Literature DB >> 32562264

Developing and evaluating risk prediction models with panel current status data.

Stephanie Chan1, Xuan Wang2, Ina Jazić1, Sarah Peskoe1, Yingye Zheng3, Tianxi Cai1.   

Abstract

Panel current status data arise frequently in biomedical studies when the occurrence of a particular clinical condition is only examined at several prescheduled visit times. Existing methods for analyzing current status data have largely focused on regression modeling based on commonly used survival models such as the proportional hazards model and the accelerated failure time model. However, these procedures have the limitations of being difficult to implement and performing sub-optimally in relatively small sample sizes. The performance of these procedures is also unclear under model misspecification. In addition, no methods currently exist to evaluate the prediction performance of estimated risk models with panel current status data. In this paper, we propose a simple estimator under a general class of nonparametric transformation (NPT) models by fitting a logistic regression working model and demonstrate that our proposed estimator is consistent for the NPT model parameter up to a scale multiplier. Furthermore, we propose nonparametric estimators for evaluating the prediction performance of the risk score derived from model fitting, which is valid regardless of the adequacy of the fitted model. Extensive simulation results suggest that our proposed estimators perform well in finite samples and the regression parameter estimators outperform existing estimators under various scenarios. We illustrate the proposed procedures using data from the Framingham Offspring Study.
© 2020 The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  current status data; model misspecification; risk prediction; robustness; single-index model

Year:  2020        PMID: 32562264      PMCID: PMC8168594          DOI: 10.1111/biom.13317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  15 in total

1.  Using conditional logistic regression to fit proportional odds models to interval censored data.

Authors:  D Rabinowitz; R A Betensky; A A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  On the covariate-adjusted estimation for an overall treatment difference with data from a randomized comparative clinical trial.

Authors:  Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; Lihui Zhao; Lee-Jen Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Regression analysis for current status data using the EM algorithm.

Authors:  Christopher S McMahan; Lianming Wang; Joshua M Tebbs
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A semiparametric probit model for case 2 interval-censored failure time data.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Lin; Lianming Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Toward a curse of dimensionality appropriate (CODA) asymptotic theory for semi-parametric models.

Authors:  J M Robins; Y Ritov
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997 Jan 15-Feb 15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Hypertension and antihypertensive therapy as risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  T W Gress; F J Nieto; E Shahar; M R Wofford; F L Brancati
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-03-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  A D Pradhan; J E Manson; N Rifai; J E Buring; P M Ridker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Augmented estimation for t-year survival with censored regression models.

Authors:  Yu Zheng; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  An investigation of coronary heart disease in families. The Framingham offspring study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; M Feinleib; P M McNamara; R J Garrison; W P Castelli
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Prediction models for risk of developing type 2 diabetes: systematic literature search and independent external validation study.

Authors:  Ali Abbasi; Linda M Peelen; Eva Corpeleijn; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Ronald P Stolk; Annemieke M W Spijkerman; Daphne L van der A; Karel G M Moons; Gerjan Navis; Stephan J L Bakker; Joline W J Beulens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.