Tanis J Ferman1, Naoya Aoki2, Bradley F Boeve2, Jeremiah A Aakre2, Kejal Kantarci2, Jonathan Graff-Radford2, Joseph E Parisi2, Jay A Van Gerpen2, Neill R Graff-Radford2, Ryan J Uitti2, Otto Pedraza2, Melissa E Murray2, Zbigniew K Wszolek2, R Ross Reichard2, Julie A Fields2, Owen A Ross2, David S Knopman2, Ronald C Petersen2, Dennis W Dickson2. 1. From the Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology (T.J.F., O.P.), Neurology (J.A.V.G., N.R.G.-R., R.J.U., Z.K.W.), and Neuroscience (M.E.M., O.A.R., D.W.D.) Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Department of Psychiatry (N.A.), Yokohama University Medical Center, Japan; and Departments of Neurology (B.F.B., J.G.-R., D.S.K., R.C.P.), Health Sciences Research (J.A.A.), Radiology (K.K.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (J.E.P., R.R.R.), and Psychiatry and Psychology (J.A.F.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. ferman.tanis@mayo.edu. 2. From the Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology (T.J.F., O.P.), Neurology (J.A.V.G., N.R.G.-R., R.J.U., Z.K.W.), and Neuroscience (M.E.M., O.A.R., D.W.D.) Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Department of Psychiatry (N.A.), Yokohama University Medical Center, Japan; and Departments of Neurology (B.F.B., J.G.-R., D.S.K., R.C.P.), Health Sciences Research (J.A.A.), Radiology (K.K.), Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (J.E.P., R.R.R.), and Psychiatry and Psychology (J.A.F.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Lewy body disease subgroups have different clinical profiles. METHODS: Participants had dementia, autopsy-confirmed transitional or diffuse Lewy body disease (TLBD or DLBD) (n = 244), or Alzheimer disease (AD) (n = 210), and were seen at least twice (mean follow-up 6.2 ± 3.8 years). TLBD and DLBD groups were partitioned based on the presence or absence of neocortical neurofibrillary tangles using Braak staging. Four Lewy body disease subgroups and AD were compared on clinical features, dementia trajectory, and onset latency of probable dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) or a DLB syndrome defined as probable DLB or dementia with one core feature of parkinsonism or probable REM sleep behavior disorder. RESULTS: In TLBD and DLBD without neocortical tangles, diagnostic sensitivity was strong for probable DLB (87% TLBD, 96% DLBD) and the DLB syndrome (97% TLBD, 98% DLBD) with median latencies <1 year from cognitive onset, and worse baseline attention-visual processing but better memory-naming scores than AD. In DLBD with neocortical tangles, diagnostic sensitivity was 70% for probable DLB and 77% for the DLB syndrome with respective median latencies of 3.7 years and 2.7 years from cognitive onset, each associated with tangle distribution. This group had worse baseline attention-visual processing than AD, but comparable memory-naming impairment. TLBD with neocortical tangles had 48% diagnostic sensitivity for probable DLB and 52% for the DLB syndrome, with median latencies >6 years from cognitive onset, and were cognitively similar to AD. Dementia trajectory was slowest for TLBD without neocortical tangles, and fastest for DLBD with neocortical tangles. CONCLUSIONS: The phenotypic expression of DLB was associated with the distribution of α-synuclein and tau pathology.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Lewy body disease subgroups have different clinical profiles. METHODS: Participants had dementia, autopsy-confirmed transitional or diffuse Lewy body disease (TLBD or DLBD) (n = 244), or Alzheimer disease (AD) (n = 210), and were seen at least twice (mean follow-up 6.2 ± 3.8 years). TLBD and DLBD groups were partitioned based on the presence or absence of neocortical neurofibrillary tangles using Braak staging. Four Lewy body disease subgroups and AD were compared on clinical features, dementia trajectory, and onset latency of probable dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) or a DLB syndrome defined as probable DLB or dementia with one core feature of parkinsonism or probable REM sleep behavior disorder. RESULTS: In TLBD and DLBD without neocortical tangles, diagnostic sensitivity was strong for probable DLB (87% TLBD, 96% DLBD) and the DLB syndrome (97% TLBD, 98% DLBD) with median latencies <1 year from cognitive onset, and worse baseline attention-visual processing but better memory-naming scores than AD. In DLBD with neocortical tangles, diagnostic sensitivity was 70% for probable DLB and 77% for the DLB syndrome with respective median latencies of 3.7 years and 2.7 years from cognitive onset, each associated with tangle distribution. This group had worse baseline attention-visual processing than AD, but comparable memory-naming impairment. TLBD with neocortical tangles had 48% diagnostic sensitivity for probable DLB and 52% for the DLB syndrome, with median latencies >6 years from cognitive onset, and were cognitively similar to AD. Dementia trajectory was slowest for TLBD without neocortical tangles, and fastest for DLBD with neocortical tangles. CONCLUSIONS: The phenotypic expression of DLB was associated with the distribution of α-synuclein and tau pathology.
Authors: Brittany N Dugger; Bradley F Boeve; Melissa E Murray; Joseph E Parisi; Hiroshige Fujishiro; Dennis W Dickson; Tanis J Ferman Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: M L Kraybill; E B Larson; D W Tsuang; L Teri; W C McCormick; J D Bowen; W A Kukull; J B Leverenz; M M Cherrier Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-06-28 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: V Deramecourt; S Bombois; C-A Maurage; A Ghestem; H Drobecq; E Vanmechelen; F Lebert; F Pasquier; A Delacourte Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Kejal Kantarci; Tanis J Ferman; Bradley F Boeve; Stephen D Weigand; Scott Przybelski; Prashanthi Vemuri; Melissa E Murray; Melissa M Murray; Matthew L Senjem; Glenn E Smith; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; Joseph E Parisi; Dennis W Dickson Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: C F Lippa; J E Duda; M Grossman; H I Hurtig; D Aarsland; B F Boeve; D J Brooks; D W Dickson; B Dubois; M Emre; S Fahn; J M Farmer; D Galasko; J E Galvin; C G Goetz; J H Growdon; K A Gwinn-Hardy; J Hardy; P Heutink; T Iwatsubo; K Kosaka; V M-Y Lee; J B Leverenz; E Masliah; I G McKeith; R L Nussbaum; C W Olanow; B M Ravina; A B Singleton; C M Tanner; J Q Trojanowski; Z K Wszolek Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-03-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Pietro Tiraboschi; Johannes Attems; Alan Thomas; Andrew Brown; Evelyn Jaros; Debbie J Lett; Maria Ossola; Robert H Perry; Lynne Ramsay; Lauren Walker; Ian G McKeith Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-12-31 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: David R Howlett; David Whitfield; Mary Johnson; Johannes Attems; John T O'Brien; Dag Aarsland; Mitchell K P Lai; Jasinda H Lee; Christopher Chen; Clive Ballard; Tibor Hortobágyi; Paul T Francis Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 6.508
Authors: Toji Miyagawa; Scott A Przybelski; Daniela Maltais; Hoon-Ki Min; Lennon Jordan; Timothy G Lesnick; Qin Chen; Jonathan Graff-Radford; David Jones; Rodolfo Savica; David Knopman; Ronald Petersen; Walter K Kremers; Leah K Forsberg; Julie A Fields; Tanis J Ferman; Laura Allen; Joseph Parisi; R Ross Reichard; Melissa Murray; Dennis Dickson; Bradley F Boeve; Kejal Kantarci; Val J Lowe Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2020-12-15 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Sara Hall; Shorena Janelidze; Elisabet Londos; Antoine Leuzy; Erik Stomrud; Jeffrey L Dage; Oskar Hansson Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2020-12-07 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Qin Chen; Val J Lowe; Bradley F Boeve; Scott A Przybelski; Toji Miyagawa; Matthew L Senjem; Clifford R Jack; Timothy G Lesnick; Walter K Kremers; Julie A Fields; Hoon-Ki Min; Christopher G Schwarz; Jeffrey L Gunter; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Rodolfo Savica; David S Knopman; David Jones; Tanis J Ferman; Neill R Graff-Radford; Ronald C Petersen; Kejal Kantarci Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: E E Wolters; M van de Beek; R Ossenkoppele; S S V Golla; S C J Verfaillie; E M Coomans; T Timmers; D Visser; H Tuncel; F Barkhof; R Boellaard; A D Windhorst; W M van der Flier; Ph Scheltens; A W Lemstra; B N M van Berckel Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Gregory D Scott; Moriah R Arnold; Thomas G Beach; Christopher H Gibbons; Anumantha G Kanthasamy; Russell M Lebovitz; Afina W Lemstra; Leslie M Shaw; Charlotte E Teunissen; Henrik Zetterberg; Angela S Taylor; Todd C Graham; Bradley F Boeve; Stephen N Gomperts; Neill R Graff-Radford; Charbel Moussa; Kathleen L Poston; Liana S Rosenthal; Marwan N Sabbagh; Ryan R Walsh; Miriam T Weber; Melissa J Armstrong; Jee A Bang; Andrea C Bozoki; Kimiko Domoto-Reilly; John E Duda; Jori E Fleisher; Douglas R Galasko; James E Galvin; Jennifer G Goldman; Samantha K Holden; Lawrence S Honig; Daniel E Huddleston; James B Leverenz; Irene Litvan; Carol A Manning; Karen S Marder; Alexander Y Pantelyat; Victoria S Pelak; Douglas W Scharre; Sharon J Sha; Holly A Shill; Zoltan Mari; Joseph F Quinn; David J Irwin Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 4.086
Authors: Elie Matar; Simon R White; John-Paul Taylor; Alan Thomas; Ian G McKeith; Joseph P M Kane; Ajenthan Surendranathan; Glenda M Halliday; Simon J G Lewis; John T O'Brien Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Parichita Choudhury; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Jeremiah A Aakre; Lincoln Wurtz; David S Knopman; Neill R Graff-Radford; Kejal Kantarci; Leah K Forsberg; Julie A Fields; Otto Pedraza; Qin Chen; Toji Miyagawa; Gregory S Day; Philip Tipton; Rodolfo Savica; Hugo Botha; Christian Lachner; Brynn Dredla; R Ross Reichard; Ronald C Petersen; Dennis W Dickson; Bradley F Boeve; Tanis J Ferman Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 16.655
Authors: Carla Abdelnour; Daniel Ferreira; Afina W Lemstra; Eric Westman; Marleen van de Beek; Nira Cedres; Ketil Oppedal; Lena Cavallin; Frédéric Blanc; Olivier Bousiges; Lars-Olof Wahlund; Andrea Pilotto; Alessandro Padovani; Mercè Boada; Javier Pagonabarraga; Jaime Kulisevsky; Dag Aarsland Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 6.982