Literature DB >> 32563679

Osteoclast formation at the bone marrow/bone surface interface: Importance of structural elements, matrix, and intercellular communication.

Kent Søe1, Jean-Marie Delaisse2, Xenia Goldberg Borggaard3.   

Abstract

Osteoclasts, the multinucleated cells responsible for bone resorption, have an enormous destructive power which demands to be kept under tight control. Accordingly, the identification of molecular signals directing osteoclastogenesis and switching on their resorptive activity have received much attention. Mandatory factors were identified, but a very essential aspect of the control mechanism of osteoclastic resorption, i.e. its spatial control, remains poorly understood. Under physiological conditions, multinucleated osteoclasts are only detected on the bone surface, while their mono-nucleated precursors are only in the bone marrow. How are pre-osteoclasts targeted to the bone surface? How is their progressive differentiation coordinated with their approach to the bone surface sites to be resorbed, which is where they finally fuse? Here we review the information on the bone marrow distribution of differentiating pre-osteoclasts relative to the position of the mandatory factors for their differentiation as well as relative to physical entities that may affect their access to the remodelling sites. This info allows recognizing an "osteoclastogenesis route" through the bone marrow and leading to the coincident fusion/resorption site - but also points to what still remains to be clarified regarding this route and regarding the restriction of fusion at the resorption site. Finally, we discuss the mechanism responsible for the start of resorption and its spatial extension. This review underscores that fully understanding the control of bone resorption requires to consider it in both space and time - which demands taking into account the context of bone tissue.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone marrow; Collagen network; M-CSF; Osteoclast; Osteoclastogenesis; RANKL

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32563679     DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol        ISSN: 1084-9521            Impact factor:   7.727


  8 in total

Review 1.  Bone remodeling: an operational process ensuring survival and bone mechanical competence.

Authors:  Simona Bolamperti; Isabella Villa; Alessandro Rubinacci
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 13.362

2.  Osteoclasts' Ability to Generate Trenches Rather Than Pits Depends on High Levels of Active Cathepsin K and Efficient Clearance of Resorption Products.

Authors:  Xenia G Borggaard; Dinisha C Pirapaharan; Jean-Marie Delaissé; Kent Søe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Influence of the TGF-β Superfamily on Osteoclasts/Osteoblasts Balance in Physiological and Pathological Bone Conditions.

Authors:  Jessica Jann; Suzanne Gascon; Sophie Roux; Nathalie Faucheux
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Fusion Potential of Human Osteoclasts In Vitro Reflects Age, Menopause, and In Vivo Bone Resorption Levels of Their Donors-A Possible Involvement of DC-STAMP.

Authors:  Anaïs M J Møller; Jean-Marie Delaissé; Jacob B Olesen; Luisa M Canto; Silvia R Rogatto; Jonna S Madsen; Kent Søe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Perspective of the GEMSTONE Consortium on Current and Future Approaches to Functional Validation for Skeletal Genetic Disease Using Cellular, Molecular and Animal-Modeling Techniques.

Authors:  Martina Rauner; Ines Foessl; Melissa M Formosa; Erika Kague; Vid Prijatelj; Nerea Alonso Lopez; Bodhisattwa Banerjee; Dylan Bergen; Björn Busse; Ângelo Calado; Eleni Douni; Yankel Gabet; Natalia García Giralt; Daniel Grinberg; Nika M Lovsin; Xavier Nogues Solan; Barbara Ostanek; Nathan J Pavlos; Fernando Rivadeneira; Ivan Soldatovic; Jeroen van de Peppel; Bram van der Eerden; Wim van Hul; Susanna Balcells; Janja Marc; Sjur Reppe; Kent Søe; David Karasik
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 6.  Osteoclast Fusion: Physiological Regulation of Multinucleation through Heterogeneity-Potential Implications for Drug Sensitivity.

Authors:  Kent Søe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Osteosarcoma and Metastasis Associated Bone Degradation-A Tale of Osteoclast and Malignant Cell Cooperativity.

Authors:  Kirstine Sandal Nørregaard; Henrik Jessen Jürgensen; Henrik Gårdsvoll; Lars Henning Engelholm; Niels Behrendt; Kent Søe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Stimulation of Osteoclast Formation by Oncostatin M and the Role of WNT16 as a Negative Feedback Regulator.

Authors:  Pedro P C de Souza; Petra Henning; Ulf H Lerner
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.