J Bradley Layton1, Leah J McGrath2, John M Sahrmann3, Yinjiao Ma4, Vikas R Dharnidharka5, Caroline O'Neil6, David J Weber7, Anne M Butler8. 1. RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. Electronic address: jblayton@rti.org. 2. NoviSci, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: lmcgrath@novisci.com. 3. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: jsahrmann@wustl.edu. 4. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: mayinjiao@wustl.edu. 5. Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Hypertension and Pheresis, Departments of Pediatrics and Nephrology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: vikasd@wustl.edu. 6. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: oneilc@wustl.edu. 7. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: dweber@unch.unc.edu. 8. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: anne.butler@wustl.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-dose influenza vaccine (HDV) is an alternative vaccination strategy in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), though the safety of HDV has not been evaluated in this population. The objective of this study was to estimate the relative occurrence of adverse vaccine reactions in patients with ESRD following vaccination with HDV compared with standard-dose influenza vaccine (SDV). METHODS: Using data from the United States Renal Data System, we identified patients with ESRD aged ≥ 65 years at influenza vaccination during yearly influenza seasons from 2010 through 2016. Patients were followed after vaccination to observe serious (anaphylaxis, angioedema, seizure, encephalopathy, Guillain-Barré syndrome [GBS], and short-term, all-cause mortality) and milder (urticaria/hives, rash, pain in limb, cellulitis, myalgia/myositis, fever, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, and syncope) adverse events. Propensity score-weighted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for HDV versus SDV were estimated with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of 520,876 vaccinations observed (mean age = 74.7 years at vaccination; 63% white race), 7.4% were HDV. For serious events, the weighted HRs were null for seizure, encephalopathy, and mortality and inestimable due to too few cases for anaphylaxis, angioedema, and GBS. For milder vaccine reactions, the weighted HRs demonstrated generally increased risks in the HDV group, including rash (HR = 1.86; 95% CI, 1.34-2.57), diarrhea (HR = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07-1.50), pain in limb (HR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12-1.34), and myalgia/myositis (HR = 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: The risks of serious adverse events were low and similar between treatment groups; however, HDV recipients had increased risks of several milder adverse events compared with SDV recipients, consistent with clinical trial findings in the general population of older adults. These results add important information to inform the risk-benefit tradeoff of the use of HDV versus SDV in patients with ESRD.
BACKGROUND: High-dose influenza vaccine (HDV) is an alternative vaccination strategy in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), though the safety of HDV has not been evaluated in this population. The objective of this study was to estimate the relative occurrence of adverse vaccine reactions in patients with ESRD following vaccination with HDV compared with standard-dose influenza vaccine (SDV). METHODS: Using data from the United States Renal Data System, we identified patients with ESRD aged ≥ 65 years at influenza vaccination during yearly influenza seasons from 2010 through 2016. Patients were followed after vaccination to observe serious (anaphylaxis, angioedema, seizure, encephalopathy, Guillain-Barré syndrome [GBS], and short-term, all-cause mortality) and milder (urticaria/hives, rash, pain in limb, cellulitis, myalgia/myositis, fever, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, and syncope) adverse events. Propensity score-weighted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for HDV versus SDV were estimated with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of 520,876 vaccinations observed (mean age = 74.7 years at vaccination; 63% white race), 7.4% were HDV. For serious events, the weighted HRs were null for seizure, encephalopathy, and mortality and inestimable due to too few cases for anaphylaxis, angioedema, and GBS. For milder vaccine reactions, the weighted HRs demonstrated generally increased risks in the HDV group, including rash (HR = 1.86; 95% CI, 1.34-2.57), diarrhea (HR = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07-1.50), pain in limb (HR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12-1.34), and myalgia/myositis (HR = 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: The risks of serious adverse events were low and similar between treatment groups; however, HDV recipients had increased risks of several milder adverse events compared with SDV recipients, consistent with clinical trial findings in the general population of older adults. These results add important information to inform the risk-benefit tradeoff of the use of HDV versus SDV in patients with ESRD.
Authors: Carlos A DiazGranados; Andrew J Dunning; Emilia Jordanov; Victoria Landolfi; Martine Denis; H Keipp Talbot Journal: Vaccine Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Leah J McGrath; Abhijit V Kshirsagar; Stephen R Cole; Lily Wang; David J Weber; Til Stürmer; M Alan Brookhart Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-04-09
Authors: Joshua J Gagne; Katsiaryna Bykov; Richard J Willke; Kristijan H Kahler; Prasun Subedi; Sebastian Schneeweiss Journal: Value Health Date: 2013-08-12 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Anne M Butler; J Bradley Layton; Vikas R Dharnidharka; John M Sahrmann; Marissa J Seamans; David J Weber; Leah J McGrath Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Dana C Miskulin; Daniel E Weiner; Hocine Tighiouart; Eduardo K Lacson; Klemens B Meyer; Taimur Dad; Harold J Manley Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Laura Labriola; Anneleen Hombrouck; Céline Maréchal; Steven Van Gucht; Bernard Brochier; Isabelle Thomas; Michel Jadoul; Patrick Goubau Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 5.992