Literature DB >> 32565068

Optimized stereotactic volumetric modulated arc therapy as an alternative to brachytherapy for vaginal cuff boost. A dosimetric study.

Savino Cilla1, Gabriella Macchia2, Giancarlo Mattiucci3, Anna Ianiro4, Carmela Romano4, Milly Buwenge5, Luigi Azario6, Vincenzo Valentini7, Francesco Deodato2, Alessio G Morganti5.   

Abstract

We evaluate the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique as an alternative to high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in the treatment of vaginal cuff in postoperative endometrial cancer. CT scans of 8 patients were used in this study. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the 0.5 cm tissue around the applicator (then subtracting the applicator). Total dose was 30Gy delivered in 5 fractions. In HDR-BT, dose was prescribed at a distance of 0.5 cm from the surface applicator. For VMAT irradiation, a planning target volume (PTV) was obtained from CTV by an expansion of 3 mm. Two VMAT plans were generated using a full arc rotation. The first plan was optimized with an anatomy-based optimization module (PO-VMAT) using a 1mm multileaf collimator beam margin to enhance dose heterogeneity and dose fallout outside the target. The second plan was generated with a full-inverse planning module (FI-VMAT). Conformity (CI100, CI50, CI25), gradient (GI) indexes, and integral doses were calculated. To account for various dose heterogeneity distributions we calculated the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) using the Niemerko model. A Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance followed by Dunn's-type multiple comparisons was performed. Dose distributions were more heterogeneous with HDR-BT: Dmean was 144.2% of prescription dose for CTV in HDR-BT and 118.5 and 108.6% for PTV in PO-VMAT and FI-VMAT, respectively. The mean values of EUD for CTV were 136.9%, 130.0 %, and 111.0% of prescription dose in HDR-BT, PO-VMAT, and FI-VMAT plans, respectively. GI indexes were 2.81, 3.41, and 4.14 for HDR-BT, PO-VMAT, and FI-VMAT, respectively. Near-maximal doses (D0.1cc) for rectum and bladder were significantly higher in HDR-BT plans compared to PO-VMAT and FI-VMAT plans (rectum: 131.2% vs112.8% vs 112.0%, respectively; bladder: 129.2% vs 108.7%, and 109.8%, respectively). PO-VMAT plans were able to mimic the HDR-BT dose distribution, showing a successful capability of highly conformal dose distribution, EUD values similar to HDR-BT, and steep dose-gradient outside PTV, then providing a reasonable alternative to brachytherapy.
Copyright © 2020 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brachytherapy; Endometrial; SBRT; VMAT

Year:  2020        PMID: 32565068     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  2 in total

1.  Proton Arc Therapy vs Interstitial HDR Brachytherapy in Gynecologic Cancer with Parametrial/pelvic Side Wall Extension.

Authors:  ByongYong Yi; Sina Mossahebi; Arezoo Modiri; Elizabeth M Nichols; Mariana Guerrero; Narottam Lamichhane; Pranshu Mohindra
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 2.  The value of brachytherapy in the age of advanced external beam radiotherapy: a review of the literature in terms of dosimetry.

Authors:  Tibor Major; Georgina Fröhlich; Péter Ágoston; Csaba Polgár; Zoltán Takácsi-Nagy
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.621

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.