Minghui Han1, Pei Qin1, Quanman Li2,3,4, Ranran Qie1,2, Leilei Liu2, Yang Zhao2, Dechen Liu1,2, Dongdong Zhang1,2, Chunmei Guo2, Qionggui Zhou1, Gang Tian2, Shengbing Huang2, Xiaoyan Wu1, Yang Li1, Xingjin Yang2, Yang Zhao2, Yifei Feng2, Yu Liu3, Honghui Li3, Xizhuo Sun3, Qing Chen4, Tieqiang Wang5, Xiaoliang Chen5, Dongsheng Hu1,2,3,4,5, Ming Zhang1. 1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, PR China. 3. Community Health Management Center, The Affiliated Luohu Hospital of Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China. 4. Department of Mental Health, Bao'an Chronic Diseases Prevent and Cure Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China. 5. Key Lab of Epidemiology, Department of Chronic Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen Guangming District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The evidence of the association between Chinese visceral adiposity index (CVAI) and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is limited. We explored the association of CVAI with T2DM and directly compared with the predictive power of CVAI with other visceral obesity indices (visceral adiposity index, waist to height ratio, waist circumference and body mass index) based on a large prospective study. METHODS: We conducted a population-based study of 12 237 Chinese participants. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between CVAI and T2DM. RESULTS: During follow-up (median: 6.01 years), the incidence of T2DM was 3.29, 7.34, 12.37 and 23.72 per 1000 person-years for quartiles 1, 2, 3 and 4 of CVAI, respectively. The risk of T2DM was increased with quartiles 2, 3 and 4 vs quartile 1 of CVAI (HR 2.12 [95% CI 1.50-3.00], 2.94 [2.10-4.13] and 5.01 [3.57-7.04], Ptrend < 0.001). Per-SD increase in CVAI was associated with a 72% increased risk of T2DM (HR 1.72 [95% CI 1.56-1.88]). Sensitivity analyses did not alter the association. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly higher for CVAI than other visceral obesity indices (all P <.001). Similar results were observed in stratified analyses by sex. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show a positive association between CVAI and risk of T2DM. CVAI has the best performance in predicting incident T2DM, so the index might be a reliable and applicable indicator identifying people at high risk of T2DM.
BACKGROUND: The evidence of the association between Chinese visceral adiposity index (CVAI) and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is limited. We explored the association of CVAI with T2DM and directly compared with the predictive power of CVAI with other visceral obesity indices (visceral adiposity index, waist to height ratio, waist circumference and body mass index) based on a large prospective study. METHODS: We conducted a population-based study of 12 237 Chinese participants. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between CVAI and T2DM. RESULTS: During follow-up (median: 6.01 years), the incidence of T2DM was 3.29, 7.34, 12.37 and 23.72 per 1000 person-years for quartiles 1, 2, 3 and 4 of CVAI, respectively. The risk of T2DM was increased with quartiles 2, 3 and 4 vs quartile 1 of CVAI (HR 2.12 [95% CI 1.50-3.00], 2.94 [2.10-4.13] and 5.01 [3.57-7.04], Ptrend < 0.001). Per-SD increase in CVAI was associated with a 72% increased risk of T2DM (HR 1.72 [95% CI 1.56-1.88]). Sensitivity analyses did not alter the association. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly higher for CVAI than other visceral obesity indices (all P <.001). Similar results were observed in stratified analyses by sex. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show a positive association between CVAI and risk of T2DM. CVAI has the best performance in predicting incident T2DM, so the index might be a reliable and applicable indicator identifying people at high risk of T2DM.