Paige Johnson1, Karen Wong2, Zhengjia Chen3, Zachary L Bercu4, Janice Newsome4, Derek L West4, Sean Dariushnia4, Laura K Findeiss4, Nima Kokabi4. 1. University of Arkansas School of Medicine, Little Rock, AR. Electronic address: PCJohnson@uams.edu. 2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. 3. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, Atlanta, GA. 4. Division of Interventional Radiology and Image Guided Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare vascular plugs to coil embolization of the proximal splenic artery and evaluate differences in radiation exposure to the patients. METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed for relevant studies from January 2000 to July 2018 that compared the efficacy of vascular plugs vs coils in splenic artery embolization. Only studies that investigated coil or vascular plug use, without combination with other embolic agents, were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed effects model approach with the inverse variance-weighted average method to determine pooled differences in time to vessel occlusion, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, total number of devices used, and radiation exposure. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I square statistic. Pooled outcomes were compared, and quality assessments were evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Eight studies met inclusion criteria. 81 patients were embolized with vascular plugs and 52 patients with coils only. The most common indication for splenic artery embolization was trauma. Time to vessel occlusion was shorter in the vascular plug group by 7.11 minutes (P = 0.003). Fluoroscopy time was shorter by 13.82 minutes in the vascular plug cohort, and these patients received less radiation (-439 mGy) compared to the coil group (P = 0.006 and P = 0.02, respectively). The number of devices was significantly fewer in the vascular plug group (-3.54; P < 0.001). Procedure time was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our data supports the vascular plug is superior to coils for embolization of the proximal splenic artery with respect to occlusion time, fluoroscopy time, patient radiation exposure, and number occlusive devices used.
PURPOSE: To compare vascular plugs to coil embolization of the proximal splenic artery and evaluate differences in radiation exposure to the patients. METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed for relevant studies from January 2000 to July 2018 that compared the efficacy of vascular plugs vs coils in splenic artery embolization. Only studies that investigated coil or vascular plug use, without combination with other embolic agents, were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed effects model approach with the inverse variance-weighted average method to determine pooled differences in time to vessel occlusion, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, total number of devices used, and radiation exposure. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I square statistic. Pooled outcomes were compared, and quality assessments were evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Eight studies met inclusion criteria. 81 patients were embolized with vascular plugs and 52 patients with coils only. The most common indication for splenic artery embolization was trauma. Time to vessel occlusion was shorter in the vascular plug group by 7.11 minutes (P = 0.003). Fluoroscopy time was shorter by 13.82 minutes in the vascular plug cohort, and these patients received less radiation (-439 mGy) compared to the coil group (P = 0.006 and P = 0.02, respectively). The number of devices was significantly fewer in the vascular plug group (-3.54; P < 0.001). Procedure time was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our data supports the vascular plug is superior to coils for embolization of the proximal splenic artery with respect to occlusion time, fluoroscopy time, patient radiation exposure, and number occlusive devices used.