Literature DB >> 32563191

Type of menopause, age of menopause and variations in the risk of incident cardiovascular disease: pooled analysis of individual data from 10 international studies.

Dongshan Zhu1, Hsin-Fang Chung1, Annette J Dobson1, Nirmala Pandeya1,2, Eric J Brunner3, Diana Kuh4, Darren C Greenwood5, Rebecca Hardy6, Janet E Cade5, Graham G Giles7,8,9, Fiona Bruinsma7, Panayotes Demakakos3, Mette Kildevæld Simonsen10, Sven Sandin11,12, Elisabete Weiderpass13, Gita D Mishra1.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: How does the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) vary with type and age of menopause? SUMMARY ANSWER: Earlier surgical menopause (e.g. <45 years) poses additional increased risk of incident CVD events, compared to women with natural menopause at the same age, and HRT use reduced the risk of CVD in women with early surgical menopause. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Earlier age at menopause has been linked to an increased risk of CVD mortality and all-cause mortality, but the extent that this risk of CVD varies by type of menopause and the role of postmenopausal HRT use in reducing this risk is unclear. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Pooled individual-level data of 203 767 postmenopausal women from 10 observational studies that contribute to the International collaboration for a Life course Approach to reproductive health and Chronic disease Events (InterLACE) consortium were included in the analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Postmenopausal women who had reported menopause (type and age of menopause) and information on non-fatal CVD events were included. Type of menopause (natural menopause and surgical menopause) and age at menopause (categorised as <35, 35-39, 40-44, 45-49, 50-54 and ≥55 years) were exposures of interest. Natural menopause was defined as absence of menstruation over a period of 12 months (no hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy) and surgical menopause as removal of both ovaries. The study outcome was the first non-fatal CVD (defined as either incident coronary heart disease (CHD) or stroke) event ascertained from hospital medical records or self-reported. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI for non-fatal CVD events associated with natural menopause and surgical menopause. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Compared with natural menopause, surgical menopause was associated with over 20% higher risk of CVD (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.16-1.28). After the stratified analysis by age at menopause, a graded relationship for incident CVD was observed with lower age at menopause in both types of natural and surgical menopause. There was also a significant interaction between type of menopause and age at menopause (P < 0.001). Compared with natural menopause at 50-54 years, women with surgical menopause before 35 (2.55, 2.22-2.94) and 35-39 years (1.91, 1.71-2.14) had higher risk of CVD than those with natural menopause (1.59, 1.23-2.05 and 1.51, 1.33-1.72, respectively). Women who experienced surgical menopause at earlier age (<50 years) and took HRT had lower risk of incident CHD than those who were not users of HRT. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Self-reported data on type and age of menopause, no information on indication for the surgery (e.g. endometriosis and fibroids) and the exclusion of fatal CVD events may bias our results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: In clinical practice, women who experienced natural menopause or had surgical menopause at an earlier age need close monitoring and engagement for preventive health measures and early diagnosis of CVD. Our findings also suggested that timing of menopause should be considered as an important factor in risk assessment of CVD for women. The findings on CVD lend some support to the position that elective bilateral oophorectomy (surgical menopause) at hysterectomy for benign diseases should be discouraged based on an increased risk of CVD. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): InterLACE project is funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council project grant (APP1027196). GDM is supported by Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Principal Research Fellowship (APP1121844). There are no competing interests.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HRT; age at menopause; cardiovascular disease; hazard ratio; natural menopause; pooled analysis; surgical menopause

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32563191      PMCID: PMC8453420          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  42 in total

Review 1.  Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in women with endometriosis: a systematic review of risk factors and prospects for early surveillance.

Authors:  Justin Tan; Omur Taskin; Mahmoud Iews; Arthur J Lee; Arohumam Kan; Timothy Rowe; Mohamed A Bedaiwy
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy and long-term health outcomes in the nurses' health study.

Authors:  William H Parker; Michael S Broder; Eunice Chang; Diane Feskanich; Cindy Farquhar; Zhimae Liu; Donna Shoupe; Jonathan S Berek; Susan Hankinson; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Endometriosis and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Fan Mu; Janet Rich-Edwards; Eric B Rimm; Donna Spiegelman; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2016-03-29

4.  Reproducibility and validity of self-reported menopausal status in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; W C Willett; W B Stason; B Rosner; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Estradiol and testosterone levels are lower after oophorectomy than after natural menopause.

Authors:  Catharina M Korse; Johannes M G Bonfrer; Marc van Beurden; René H M Verheijen; Matti A Rookus
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2009-02-05

6.  Body mass index and age at natural menopause: an international pooled analysis of 11 prospective studies.

Authors:  Dongshan Zhu; Hsin-Fang Chung; Nirmala Pandeya; Annette J Dobson; Diana Kuh; Sybil L Crawford; Ellen B Gold; Nancy E Avis; Graham G Giles; Fiona Bruinsma; Hans-Olov Adami; Elisabete Weiderpass; Darren C Greenwood; Janet E Cade; Ellen S Mitchell; Nancy F Woods; Eric J Brunner; Mette Kildevæld Simonsen; Gita D Mishra
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 7.  Age at Menarche, Level of Education, Parity and the Risk of Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Population-Based Observational Studies.

Authors:  Louise F Wilson; Gita D Mishra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The InterLACE study: Design, data harmonization and characteristics across 20 studies on women's health.

Authors:  Gita D Mishra; Hsin-Fang Chung; Nirmala Pandeya; Annette J Dobson; Lee Jones; Nancy E Avis; Sybil L Crawford; Ellen B Gold; Daniel Brown; Lynette L Sievert; Eric Brunner; Janet E Cade; Victoria J Burley; Darren C Greenwood; Graham G Giles; Fiona Bruinsma; Alissa Goodman; Kunihiko Hayashi; Jung Su Lee; Hideki Mizunuma; Diana Kuh; Rachel Cooper; Rebecca Hardy; Carla Makhlouf Obermeyer; Kathryn A Lee; Mette Kildevæld Simonsen; Toyoko Yoshizawa; Nancy F Woods; Ellen S Mitchell; Mark Hamer; Panayotes Demakakos; Sven Sandin; Hans-Olov Adami; Elisabete Weiderpass; Debra Anderson
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Socioeconomic position, lifestyle factors and age at natural menopause: a systematic review and meta-analyses of studies across six continents.

Authors:  Danielle A J M Schoenaker; Caroline A Jackson; Jemma V Rowlands; Gita D Mishra
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Association of menopausal characteristics and risk of coronary heart disease: a pan-European case-cohort analysis.

Authors:  Veerle Dam; Yvonne T van der Schouw; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Rolf H H Groenwold; Sanne A E Peters; Stephen Burgess; Angela M Wood; Maria-Dolores Chirlaque; Karel G M Moons; Clare Oliver-Williams; Ewoud Schuit; Kaja Tikk; Elisabete Weiderpass; Marianne Holm; Anne Tjønneland; Tilman Kühn; Renée T Fortner; Antonia Trichopoulou; Anna Karakatsani; Carlo La Vecchia; Pietro Ferrari; Marc Gunter; Giovanna Masala; Sabina Sieri; Rosario Tumino; Salvatore Panico; Jolanda M A Boer; W M Monique Verschuren; Elena Salamanca-Fernández; Larraitz Arriola; Conchi Moreno-Iribas; Gunnar Engström; Olle Melander; Maria Nordendahl; Patrik Wennberg; Timothy J Key; Sandra Colorado-Yohar; Giuseppe Matullo; Kim Overvad; Francoise Clavel-Chapelon; Heiner Boeing; J Ramon Quiros; Emanuele di Angelantonio; Claudia Langenberg; Michael J Sweeting; Elio Riboli; Nicholas J Wareham; John Danesh; Adam Butterworth
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  10 in total

1.  Lipid Profile in Patients With Primary Ovarian Insufficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ling Huang; Hanfeng Wang; Minglu Shi; Weizheng Kong; Mei Jiang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.055

2.  Coronary artery calcium and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in women with early menopause: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Jian H Chu; Erin D Michos; Pamela Ouyang; Dhananjay Vaidya; Roger S Blumenthal; Matthew J Budoff; Michael J Blaha; Seamus P Whelton
Journal:  Am J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2022-06-13

3.  Importance of Sex Differences in Research on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.

Authors:  Miho Iida
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.394

4.  The Relationship Between Menopause and Metabolic Syndrome: Experimental and Bioinformatics Analysis.

Authors:  Abir Jaballah; Ismael Soltani; Wael Bahia; Azza Dandana; Yosra Hasni; Abdelhedi Miled; Salima Ferchichi
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 1.890

5.  Clinical Practice Guidelines on Menopause: *An Executive Summary and Recommendations: Indian Menopause Society 2019-2020.

Authors:  Meeta Meeta; Leela Digumarti; Neelam Agarwal; Nirmala Vaze; Rashmi Shah; Sonia Malik
Journal:  J Midlife Health       Date:  2020-08-10

Review 6.  Cardiovascular risk in menopausal women and our evolving understanding of menopausal hormone therapy: risks, benefits, and current guidelines for use.

Authors:  Sindhu Prabakaran; Arielle Schwartz; Gina Lundberg
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.565

7.  Association of reproductive factors with dementia: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analyses of observational studies.

Authors:  Chunying Fu; Wenting Hao; Nipun Shrestha; Salim S Virani; Shiva Raj Mishra; Dongshan Zhu
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-12-14

8.  Sex differences in the association between cardiovascular diseases and dementia subtypes: a prospective analysis of 464,616 UK Biobank participants.

Authors:  Caiyun Dong; Chunmiao Zhou; Chunying Fu; Wenting Hao; Akihiko Ozaki; Nipun Shrestha; Salim S Virani; Shiva Raj Mishra; Dongshan Zhu
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 8.811

Review 9.  Roles of Hormone Replacement Therapy and Menopause on Osteoarthritis and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Yixue Mei; Jennifer S Williams; Erin K Webb; Alison K Shea; Maureen J MacDonald; Baraa K Al-Khazraji
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-03-28

10.  Menopause, hysterectomy, menopausal hormone therapy and cause-specific mortality: cohort study of UK Biobank participants.

Authors:  Zhiwei Xu; Hsin-Fang Chung; Annette J Dobson; Louise F Wilson; Martha Hickey; Gita D Mishra
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 6.353

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.