Outcomes of dura-splitting technique compared to conventional duraplasty technique in the treatment of adult Chiari I malformation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chiari malformation type I is a developmental abnormality with an array of surgical techniques introduced for the management of it. The most common technique is foramen magnum decompression with duraplasty. Dura-splitting technique as one of the non-dura-opening techniques is a less known procedure that spares the internal layer of the dura and can theoretically result in fewer complications compared to duraplasty. So, we performed a review of literature and meta-analysis on different clinical and radiological aspects of this technique and compared its outcomes to duraplasty. MOOSE guidelines were followed. A systematic search of three databases based on predefined search strategy and inclusion/exclusion criteria was performed. After quality assessment and data extraction by two authors, summarized data were presented in form of tables, and meta-analysis results were illustrated in forest plots. A review of 10 included studies consisting of 370 patients revealed significantly shorter operation duration and less intraoperative blood loss in the dura-splitting technique compared to duraplasty. Interestingly, there was no significant difference between these two techniques in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes. Overall complication rate and incidence of CSF-related complications or infections were significantly in favor of the dura-splitting technique. Dura-splitting technique can be considered as a safe and effective surgical procedure for Chiari I malformation with comparable outcomes and fewer complications compared to duraplasty, although this interpretation is derived from retrospective observational studies and lack of a prospective clinical trial is evident.