INTRODUCTION: Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children, but accounts for only 1% of brain cancers in adults. For standard-risk pediatric medulloblastoma, current therapy includes craniospinal irradiation (CSI) at reduced doses (23.4 Gy) associated with chemotherapy. Whereas most same-stage adult patients are still given CSI at 36 Gy, with or without chemotherapy, we report here on our use of reduced-dose CSI associated with chemotherapy for older patients. METHODS: We gathered non-metastatic patients over 18 years old (median age 28 years, range 18-48) with minimal or no residual disease after surgery, no negative histological subtypes, treated between 1996-2018 at the Centre Léon Bérard (Lyon) and the INT (Milano). A series of 54 children with similar tumors treated in Milano was used for comparison. RESULTS: Forty-four adults were considered (median follow-up 101 months): 36 had 23.4 Gy of CSI, and 8 had 30.6 Gy, plus a boost to the posterior fossa/tumor bed; 43 had chemotherapy as all 54 children, who had a median 83-month follow-up. The PFS and OS were 82.2 ± 6.1% and 89 ± 5.2% at 5 years, and 78.5 ± 6.9% and 75.2 ± 7.8% at ten, not significantly different from those of the children. CSI doses higher than 23.4 Gy did not influence PFS. Female adult patients tended to have a better outcome than males. CONCLUSION: The results obtained in our combined series are comparable with, or even better than those obtained after high CSI doses, underscoring the need to reconsider this treatment in adults.
INTRODUCTION:Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children, but accounts for only 1% of brain cancers in adults. For standard-risk pediatric medulloblastoma, current therapy includes craniospinal irradiation (CSI) at reduced doses (23.4 Gy) associated with chemotherapy. Whereas most same-stage adult patients are still given CSI at 36 Gy, with or without chemotherapy, we report here on our use of reduced-dose CSI associated with chemotherapy for older patients. METHODS: We gathered non-metastatic patients over 18 years old (median age 28 years, range 18-48) with minimal or no residual disease after surgery, no negative histological subtypes, treated between 1996-2018 at the Centre Léon Bérard (Lyon) and the INT (Milano). A series of 54 children with similar tumors treated in Milano was used for comparison. RESULTS: Forty-four adults were considered (median follow-up 101 months): 36 had 23.4 Gy of CSI, and 8 had 30.6 Gy, plus a boost to the posterior fossa/tumor bed; 43 had chemotherapy as all 54 children, who had a median 83-month follow-up. The PFS and OS were 82.2 ± 6.1% and 89 ± 5.2% at 5 years, and 78.5 ± 6.9% and 75.2 ± 7.8% at ten, not significantly different from those of the children. CSI doses higher than 23.4 Gy did not influence PFS. Female adult patients tended to have a better outcome than males. CONCLUSION: The results obtained in our combined series are comparable with, or even better than those obtained after high CSI doses, underscoring the need to reconsider this treatment in adults.
Authors: Marc Remke; Thomas Hielscher; Paul A Northcott; Hendrik Witt; Marina Ryzhova; Andrea Wittmann; Axel Benner; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfram Scheurlen; Arie Perry; Sidney Croul; Andreas E Kulozik; Peter Lichter; Michael D Taylor; Stefan M Pfister; Andrey Korshunov Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Paul A Northcott; Giles W Robinson; Christian P Kratz; Donald J Mabbott; Scott L Pomeroy; Steven C Clifford; Stefan Rutkowski; David W Ellison; David Malkin; Michael D Taylor; Amar Gajjar; Stefan M Pfister Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Banu Atalar; Mahmut Ozsahin; Jason Call; Aleksandra Napieralska; Serra Kamer; Salvador Villa; Petek Erpolat; Laura Negretti; Yasmin Lassen-Ramshad; Cem Onal; Serap Akyurek; Gamze Ugurluer; Brigitta G Baumert; Stephanie Servagi-Vernat; Robert C Miller; Enis Ozyar; Terence T Sio Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: J C Gentet; E Bouffet; F Doz; P Tron; H Roche; A Thyss; D Plantaz; J L Stephan; C Mottolese; D Ponvert Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: C Carrie; C Lasset; C Alapetite; C Haie-Meder; S Hoffstetter; M C Demaille; C Kerr; J P Wagner; J L Lagrange; J P Maire Journal: Cancer Date: 1994-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Benjamin H Kann; Nataniel H Lester-Coll; Henry S Park; Debra N Yeboa; Jacqueline R Kelly; Joachim M Baehring; Kevin P Becker; James B Yu; Ranjit S Bindra; Kenneth B Roberts Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Brian De; Kathryn Beal; Kevin C De Braganca; Mark M Souweidane; Ira J Dunkel; Yasmin Khakoo; Stephen W Gilheeney; Lisa M DeAngelis; Paul Menzel; Suchit H Patel; Suzanne L Wolden Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Enrico Franceschi; Caterina Giannini; Julia Furtner; Kristian W Pajtler; Sofia Asioli; Raphael Guzman; Clemens Seidel; Lidia Gatto; Peter Hau Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Anita Mahajan; Helen Shih; Marta Penas-Prado; Keith Ligon; Kenneth Aldape; Leland S Hu; Ashlee R Loughan; Michael R Basso; Heather E Leeper; Brian V Nahed; Shannon L Stott; Susan Geyer; Caterina Giannini; Evanthia Galanis Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-01-14 Impact factor: 6.575