Literature DB >> 32563236

MicroRNA-21 in plasma exosome, but not from whole plasma, as a biomarker for the severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) in post-renal transplantation.

Sunaree Saejong1, Natavudh Townamchai2, Poorichaya Somparn3, Pattarin Tangtanatakul4, Thunnicha Ondee5, Nattiya Hirankarn6, Asada Leelahavanichkul5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive diagnosis of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA), a major cause of chronic allograft dysfunction in post-kidney transplantation (post-KT), is needed.
OBJECTIVE: Several candidates of microRNAs (miRs) in plasma exosome or whole plasma were evaluated for IF/TA biomarker.
METHODS: Kidney samples from biopsy and plasma were tested for miRs expression.
RESULTS: Expression of miR-21, miR-142-3p and miR-221 in renal histology with high fibrosis score (Banff classification) was higher than the samples with lesser score (n = 17/group). However, expression of these miRs from plasma exosome or from whole plasma of post-KT patients with different severity of IF/TA as determined by percentage of IF/TA including; grade I (5-25%) (n = 15), grade II (26-50%) (n = 15), grade III (≥ 50%) (n = 6) versus stable graft function (no IF/TA) (n = 15) was not different. However, high expression of miR-21 in exosome, but not from whole plasma, was demonstrated in IF/TA grade II and III compared with IF/TA grade I. In contrast, serum creatinine (Scr) and proteinuria, the current standard biomarkers, could not differentiate IF/TA grade I out of grade II/III. There was no correlation between exosome miR-21 versus the current standard renal injury biomarkers, including Scr, blood urea nitrogen and proteinuria, in IF/TA grade II or grade III.
CONCLUSIONS: High miR-21 in plasma exosome, but not in whole plasma, indicated high grade IF/TA in post-KT patients. This non-invasive monitoring biomarker allows the more frequent evaluation on IF/TA than renal biopsy (a standard but more invasive procedure) resulting in the earlier management. More studies on patients are warrant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 32563236     DOI: 10.12932/AP-101019-0656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 0125-877X            Impact factor:   2.310


  7 in total

Review 1.  Extracellular Vesicles in Liquid Biopsies: Potential for Disease Diagnosis.

Authors:  Jialing Liu; Ye Chen; Fang Pei; Chongmai Zeng; Yang Yao; Wen Liao; Zhihe Zhao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Roles of Exosomes in Cardiac Fibroblast Activation and Fibrosis.

Authors:  Julia Hohn; Wenbin Tan; Amanda Carver; Hayden Barrett; Wayne Carver
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 3.  Small Extracellular Vesicles in Transplant Rejection.

Authors:  Justyna E Gołębiewska; Anna Wardowska; Monika Pietrowska; Anna Wojakowska; Alicja Dębska-Ślizień
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 4.  Epigenetic Regulation in Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Xiaohong Xiang; Jiefu Zhu; Guie Dong; Zheng Dong
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 5.  What do we actually know about exosomal microRNAs in kidney diseases?

Authors:  Qianyu Li; Zhiping Zhang; Min Yin; Cancan Cui; Yucheng Zhang; Yali Wang; Feng Liu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 6.  Extracellular Vesicles in Organ Fibrosis: Mechanisms, Therapies, and Diagnostics.

Authors:  David R Brigstock
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  METTL3/N6-methyladenosine/ miR-21-5p promotes obstructive renal fibrosis by regulating inflammation through SPRY1/ERK/NF-κB pathway activation.

Authors:  Erpeng Liu; Lei Lv; Yonghao Zhan; Yuan Ma; Jinjin Feng; Yulin He; Yibo Wen; Yanping Zhang; Qingsong Pu; Fengping Ji; Xinghuan Yang; Jian Guo Wen
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.310

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.