Richard W Corbett1, Sarah Blakey1, Dorothea Nitsch2,3,4, Marina Loucaidou1, Adam McLean1, Neill Duncan1, Damien R Ashby5. 1. Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. 3. United Kingdom Renal Association Renal Registry, Bristol, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Nephrology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. 5. Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom damien.ashby@nhs.net.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, many countries have instituted population-wide measures for social distancing. The requirement of patients on dialysis for regular treatment in settings typically not conducive to social distancing may increase their vulnerability to COVID-19. METHODS: Over a 6-week period, we recorded new COVID-19 infections and outcomes for all adult patients receiving dialysis in a large dialysis center. Rapidly introduced control measures included a two-stage routine screening process at dialysis entry (temperature and symptom check, with possible cases segregated within the unit and tested for SARS-CoV-2), isolated dialysis in a separate unit for patients with infection, and universal precautions that included masks for dialysis nursing staff. RESULTS: Of 1530 patients (median age 66 years; 58.2% men) receiving dialysis, 300 (19.6%) developed COVID-19 infection, creating a large demand for isolated outpatient dialysis and inpatient beds. An analysis that included 1219 patients attending satellite dialysis clinics found that older age was a risk factor for infection. COVID-19 infection was substantially more likely to occur among patients on in-center dialysis compared with those dialyzing at home. We observed clustering in specific units and on specific shifts, with possible implications for aspects of service design, and high rates of nursing staff illness. A predictive epidemic model estimated a reproduction number of 2.2; cumulative cases deviated favorably from the model from the fourth week, suggesting that the implemented measures controlled transmission. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 epidemic affected a large proportion of patients at this dialysis center, creating service pressures exacerbated by nursing staff illness. Details of the control strategy and characteristics of this epidemic may be useful for dialysis providers and other institutions providing patient care.
BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, many countries have instituted population-wide measures for social distancing. The requirement of patients on dialysis for regular treatment in settings typically not conducive to social distancing may increase their vulnerability to COVID-19. METHODS: Over a 6-week period, we recorded new COVID-19infections and outcomes for all adult patients receiving dialysis in a large dialysis center. Rapidly introduced control measures included a two-stage routine screening process at dialysis entry (temperature and symptom check, with possible cases segregated within the unit and tested for SARS-CoV-2), isolated dialysis in a separate unit for patients with infection, and universal precautions that included masks for dialysis nursing staff. RESULTS: Of 1530 patients (median age 66 years; 58.2% men) receiving dialysis, 300 (19.6%) developed COVID-19infection, creating a large demand for isolated outpatient dialysis and inpatient beds. An analysis that included 1219 patients attending satellite dialysis clinics found that older age was a risk factor for infection. COVID-19infection was substantially more likely to occur among patients on in-center dialysis compared with those dialyzing at home. We observed clustering in specific units and on specific shifts, with possible implications for aspects of service design, and high rates of nursing staff illness. A predictive epidemic model estimated a reproduction number of 2.2; cumulative cases deviated favorably from the model from the fourth week, suggesting that the implemented measures controlled transmission. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 epidemic affected a large proportion of patients at this dialysis center, creating service pressures exacerbated by nursing staff illness. Details of the control strategy and characteristics of this epidemic may be useful for dialysis providers and other institutions providing patient care.
Authors: Safiya Richardson; Jamie S Hirsch; Mangala Narasimhan; James M Crawford; Thomas McGinn; Karina W Davidson; Douglas P Barnaby; Lance B Becker; John D Chelico; Stuart L Cohen; Jennifer Cookingham; Kevin Coppa; Michael A Diefenbach; Andrew J Dominello; Joan Duer-Hefele; Louise Falzon; Jordan Gitlin; Negin Hajizadeh; Tiffany G Harvin; David A Hirschwerk; Eun Ji Kim; Zachary M Kozel; Lyndonna M Marrast; Jazmin N Mogavero; Gabrielle A Osorio; Michael Qiu; Theodoros P Zanos Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Camilla Rothe; Mirjam Schunk; Peter Sothmann; Gisela Bretzel; Guenter Froeschl; Claudia Wallrauch; Thorbjörn Zimmer; Verena Thiel; Christian Janke; Wolfgang Guggemos; Michael Seilmaier; Christian Drosten; Patrick Vollmar; Katrin Zwirglmaier; Sabine Zange; Roman Wölfel; Michael Hoelscher Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Temet M McMichael; Dustin W Currie; Shauna Clark; Sargis Pogosjans; Meagan Kay; Noah G Schwartz; James Lewis; Atar Baer; Vance Kawakami; Margaret D Lukoff; Jessica Ferro; Claire Brostrom-Smith; Thomas D Rea; Michael R Sayre; Francis X Riedo; Denny Russell; Brian Hiatt; Patricia Montgomery; Agam K Rao; Eric J Chow; Farrell Tobolowsky; Michael J Hughes; Ana C Bardossy; Lisa P Oakley; Jesica R Jacobs; Nimalie D Stone; Sujan C Reddy; John A Jernigan; Margaret A Honein; Thomas A Clark; Jeffrey S Duchin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Carlo Basile; Christian Combe; Francesco Pizzarelli; Adrian Covic; Andrew Davenport; Mehmet Kanbay; Dimitrios Kirmizis; Daniel Schneditz; Frank van der Sande; Sandip Mitra Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Minesh Khatri; David M Charytan; Sam Parnia; Christopher M Petrilli; Jeffrey Michael; David Liu; Vasishta Tatapudi; Simon Jones; Judith Benstein; Leora I Horwitz Journal: Kidney360 Date: 2021-05-06
Authors: Sumanth Gandra; Tingting Li; Kimberly A Reske; Na Le Dang; Christopher W Farnsworth; Karl G Hock; Candace Miller; Margaret A Olsen; Jennie H Kwon; David K Warren; Victoria J Fraser Journal: Kidney360 Date: 2021-04-21
Authors: Michael S Anger; Claudy Mullon; Linda H Ficociello; David Thompson; Michael A Kraus; Pete Newcomb; Robert J Kossmann Journal: Kidney360 Date: 2020-12-29
Authors: Candice Clarke; Maria Prendecki; Amrita Dhutia; Mahrukh A Ali; Hira Sajjad; Oshini Shivakumar; Liz Lightstone; Peter Kelleher; Matthew C Pickering; David Thomas; Rawya Charif; Megan Griffith; Stephen P McAdoo; Michelle Willicombe Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 10.121