Literature DB >> 32561920

Effectiveness and Feasibility of Taxing Salt and Foods High in Sodium: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Rebecca Dodd1, Joseph Alvin Santos1, Monique Tan2, Norm R C Campbell3, Cliona Ni Mhurchu1, Laura Cobb4, Michael F Jacobson5, Feng J He2,6, Kathy Trieu1, Sutayut Osornprasop7, Jacqui Webster1.   

Abstract

Diets high in salt are a leading risk for death and disability globally. Taxing unhealthy food is an effective means of influencing what people eat and improving population health. Although there is a growing body of evidence on taxing products high in sugar, and unhealthy foods more broadly, there is limited knowledge or experience of using fiscal measures to reduce salt consumption. We searched peer-reviewed databases [MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews] and gray literature for studies published between January 2000 and October 2019. Studies were included if they provided information on the impact on salt consumption of: taxes on salt; taxes on foods high in salt, and taxes on unhealthy foods defined to include foods high in salt. Studies were excluded if their definition of unhealthy foods did not specify high salt or sodium. We found 18 relevant studies, including 15 studies reporting the effects of salt taxes through modeling (8), real-world evaluation (4), experimental design (2), or review of cost-effectiveness (1); 6 studies providing information relevant to country implementation of salt taxes; and 2 studies reporting stakeholder perceptions toward salt taxation. Although there is some evidence on the potential effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of salt taxation, especially from modeling studies, uptake of salt taxation is limited in practice. Some modeling studies suggested that food taxes can have unintended outcomes such as reduced consumption of healthy foods, or increased consumption of unhealthy, untaxed substitutes. In contrast, modeling studies that combined taxes for unhealthy foods with subsidies found that the benefits were increased. Modeling suggests that taxing all foods based on their salt content is likely to have more impact than taxing specific products high in salt given that salt is pervasive in the food chain. However, the limited experience we found suggests that policy-makers favor taxing specific products.
Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  best buys; hypertension; salt; salt intake; salt reduction; salt tax; sodium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32561920      PMCID: PMC7666895          DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmaa067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   8.701


  35 in total

Review 1.  Compared with usual sodium intake, low- and excessive-sodium diets are associated with increased mortality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Niels Graudal; Gesche Jürgens; Bo Baslund; Michael H Alderman
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.689

2.  Modelling income group differences in the health and economic impacts of targeted food taxes and subsidies.

Authors:  Kelechi E Nnoaham; Gary Sacks; Mike Rayner; Oliver Mytton; Alastair Gray
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 3.  Healthy food subsidies and unhealthy food taxation: A systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Mark L Niebylski; Kimbree A Redburn; Tara Duhaney; Norm R Campbell
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 4.008

4.  The impact of the tax on sweetened beverages: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maite Redondo; Ildefonso Hernández-Aguado; Blanca Lumbreras
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Do high vs. low purchasers respond differently to a nonessential energy-dense food tax? Two-year evaluation of Mexico's 8% nonessential food tax.

Authors:  Lindsey Smith Taillie; Juan A Rivera; Barry M Popkin; Carolina Batis
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Designing a food tax to impact food-related non-communicable diseases: the case of Chile.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Caro; Lindsey Smith-Taillie; Shu Wen Ng; Barry Popkin
Journal:  Food Policy       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Consumer knowledge and attitudes to salt intake and labelled salt information.

Authors:  Carley A Grimes; Lynn J Riddell; Caryl A Nowson
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Could targeted food taxes improve health?

Authors:  Oliver Mytton; Alastair Gray; Mike Rayner; Harry Rutter
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Taxes and Subsidies for Improving Diet and Population Health in Australia: A Cost-Effectiveness Modelling Study.

Authors:  Linda J Cobiac; King Tam; Lennert Veerman; Tony Blakely
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sodium Intake and Related Diseases 2.0.

Authors:  Alessandra Durazzo; Ginevra Lombardi-Boccia; Antonello Santini; Massimo Lucarini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Strengthening implementation of diet-related non-communicable disease prevention strategies in Fiji: a qualitative policy landscape analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Mounsey; Gade Waqa; Briar McKenzie; Erica Reeve; Jacqui Webster; Colin Bell; Anne Marie Thow
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 10.401

Review 3.  Behavioural Nudges, Physico-Chemical Solutions, and Sensory Strategies to Reduce People's Salt Consumption.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-10-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.