatomical correlation and a PET emission scan (1.5 minutes per bed position for
F-18 tracers, 3 min/bed for Ga-68, 512 × 512 matrix size).Acquired data were reconstructed by Q Clear (GE Healthcare), a Bayesian
penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm (strength 350).Images were corrected for injected dose, tracer decay, body weight, and attenuation
using the low-dose CT scan. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.Review and analysis of attenuation-corrected PET and CT images were performed using
an Advantage Workstation 4.6 (GE Healthcare).Quantitative assessment of tracer uptake was performed by drawing volume of interest
(VOI) over areas with abnormally high increases in uptake, focal and/or
well-circumscribed.Standardized uptake value (SUV) was calculated as the ratio of decay-corrected
activity in the VOI to the injected activity per unit body weight, as a simplified
measure of tracer uptake.The SUVmax was calculated as the hottest voxel within the VOI.PET/CT characteristics of all patients are reported in Table 2.
PET/CT features of all patients.CT: computed tomography; GGO: ground-glass opacities; PET: positron
emission tomography.Quantitative analysis of PET images is reported in Tables 3 and 4.
Table 3.
FDG-PET quantitative assessment of tracer uptake.
Patient 1
Patient 2
Patient 5
Lung SUVmax
2.6
9.1
4.6
LN SUVmax
2.5
7
2.5
LN: lymph node; PET: positron emission tomography; SUV: standardized
uptake value; SUVmax: the hottest voxel within the volume of
interest.
Table 4.
68Ga-PSMA and choline PET quantitative assessment of tracer
uptake.
Patient 3 (68Ga-PSMA)
Patient 4 (choline)
Lung SUVmax
3.2
3.8
LN SUVmax
—
3.4
LN: lymph node; PET: positron emission tomography; SUV: standardized
uptake value; SUVmax: the hottest voxel within the volume of
interest.
FDG-PET quantitative assessment of tracer uptake.LN: lymph node; PET: positron emission tomography; SUV: standardized
uptake value; SUVmax: the hottest voxel within the volume of
interest.68Ga-PSMA and choline PET quantitative assessment of tracer
uptake.LN: lymph node; PET: positron emission tomography; SUV: standardized
uptake value; SUVmax: the hottest voxel within the volume of
interest.
Patient 1 (March 5, 2020)
A PET/CT scan with 18F-FDG (GLUSCAN®; AAA, Meldola, FC, IT) was
performed to characterize a solid lung nodule (1 cm diameter) revealed by a previous
CT scan 1 month previously in an 80-year-old man. The examination was performed 60
minutes after intravenous tracer injection (263 MBq) from scull base to the pelvis.
Increased tracer uptake was detected corresponding to subpleural ground-glass
opacities (GGOs) on CT images (Figure 1) in the superior segment of the left superior lobe (SUVmax 2.6)
with bronchovascular thickening (Figure 1[c]) showing mild tracer uptake (SUVmax 2.5). Active tracer
uptake was also present in right hilar lymph nodes (SUVmax 2.5).
Figure 1.
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-FDG to
characterize a solid lung nodule in an 80-year-old man.
Increased uptake of 18F-FDG (arrows) in subpleural ground-glass
opacities of the left lung in the axial (a) and coronal (b) sections with
bronchovascular thickening showing mild tracer uptake (c).
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-FDG to
characterize a solid lung nodule in an 80-year-old man.Increased uptake of 18F-FDG (arrows) in subpleural ground-glass
opacities of the left lung in the axial (a) and coronal (b) sections with
bronchovascular thickening showing mild tracer uptake (c).The patient, living in a small mountain village, was home-quarantined, but neither
swab nor antibodies testing for SARS-CoV-2 was performed. Several weeks later, he
underwent lung HRCT, confirming the findings revealed by PET/CT.
Patient 2 (March 6, 2020)
A 57-year-old woman with a history of intraductal cancer (IDC) was referred for PET
for restaging due to appearance of a suspicious nodule in the left breast.The patient previously (2017) underwent breast-conserving surgery for IDC located in
the upper-outer quadrant of the left breast. Follow-up ultrasonography revealed a
hypoechoic area (1 cm diameter) near the surgical scar (June 2019); mammography was
negative. Fine-needle aspiration of the lesion with ultrasound assistance classified
it as benign (C2).In February 2020, the patient underwent tomosynthesis with evidence of benign
alterations (American College of Radiology 2) and absence of microcalcifications or
skin alteration suspected of cancer. Ultrasound confirmed the hypoechoic nodule
having unchanged size. PET/CT scan with 18F-FDG (GLUSCAN®) was
performed 60 minutes after tracer injection (257 MBq) from vertex to knees for
restaging breast cancer.Focal tracer uptake (SUVmax 6.5) was detected in the solid nodule of the left breast.
Intense and diffuse uptake was revealed in both lungs corresponding to GGOs on CT
images (Figure 2; also see
the maximum intensity projection in Supplementary Figure 1).
Figure 2.
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-FDG to
restage breast cancer in a 57-year-old woman.
Increased uptake of 18F-FDG (white arrows) in subpleural
ground-glass opacities of both lungs in the axial (a, b) and coronal (c)
sections. Tracer uptake in the carinal (c) and mediastinal (d) lymph nodes
due to infection (yellow arrows). Focal tracer uptake in the left breast
corresponds to the suspected nodule (d; green arrow). Note: The colour
version of the figure is available online.
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-FDG to
restage breast cancer in a 57-year-old woman.Increased uptake of 18F-FDG (white arrows) in subpleural
ground-glass opacities of both lungs in the axial (a, b) and coronal (c)
sections. Tracer uptake in the carinal (c) and mediastinal (d) lymph nodes
due to infection (yellow arrows). Focal tracer uptake in the left breast
corresponds to the suspected nodule (d; green arrow). Note: The colour
version of the figure is available online.CT characteristics were typical of COVID-19 pneumonia as described by Xie et al.[1] Tracer uptake was present in all parenchymal alterations with different
intensity (SUVmax range in the right lung, 2.2–7.7; SUVmax range in the left lung,
2.7–9.1).The highest SUV values were measured in the subpleural GGO areas; otherwise, low
uptake values were revealed in the isolated lesions in the parenchyma. High
intensity of tracer uptake present in mediastinal, hilar, and carinal lymph nodes
refer to infection (SUVmax 7).The patient was referred to the dedicated COVID-19 protocol at the University
Hospital of Parma and subsequently home-quarantined because she did not show any
symptoms. Her general practitioner was alerted for peripheral management of the
patient and organization of pharyngeal swab for testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The swab was not performed, but the patient underwent a rapid diagnostic test for
SARS-CoV-2 antibodies from a finger prick, which resulted positive for
immunoglobulin G (IgG).
Patient 3 (March 24, 2020)
A 65-year-old man had previously undergone radical prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma
Gleason Score 7 (4+3). During follow-up, his prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value
slowly increased, with an actual value of 0.47 ng/mL, leading to a need to restage
prostate cancer with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT.The radiopharmaceutical was prepared in our radiopharmacy laboratory as described previously[3] according to current European Union Good Manufacturing Practices,[4] current Good Radiopharmacy Practice,[5] and European Pharmacopoeia. Dynamic images over the pelvis were acquired soon
after intravenous tracer injection (142 MBq). Whole-body scan was performed after an
uptake time of 60 minutes from vertex to knee. PET/CT was negative for cancer
lesions but revealed mild tracer uptake (SUVmax 3.2) in the subpleural region of
both lungs, with greater extent in the right lung, corresponding to CT findings of
subpleural GGOs in the dependent lung (Figure 3). Subsequently, the patient
underwent pharyngeal swab testing, which was positive. After symptoms disappearance,
another swab was performed, resulting negative. Several weeks later, the patient’s
wife presented symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection (cough, fever, diffuse myalgia),
treated with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, not requiring hospitalization. She
is awaiting serologic testing.
Figure 3.
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 68Ga-PSMA to
restage prostate cancer (Gleason Score 7, prostate-specific antigen 0.4
ng/mL) in a 65-year-old man who previously had radical prostatectomy.
Increased uptake of 68Ga-PSMA in areas of ground-glass opacities
(arrows) in the posterior segments of both lungs. Axial coronal (a, b, c)
and sagittal (d) sections are shown.
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 68Ga-PSMA to
restage prostate cancer (Gleason Score 7, prostate-specific antigen 0.4
ng/mL) in a 65-year-old man who previously had radical prostatectomy.Increased uptake of 68Ga-PSMA in areas of ground-glass opacities
(arrows) in the posterior segments of both lungs. Axial coronal (a, b, c)
and sagittal (d) sections are shown.
Patient 4 (March 25, 2020)
A 70-year-old man previously underwent standard prostate mapping due to PSA value
increase (last value 7.4 ng/mL). Adenocarcinoma of the prostate was demonstrated in
9/12 mapping samples with a Gleason Score 7 (3+4).A PET/CT scan with 18F-choline (IASOcholine®; IASON GmbH, Graz,
Austria) was performed for staging. Dynamic images of the pelvis were acquired soon
after intravenous tracer injection (278 MBq). The whole-body scan was performed 60
minutes after intravenous tracer injection from scull base to mid-thighs.PET/CT showed double focal intense uptake in the prostate gland. Mild uptake of the
tracer was revealed in the subpleural region of both lungs, with greater extent in
the right lung, corresponding to CT findings of GGOs and consolidation areas (Figure 4). Focal tracer uptake
(SUVmax 3.8) was detected in a single GGO localized in the middle lobe of the right
lung and in a hilar, carinal, and peribronchial lymph node (SUVmax 3.4) (see
Supplementary Figure 2).
Figure 4.
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-choline
to stage prostate cancer (Gleason Score 7, prostate-specific antigen 7.4
ng/mL) in a 70-year-old man.
Increased uptake of 18F-choline (arrows) in peripheral
ground-glass and consolidative opacities (a, b, c, d) in both lungs (major
extent in the right lower lobe).
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-choline
to stage prostate cancer (Gleason Score 7, prostate-specific antigen 7.4
ng/mL) in a 70-year-old man.Increased uptake of 18F-choline (arrows) in peripheral
ground-glass and consolidative opacities (a, b, c, d) in both lungs (major
extent in the right lower lobe).The patient’s general practitioner was alerted for peripheral management and
organization of pharyngeal swab testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The patient was
home-quarantined but swab was not performed by decision of the Health Department. He
recently underwent laboratory-based serologic testing, which was positive for IgG
antibodies to SARS-CoV-2.
Patient 5 (March 26, 2020)
A 57-year-old woman underwent PET/CT with 18F-FDG (GLUSCAN®) to
characterize three focal splenic lesions (diameter 8–10 mm) with inconclusive CT and
contrast-enhanced ultrasound. The examination was performed 60 minutes after
intravenous tracer injection from skull base to pelvis. PET/CT did not show any
tracer uptake in the spleen but revealed intense/moderate uptake in the bilateral
subpleural regions (SUVmax 4.6 in the right lung, SUVmax 3.7 in the left lung)
corresponding to CT findings of GGOs in the posterior segments, with obvious extent
in the right lung (see Supplementary Figure 3).The patient developed mild respiratory symptoms a few weeks later; she was
quarantined and recently underwent thoracic radiography, which was normal.
Discussion and conclusion
To our knowledge, this is the first report of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with
cancer detected by PET/CT using different tracers according to tumor type.In a 1-month period (March 2020), we performed 302 PET/CT examinations for patients
with cancer. Five patients (1.6 %) undergoing PET/CT revealed PET manifestations
corresponding to CT findings suspicious for SARS-CoV-2 infection. All of them were
asymptomatic on the day of PET/CT scan; one of them (case 4) questioned after the
examination reported a mild fever 3 weeks previously.In Figures 5 and 6, activity of the PET center
during the outbreak is reported compared to previous years (for 2020, activity was
measured until April 30).
Figure 5.
Total positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)
examinations in the first trimester (years 2016–2020) at the PET Center of
the University Hospital of Parma.
Figure 6.
Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) examinations per
month for patients with cancer (data collected until April 30 for 2020).
Total positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)
examinations in the first trimester (years 2016–2020) at the PET Center of
the University Hospital of Parma.Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) examinations per
month for patients with cancer (data collected until April 30 for 2020).Patient 3 was from Codogno, the first red zone area for SARS-CoV-2 infection in Italy
(https://www.escardio.org/Education/COVID-19-and-Cardiology/diagnosing-the-first-covid-19-patient-in-italy-codogno).
He presented symptoms (ageusia, cough) immediately after the identification of the
man known in Italy as Patient No. 1.[6] After disappearance of symptoms, he underwent pharyngeal swab testing for
SARS-CoV-2 infection, which resulted negative. A second swab was not performed. Some
weeks later, the patient’s wife presented symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection. She is
now awaiting serologic testing. Most patients (patients 1, 2, 4, 5) home-quarantined
after PET scan, awaiting swab testing, but it was performed only in one case
(patient 3), due to the lack of symptoms. However, recent implementation of
serologic testing has allowed confirmation of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in two
cases (patients 2 and 4).Our findings suggest that PET/CT is a sensitive modality to demonstrate the presence
of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in patients with cancer, even in asymptomatic
individuals.Persistence of tracer uptake many weeks after symptoms disappearance (patient 3) may
be explained by the presence of inflammatory cells accumulating 18F-FDG
(neutrophils, activated macrophages, and lymphocytes) at the site of infection,
without excluding active disease. In inflamed tissue, glycolysis is enhanced[7] with an upregulation of GLUT transporters, with amplified affinity for their
substrates as glucose analogue 18F-FDG.Specific infections, such as human immunodeficiency virus, cytomegalovirus, or dengue
virus, may lead to increased expression of GLUT transporters in infected
cells,[8-10] with a parallel rise in FDG
accumulation.[8-10] However, in
our patients, tracers targeting different metabolic process, such as membrane
biosynthesis (18F-choline) or the overexpression of transmembrane
glycoprotein (68Ga-PSMA), showed moderate to intense uptake in the
typical COVID-19 pneumonia.Increased regional blood flow at the site of infection/inflammation may increase
availability of PSMA ligand. Additionally, folate receptors overexpressed by
activated macrophages may interfere with the expression of folate hydrolase/PSMA.[11] FCH accumulation in inflammatory tissue may be due to upregulation of choline
kinase in the activated macrophages.[12]More data are needed to verify the correlation among immune response to SARS-CoV-2
infection, clinical evolution, and PET results; patient 3 had negative swab after
symptom disappearance but positive PET examination for bilateral subpleural GGOs,
and his wife later developed symptoms of COVID-19.In our cases, different types of serologic testing were used, such as rapid
diagnostic test in patient 2 and laboratory-based test in patient 4, allowing us to
establish a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. More homogeneous management of pharyngeal
swab and serologic testing could help infection tracing, especially in the
vulnerable population of patients with cancer with PET/CT findings suspicious for
SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.Recent case series about PET in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia showed high
18F-FDG uptake in lung lesions accompanied by nodal involvement
detectable on PET/CT images.[13] Incidental findings of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic patients with
cancer undergoing nuclear medicine procedures was recently reported using hybrid
scanner single-photon emission CT/CT[14] and PET/CT.[14,15]The PET tracer used was the glucose analogue 18F-FDG in all the reported
cases. We have shown that different radiopharmaceuticals, used according to tumor
type, may be taken up by SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. In our cases, quantitative assessment
of 18F-FDG uptake was higher in the parenchymal lesions than in the
accompanying nodal involvement. The SUVmax values of 18F-FDG were more
elevated compared to the other tracers (mean value 5.4 vs 3.5) assessed previously
in preclinical experiments.[12]These preliminary data show prolonged metabolic activity in the typical lung lesions
of SARS-CoV-2 infection, remaining many weeks after symptoms disappearance or
negative swab (patient 3), suggesting a potential role of PET/CT in monitoring
treatment efficacy and disease resolution. We hypothesize that quantitative results
of tracer uptake measured by SUV may be referred to infection timing, with higher
SUVs in the initial phase of pulmonary involvement (patient 2).Under the strict protective measures implemented at the PET Center, the number of
potentially SARS-CoV-2–positive patients undergoing PET/CT was very low, and no
staff member has been diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection as of April 30, 2020, as
confirmed by negative results of serology testing (immunoglobulin M and IgG) for
SARS-CoV-2, performed at the beginning of May, in all staff members.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental material, Supplemental_figures_1 for Unknown SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia
detected by PET/CT in patients with cancer by Maura Scarlattei, Giorgio Baldari,
Mario Silva, Stefano Bola, Antonino Sammartano, Silvia Migliari, Tiziano
Graziani, Carla Cidda, Nicola Sverzellati and Livia Ruffini in Tumori
JournalClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, Supplemental_figures_2 for Unknown SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia
detected by PET/CT in patients with cancer by Maura Scarlattei, Giorgio Baldari,
Mario Silva, Stefano Bola, Antonino Sammartano, Silvia Migliari, Tiziano
Graziani, Carla Cidda, Nicola Sverzellati and Livia Ruffini in Tumori
JournalClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, Supplemental_figures_3 for Unknown SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia
detected by PET/CT in patients with cancer by Maura Scarlattei, Giorgio Baldari,
Mario Silva, Stefano Bola, Antonino Sammartano, Silvia Migliari, Tiziano
Graziani, Carla Cidda, Nicola Sverzellati and Livia Ruffini in Tumori
Journal
Authors: L R Sorbara; F Maldarelli; G Chamoun; B Schilling; S Chokekijcahi; L Staudt; H Mitsuya; I A Simpson; S L Zeichner Journal: J Virol Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Matthias T Wyss; Bruno Weber; Michael Honer; Nicolas Späth; Simon M Ametamey; Gerrit Westera; Beata Bode; Achim H Kaim; Alfred Buck Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-11-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Eva María Triviño-Ibáñez; Beatriz María Jiménez-Rodríguez; Teodoro Rudolphi-Solero; Encarnación Yolanda García-Rivero; Antonio Rodríguez-Fernández; José Manuel Llamas-Elvira; Manuel Gómez-Río; Concepción Morales-García Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-03-29
Authors: Salvatore Annunziata; Roberto C Delgado Bolton; Christel-Hermann Kamani; John O Prior; Domenico Albano; Francesco Bertagna; Giorgio Treglia Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2020-11-10