| Literature DB >> 32565963 |
Zhongjun Li1,2, Wenting Xuan1, Lishan Huang1, Niankun Chen1,2, Zhiyong Hou1, Biyan Lu3, Chuangyu Wen1, Suran Huang1.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most fatal gynecological malignancies in the world and confers a poor 5-year survival rate. The present study was designed to discover novel prognostic markers for patients with OC in order to estimate disease metastasis or recurrence. Based on the large cohorts of transcriptome data from multicenter sources, a comprehensive analysis was performed to explore potential prognostic markers. A total of 269 differentially expressed genes were identified, of which 32 were upregulated and 237 downregulated in OC tissues compared with the corresponding expression in normal tissues. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test and nomogram analysis were employed to demonstrate that low expression levels of claudin 10 (CLDN10) were associated with a less favorable disease prognosis. The most promising prognostic marker for OC was subsequently selected. Additionally, the prognostic nomogram was constructed in order to assess the 5-year survival rate using CLDN10 expression as a prognostic marker for OC. Furthermore, gene set enrichment analysis and analysis of the tumor-associated competing endogenous RNA network were performed to elucidate the potential biological processes associated with CLDN10 expression. The current results indicated that CLDN10 may influence OC progression via transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)- or WNT/β-catenin-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). The associations among CLDN10, microRNA-486-5p, TGF-β, WNT/β-catenin and EMT should be further investigated in future studies. Copyright: © Li et al.Entities:
Keywords: claudin 10; competing endogenous RNA; ovarian cancer; prognosis; signaling pathways
Year: 2020 PMID: 32565963 PMCID: PMC7285858 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.11557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1.Identification of DEGs and candidate genes. (A) Venn plot of upregulated DEGs via log2 fold-change. (B) Venn plot of downregulated DEGs via log2 fold-change. (C) Log-rank P-value of 15 selected DEGs (P<0.05). (D) CLDN10 expression differences between tumor and normal tissues by analyzing multicenter data sources. CLDN10 was upregulated in OC tissues. (E) Quantitative PCR analysis of CLDN10 expression in 82 ovarian tumor and 82 normal ovarian tissues. (F) CLDN10 was upregulated in FIGO I/II tumor tissues compared with that in FIGO III/IV tumor tissues. ****P<0.0001. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; CLDN10, claudin 10; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Association between CLDN10 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with ovarian cancer.
| CLDN10 expression | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical factor | High (n=133) | Low (n=133) | Total (n=266) | 95% CI | P-value |
| Mean age ± SD, years | 57.14±10.47 | 60.9±11.04 | 1.1513–6.3675 | 0.0049 | |
| Tumor pathological stage, n | |||||
| Stage I–II | 9 | 11 | 20 | 0.4495–3.5211 | 0.8167 |
| Stage III–IV | 123 | 121 | 244 | ||
| Grade, n | 2.8688–3.0024 | ||||
| G1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.8200 | |
| G2 | 15 | 17 | 32 | ||
| G3 | 113 | 111 | 224 | ||
| G4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| GB | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| GX | 3 | 1 | 4 | ||
| Primary site, n | 0.3413–0.5238 | ||||
| Bilateral | 95 | 85 | 180 | 0.6890 | |
| Left | 16 | 19 | 35 | ||
| Right | 18 | 19 | 37 | ||
| Tumor status | 0.7075–1.8518 | ||||
| Tumor-free | 34 | 25 | 59 | 0.6426 | |
| With tumor | 83 | 91 | 174 | ||
| Vascular invasion indicator | 0.3081–2.1570 | ||||
| Yes | 15 | 18 | 33 | 0.6596 | |
| No | 21 | 31 | 52 | ||
| Mean disease-free survival time ± SD, months | 20.74±20.23 | 17.139±12.62 | −7.4010–0.2000 | 0.0633 | |
| Mean overall survival time ± SD, months | 40.976±30.86 | 31.271±22.46 | −16.5740(−)-2.8350 | 0.0058 | |
| Longest dimension, cm | 1.353077 | 1.485833 | 0.0087–0.27426 | 0.0658 | |
CLDN10, claudin 10.
Figure 2.Prognostic value of CLDN10 in clinical applications. (A) Overall survival analysis of patients with low and high CLDN10 expression in The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Low expression levels of CLDN10 indicated poor survival. (B) Difference between true values and predicted values. (C) Nomogram for predicting survival probabilities. Each clinical characteristic is shown with its corresponding score. CLDN10 expression was used as a novel variable in the nomogram. nCLDN10 represents the normalized expression levels of CLDN10. The C-index of the nomogram is 0.776. CLDN10, claudin 10.
Figure 3.ceRNA network constructed with the Cytoscape software. Red node, CLDN10; yellow nodes, miRs; light blue nodes, circRNAs; blue nodes, long non-coding RNAs. CLDN10, claudin 10; miRs, microRNAs; circRNAs, circular RNAs.
Figure 4.Detection of biological pathways and internal mechanisms. (A) Enrichment of genes in the ‘KEGG_TGF_BETA_SIGNALING_PATHWAY’ via GSEA. (B) Enrichment of genes in ‘KEGG_BASAL_CELL_CARCINOMA’ via GSEA. (C) Enrichment of genes in ‘KEGG_MELANOMA’ via GSEA. (D) Enrichment of genes in the ‘KEGG_WNT_SIGNALING_PATHWAY’ via GSEA. (E) Enriched pathways identified via GSEA using the Molecular Signatures Database. KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis; TGF, transforming growth factor.