| Literature DB >> 32566277 |
Godfred Egbi1, Mary Glover-Amengor2, Margaret M Tohouenou3, Francis Zotor4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plant-based foods are staple diets and main micronutrient sources of most rural Ghanaian households. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of Amaranthus cruentus and Solanum macrocarpon leafy vegetable flour on micronutrient intake and nutritional status of rural Ghanaian school children.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32566277 PMCID: PMC7288204 DOI: 10.1155/2020/1015280
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Metab ISSN: 2090-0724
Background characteristics of participants by the study group.
| Characteristics | Intervention ( | Control ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age (years) | 7.3 ± 1.7 | 6.7 ± 1.8 | 0.081 |
|
| |||
| Sex | |||
| Males | 41.5 | 51.9 | 0.242 |
| Females | 58.5 | 47.1 | 0.176 |
|
| |||
| Anthropometry | |||
| Weight (Kg) | 23.0 ± 4.9 | 21.6 ± 3.9 | 0.088 |
| Height (cm) | 117.1 ± 11.3 | 120.6 ± 11.3 | 0.110 |
| WAZ-score | −0.731 ± 0.906 | −0.485 ± .989 | 0.189 |
| HAZ-score | −0.723 ± 1.149 | −0.592 ± 1.17 | 0.567 |
| WHZ-score | −0.121 ± 1.362 | −0.095 ± 1.41 | 0.398 |
| BMI-for-age | −0.388 ± 0.899 | −0.105 ± 0.908 | 0.113 |
|
| |||
| Malnutrition | |||
| All category | 34.0 | 41.2 | 0.051 |
| Stunting (%) | 13.2 | 17.6 | 0.530 |
| Wasting (%) | 11.3 | 15.7 | 0.084 |
| Thinness (%) | 5.7 | 3.9 | 0.381 |
| Overweight (%) | 3.8 | 2.0 | 0.681 |
| Obesity (%) | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.068 |
|
| |||
| Anaemia | |||
| All category | 41.5 | 37.3 | 0.055 |
| Mild | 32.1 | 33.3 | 0.998 |
| Moderate | 9.4 | 3.9 | 0.051 |
|
| |||
| Low vitamin A level | |||
| All category | 66.0 | 64.7 | 0.087 |
| Mildly low | 26.4 | 27.5 | 0.995 |
| Moderately low | 24.5 | 17.7 | 0.053 |
| Severely low | 15.1 | 19.6 | 0.087 |
|
| |||
| Infection status | |||
| Malaria parasitaemia (%) | 34.0 | 37.3 | 0.726 |
|
| |||
| Guardian's age (years) | |||
| 20–60 | 100.0 | 98.0 | 0.474 |
| ≥61 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.197 |
|
| |||
| Daily food consumption pattern | |||
| Twice | 1.9 | 0.0 | 0.199 |
| ≥thrice | 98.1 | 100.0 | 0.344 |
|
| |||
| Parental monthly income $ (GH¢) | |||
| ≤$178 (GHȻ499) | 96.2 | 92.2 | 0.371 |
| ≥$178 (GHȻ500) | 3.8 | 7.8 | 0.237 |
|
| |||
| Food taboos | |||
| Yes | 72.5 | 64.2 | 0.362 |
| No | 27.5 | 35.8 | 0.334 |
|
| |||
| Parental education | |||
| Formal education | 96.2 | 94.1 | 0.712 |
| No formal education | 3.8 | 5.9 | 0.891 |
|
| |||
| Household backyard garden | |||
| Yes | 22 | 15.7 | 0.371 |
| No | 78 | 84.3 | 0.398 |
|
| |||
| Dietary diversity score | |||
| Low (≤3 food groups) | 15.0 | 13.7 | |
| Medium (4–5 food groups) | 71.7 | 76.5 | |
| High (≥6 food groups) | 13.2 | 9.8 | |
p values obtained by the independent t-test, otherwise chi-square test, are significant at p < 0.05.
Factors associated with anaemia in the study participants at baseline.
| Factor | Odds ratio | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Parental education status | |||
| At least secondary education | Reference [ | ||
| Basic education | 2.37 | 0.27–20.52 | 0.433 |
| No education | 1.57 | 0.47–5.28 | 0.468 |
|
| |||
| Parental occupation | |||
| Formal employment | Reference [ | ||
| Informal employment | 1.027 | 0.360–2.932 | 0.960 |
|
| |||
| Parental marital status | |||
| Single | Reference [ | ||
| Married | 2.50 | 0.16–3.02 | 0.511 |
|
| |||
| Parental monthly income | |||
| Monthly income (≥1000 cedis) | Reference [ | ||
| Monthly income (500–999 cedis) | 1.79 | 0.019–2.40 | 0.210 |
| Monthly income (1–499 cedis) | 1.95 | 0.221–0.86 | 0.039 |
|
| |||
| Participant's nutritional status | |||
| Normal retinol level (≥20 | Reference [ | ||
| Low retinol level (<20 | 1.68 | 0.10–0.99 | 0.049 |
| Normal (HAZ > −2 standard deviations | Reference [ | ||
| Stunted (HAZ ≤ −2 standard deviations | 1.59 | 0.13–2.64 | 0.491 |
|
| |||
| Participant's infection status | |||
| Malaria parasitaemia absent | Reference [ | ||
| Malaria parasitaemia present | 1.64 | 0.27–9.89 | 0.069 |
|
| |||
| Dietary intake | |||
| Adequate intake (≥DRI) | Reference [ | ||
| Inadequate iron intake (<DRI) | 2.32 | 0.48–3.63 | 0.052 |
| Inadequate fat intake (<DRI) | 1.03 | 0.99–1.07 | 0.127 |
| Inadequate protein intake (<DRI) | 1.23 | 0.13–8.67 | 0.431 |
|
| |||
| Gender | |||
| Boys | Reference [ | ||
| Girls | 2.58 | 0.94–7.08 | 0.920 |
|
| |||
| Age | 0.82 | 0.738 | |
p values are significant at p < 0.05. Binary logistic analysis was performed (Cox & Snell R Square = 0.186; Nagelkerke R Square = 0.248).
Composition of the stews and soups consumed by study participants.
| Nutrient composition of stews and soups/100 g as consumed | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stew/soup | Group | Moisture (%) | Ash (mg) | Protein (g) | Fat (g) | Iron (mg) | Zinc (mg) |
|
| Tomato stew | Control | 70.7 ± 0.2 | 30.1 ± 1.5 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 9.9 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 0.6 |
| Tomato + MGLVP stew | Intervention | 68.5 ± 0.4 | 32.3 ± 2.4 | 7.7 ± 0.1 | 10.1 ± 0.7 | 9.7 ± 0.1 | 7.8 ± 0.1 | 6.2 ± 0.5 |
| Bean stew | Control | 63.7 ± 1 | 15.5 ± 1.3 | 8.5 ± 1.7 | 10.0 ± 1.1 | 8.15 ± 1.1 | 4.3 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.3 |
| Bean + MGLVP stew | Intervention | 62.3 ± 2 | 17.2 ± 1.4 | 15.9 ± 1.4 | 12.1 ± 0.9 | 14.5 ± 1.3 | 8.1 ± 0.7 | 5.9 ± 0.7 |
| Ground nut soup | Control | 77.5 ± 1.2 | 21.3 ± 2.7 | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 15.1 ± 1.0 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.3 |
| Ground nut + MGVLP soup | Intervention | 72.2 ± 1.0 | 25.2 ± 1.9 | 10.9 ± 0.6 | 16.4 ± 0.9 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 5.1 ± 1.1 |
p values (except that for fat) obtained by one-way ANOVA are significant between control and corresponding intervention meals at p < 0.05. Data presented are from laboratory analysis.
Nutrient intake of study participants in comparison with Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) at baseline and end of the study.
| Nutrient | Study group |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Control | ||||
| Intake (mean ± SD) | Met DRI | Intake (mean ± SD) | Met DRI | ||
| Protein (g) | |||||
| Baseline | 32.7 ± 8.6 | 36 (67.9) | 32.2 ± 9.5 | 33 (64.7) | 0.793 |
| End line | 38.1 ± 9.1 | 45 (84.9) | 32.6 ± 9.2 | 31 (66.0) | 0.004 |
| | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.954 | 0.875 | |
|
| |||||
| Iron (mg) | |||||
| Baseline | 14.2 ± 7.1 | 32 (60.4) | 13.7 ± 6.1 | 32 (62.7) | 0.680 |
| End line | 24.1 ± 10.9 | 48 (90.6) | 14.8 ± 6.2 | 39 (83.0) | 0.001 |
| | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.433 | 0.006 | |
|
| |||||
| Beta-carotene ( | |||||
| Baseline | 215 ± 23 | 23 (43.4) | 211 ± 20 | 21 (41.2) | 0.065 |
| End line | 694 ± 33 | 50 (94.3) | 418 ± 35 | 28 (60.9) | 0.001 |
| | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.011 | |
|
| |||||
| Zinc (mg) | |||||
| Baseline | 5.7 ± 2.1 | 22 (41.5) | 5.4 ± 2.1 | 26 (51.0) | 0.538 |
| End line | 13.8 ± 8.2 | 45 (89.4) | 5.9 ± 2.3 | 25 (53.2) | 0.001 |
| | 0.001 | 0.03 | 0.185 | 0.231 | |
|
| |||||
| Vitamin C (mg) | |||||
| Baseline | 23.8 ± 3.8 | 11 (20.8) | 23.4 ± 4.7 | 10 (19.6) | 0.673 |
| End line | 24.2 ± 3.9 | 12 (22.6) | 24.±4.7 | 9 (19.1) | 0.287 |
| | 0.138 | 0.205 | 0.778 | 0.865 | |
|
| |||||
| Folic acid (mg) | |||||
| Baseline | 30.5 ± 17.0 | 0 (0) | 30.4 ± 12.2 | 0 (0) | 0.971 |
| End line | 30.7 ± 16.9 | 0 (0) | 30.8 ± 12.3 | 0 (0) | 0.816 |
| | 0.844 | — | 0.839 | — | |
p values within (across rows) and between (in most right column) study groups are significant at p < 0.05 by the paired and independent t-tests, respectively, otherwise by the chi-square test. The number of study participants at baseline was intervention = 53 and control = 51 and at end line was intervention = 53 and control = 47. Met DRI is the number (n) and percentage (%) of participants that met the various Recommended Nutrient Intakes. Nutrient intake was assessed by combination of 24-hour recall and direct food weighing (foods served at lunch break) (DRI source: National Research Council 1989, Recommended Dietary Allowances: 10th edition, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press (https://doi.org/10.17226/1349)).
Nutritional and infection status of study participants at the end of the study.
| Outcome variable | Intervention ( | Control ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Malnutrition | |||
| All category | 32.1 | 38.3 | 0.051 |
| Stunting (%) | 11.3 | 14.9 | 0.063 |
| Wasting (%) | 9.4 | 14.9 | 0.052 |
| Thinness (%) | 5.7 | 4.2 | 0.567 |
| Overweight (%) | 5.7 | 2.1 | 0.074 |
| Obesity (%) | 0.0 | 2.1 | 0.067 |
|
| |||
| Anaemia | |||
| All category (%) | 28.3 | 53.3 | 0.024 |
| Mild (%) | 24.5 | 46.8 | 0.022 |
| Moderate (%) | 3.8 | 4.3 | 0.791 |
|
| |||
| Low vitamin A | |||
| All category (%) | 20.8 | 23.4 | 0.059 |
| Mildly low | 20.8 | 17.0 | 0.055 |
| Moderately low (%) | 0.0 | 4.3 | 0.051 |
| Severely low (%) | 0.0 | 2.1 | 0.073 |
|
| |||
| Infection status | |||
| Malaria parasitaemia | 39.6 | 40.4 | 0.935 |
Using Pearson's chi-square test for categorical variables, statistical significance is set at p < 0.05. The number of study participants at end line was intervention group = 53 and control group = 47.
Food groups consumed by ≥50% of participants by the dietary diversity tertile at baseline and during the intervention study.
| Tertile | Food groups |
|---|---|
| Lowest dietary diversity (≤3 food groups) | Cereals |
| Medium dietary diversity (4–5 food groups) | Cereals, meat+, poultry+ and fish |
| High dietary diversity (≥6 food groups) | Cereals, roots and tubers, meat+, poultry+ and fish |
Most consumed food items in a food group. +Most scarcely consumed food items in a food group.