| Literature DB >> 32563240 |
Peiqin Li1, Boer Shan2, Keyu Jia1, Fan Hu1, Ying Xiao3, Jusheng Zheng4, Yu-Tang Gao5, Huaying Wang6, Ying Gao7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) were proposed to have potential effects against inflammation and cancer. However, results from epidemiology studies remain inconsistent. We aimed to explore the associations of plasma PUFAs with EC recurrence and all-cause mortality.Entities:
Keywords: EPA; Endometrial cancer; Omega-3 PUFAs; Recurrence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32563240 PMCID: PMC7305622 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07035-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Basic characteristics of patients with endometrial cancer according to tertiles of plasma total omega-3 PUFAa
| Variable | Tertile1 | Tertile2 | Tertile3 | Pg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total omega-3 PUFA (wt%) | < 4.03 | 4.04–4.99 | > 5.00 | |
| No. of patients | 65 | 66 | 64 | |
| Age at diagnosis | 56.0(49.0–64.0) | 57.0(50.0–61.0) | 54.0(51.0–58.0) | 0.28 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.2(21.6–27.0) | 24.0(21.8–27.3) | 23.6(21.3–26.7) | 0.36 |
| Age at menarche, years | 15.0(14.0–16.0) | 15.0(14.0–17.0) | 15.0(14.0–16.0) | 0.49 |
| Menopausal status | 0.80 | |||
| Premenopausal | 22(33.85) | 20(30.3) | 23(35.94) | |
| Postmenopausal | 43(66.15) | 46(69.70) | 41(64.06) | |
| Age at menopause, years | 51.0(49.0–53.0) | 50.0(49.0–53.0) | 50.0(48.0–52.0) | 0.056 |
| Gravidity | 0.94 | |||
| 0–2 | 28(43.08) | 28(43.94) | 28(43.75) | |
| ≥3 | 37(56.92) | 37(56.06) | 36(56.25) | |
| Full-term birth | 0.59 | |||
| 0–2 | 45(69.23) | 50(75.76) | 47(73.44) | |
| ≥3 | 20(30.77) | 16(24.24) | 17(26.56) | |
| Abortion (yes), % | 37(56.92) | 39(59.09) | 39(60.94) | 0.64 |
| Hormonal therapy (ever), % | 3(4.62) | 3(4.55) | 6(9.38) | 0.48 |
| Hypertension (ever), % | 15(23.08) | 16(24.24) | 11(17.19) | 0.42 |
| History of other cancer (ever), %b | 2(3.08) | 3(4.55) | 6(9.38) | 0.12 |
| Family history of cancer (ever), %c | 17(26.15) | 17(25.76) | 11(17.19) | 0.23 |
| Long-term medication history (ever), %d | 9(13.85) | 15(22.73) | 11(17.19) | 0.66 |
| FIGO stage | 0.85 | |||
| I-II | 53(81.54) | 55(83.33) | 53(82.81) | |
| III-IV | 12(18.46) | 11(16.67) | 11(17.19) | |
| Grade | 0.86 | |||
| Low-grade (1–2) | 54(83.08) | 58(89.23) | 53(84.13) | |
| High-grade (3) | 11(16.92) | 7(10.77) | 10(15.87) | |
| Myometrial invasion | 0.92 | |||
| < 50% | 49(75.38) | 46(71.88) | 48(76.19) | |
| ≥50% | 16(24.62) | 18(28.13) | 15(23.81) | |
| Histological type | 0.69 | |||
| Endometrioid adenocarcinoma | 62(95.38) | 61(93.85) | 60(93.75) | |
| Others | 3(4.62) | 4(6.15) | 4(6.25) | |
| Extrauterine Involvemente | 0.95 | |||
| Negative | 59(90.77) | 58(90.63) | 57(90.48) | |
| Positive | 6(9.23) | 6(9.38) | 6(9.52) | |
| Lymph node involvementf | 0.78 | |||
| Negative | 56(86.15) | 55(83.33) | 56(87.5) | |
| Positive | 6(9.23) | 5(7.58) | 4(6.25) | |
| Unknown | 3(4.62) | 6(9.09) | 4(6.25) | |
| Adjuvant treatment | 0.86 | |||
| None | 41(63.08) | 44(66.67) | 39(60.94) | |
| Chemotherapy or radiotherapy | 20(30.77) | 20(30.30) | 22(34.38) | |
| Unknown | 4(6.15) | 2(3.03) | 3(4.69) |
aTotal plasma omega-3 PUFA was defined as the sum of ALA, EPA, DPA and DHA. Data are presented as proportions for categorical data, medians and interquartile ranges for continuous data
bHistory of other cancer, including breast cancer, thyroid cancer, rectal cancer
Long-term medication history, including anti-cancer drugs, blood pressure drugs, diabetes
cFamily history of cancer: immediate relatives who have a history of any cancer were marked as yes, the cancer including Lung cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, liver, gallbladder, ovarian cancer, esophageal cancer
dLong-term medication history, including anti-cancer drugs, blood pressure drugs, diabetes
eExtrauterineInvolvement: any of the adnexa or vagina or parametrialwas involved
fLymph node involvement: any of the Pelvic lymph node involvement or Para-aortic lymph node involvement was involved
gP values were obtained using the Chi-Square test for categorical data and linear regression for continuous data
Fig. 1The association between level of EPA and EC recurrence. a Level of plasma EPA between non-recurrence population and recurrence population. Kruskal-Wallis was used to test the difference EPA level between these two groups, P < 0.05 was considered as significant. b Kaplan-Meier curves of EC recurrence according to tertile of plasma EPA. Blue line: low level of EPA (first tertile); Green line: median level of EPA (second tertile); Red line: high level of EPA (third tertile), P < 0.05 was considered as significant
Associations between plasma n-3 PUFAs and endometrial cancer recurrencea
| Variable | Tertile1 | Tertile2 | Tertile3 | P-trendb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C18:3n3 | ||||
| wt% | 0.62(0.54–0.67) | 0.86(0.79–0.93) | 1.23(1.07–1.33) | |
| Events/total(n/n) | 3/65 | 5/66 | 5/64 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.87(0.43–8.1) | 1.94(0.45–8.37) | 0.43 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.74(0.41–7.4) | 3.78(0.87–16.41) | 0.07 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 2.15(0.48–9.66) | 3.28(0.7–15.41) | 0.13 |
| C20:5n3 | ||||
| wt% | 0.31(0.26–0.36) | 0.53(0.46–0.6) | 0.84(0.73–1.02) | |
| Events/total(n/n) | 1/65 | 3/66 | 9/64 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 2.88(0.3–27.74) | 9.71(1.23–76.73) | 0.01 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 2.83(0.29–27.34) | 7.3(0.89–59.68) | 0.03 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.98(0.19–21.12) | 6.02(0.7–52.06) | 0.04 |
| C22:5n3 | ||||
| wt% | 0.39(0.35–0.42) | 0.5(0.46–0.54) | 0.63(0.6–0.7) | |
| Events/total(n/n) | 1/65 | 6/66 | 6/64 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 6.57(0.78–55.51) | 6.61(0.79–55.1) | 0.1 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 8.48(0.99–72.72) | 7.82(0.93–65.77) | 0.06 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 7.02(0.73–67.61) | 7.19(0.81–64.1) | 0.1 |
| C22:6n3 | ||||
| wt% | 2.04(1.74–2.21) | 2.62(2.47–2.82) | 3.39(3.11–4) | |
| Events/total(n/n) | 2/65 | 7/66 | 4/64 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 3.14(0.65–15.13) | 1.97(0.36–10.86) | 0.6 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 3.25(0.66–15.89) | 1.59(0.29–8.82) | 0.87 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 3.25(0.61–17.31) | 1.22(0.2–7.54) | 0.77 |
| HUFA | ||||
| wt% | 2.88(2.61–3.06) | 3.65(3.48–3.84) | 4.8(4.31–5.67) | |
| Events/total(n/n) | 2/65 | 4/66 | 7/64 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.77(0.32–9.67) | 3.56(0.73–17.29) | 0.09 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.69(0.3–9.42) | 2.55(0.52–12.59) | 0.23 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.57(0.27–9.14) | 2(0.38–10.54) | 0.42 |
| Total n-3 PUFA | ||||
| wt% | 3.68(3.42–3.93) | 4.53(4.35–4.72) | 5.79(5.22–6.65) | |
| Events/total(n/n) | 3/65 | 3/66 | 7/64 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.95(0.19–4.72) | 2.4(0.62–9.37) | 0.15 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.96(0.19–4.83) | 2.3(0.59–9.02) | 0.17 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.77(0.14–4.19) | 1.7(0.4–7.33) | 0.32 |
Abbreviation: PUFA Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids, HUFA Highly Unsaturated Fatty Acid
aHUFA was defined as EPA + DPA + DHA. Total omega-3 PUFA was defined as ALA+EPA + DPA + DHA. Cox regression was used to estimate the HRs and CIs. PUFAs were classified into three groups based on the tertiles in total subjects, the lowest tertile group was treated as reference
bP-trend values were conducted by assigning the median value to each tertile in the Cox regression models
Model 1: adjusting for age
Model 2: adjusting for age, BMI, and stage
Model 3: adjusting for age, BMI, stage, hormone therapy, and adjuvant therapy
Fig. 2Stratified analysis of the association of total omega-3 PUFAs and the risk of EC recurrence. All the HRs were adjusted for age, bmi, and stage in cox regression with Firth’s Penalized Likelihood, P-trend values were obtained by treating ordinal omega-3 PUFA as continuous in cox regression models in subgroups. Interaction test was conducted by entering the cross product of total omega-3 PUFA and the variables of interest. P < 0.05 was considered as significant
Association between ratios of omega-3 PUFAs and EC recurrencea
| Variable | Tertile1 | Tertile2 | Tertile3 | P-trendb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C20:5n3/C18:3n3 | 0.37(0.3–0.42) | 0.59(0.53–0.65) | 1.07(0.86–1.39) | |
| Events/total(n/n) | 4/65 | 4/66 | 5/64 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.04(0.26–4.16) | 1.21(0.32–4.58) | 0.805 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.82(0.2–3.36) | 0.65(0.16–2.67) | 0.541 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.49(0.1–2.44) | 0.5(0.11–2.24) | 0.505 |
| C22:5n3/C20:5n3 | 0.66(0.56–0.73) | 1(0.92–1.07) | 1.44(1.3–1.73) | |
| Events/total(n/n) | 6/65 | 3/66 | 2/64 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 0.46(0.14–1.53) | 0.13(0.02–1.03) | 0.027 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 0.96(0.26–3.6) | 0.16(0.02–1.3) | 0.074 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 0.90(0.23–3.44) | 0.14(0.02–1.17) | 0.056 |
aCox regression was used to estimate the HRs and CIs. PUFAs were classified into three groups based on the tertiles in total subjects, the lowest tertile group was treated as reference
bP-trend values were conducted by assigning the median value to each tertile in the Cox regression models
Model 1: adjusting for age
Model 2: adjusting for age, BMI, and stage
Model 3: adjusting for age, BMI, stage, hormone therapy, and adjuvant therapy
Fig. 3Omega-3 PUFA metabolism is related with EC recurrence. a Pathway of omega-3 PUFAs metabolism. b Elongase 5/2 activity was calculated as the ratio of DPA/EPA. Level of DPA/EPA among total population, non-recurrence and recurrence population. Kruskal-Wallis was used to test the difference DPA/EPA level among these three groups, P < 0.05 was considered as significant