V J Leung1, E M Godfrey2, D J Biddle2, A Al-Khatib2. 1. Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. Electronic address: v.leung@nhs.net. 2. Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Abstract
AIM: To assess vascular contrast enhancement and radiation dose of split-bolus single-pass computed tomography (CT) compared to single-bolus multi-pass CT for acquiring a multi-phasic study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent CT for acute pancreatitis were included retrospectively. Thirty consecutive patients scanned with a split-bolus protocol were compared to 30 consecutive patients scanned with a single-bolus protocol. Data were collected on attenuation measurements (aorta, portal vein and spleen) and images were assessed for subjective vascular enhancement quality and splenic homogeneity. Radiation dose was measured by dose-length product (DLP). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the aortic (p = 0.88) or portal vein (p = 0.35) attenuation values between the two groups. The percentage of examinations reaching the target aortic and portal attenuation in the split-bolus group were 96.7% and 93.3%, and in the single-bolus group were 96.7% and 85.7%, respectively. The mean DLP was 492 mGy.cm for the single-bolus group and 940 mGy.cm for the split-bolus group (p < 0.0001). Subjective assessment revealed higher rates of splenic heterogeneity in the split-bolus group. DISCUSSION: In acute pancreatitis, split-bolus imaging can produce arterial and venous enhancement comparable to a multi-pass technique with a significant reduction in radiation dose. Loss of temporal resolution and increased splenic heterogeneity are the main disadvantages. The low prevalence of pseudoaneurysms favours the lower-dose imaging technique.
AIM: To assess vascular contrast enhancement and radiation dose of split-bolus single-pass computed tomography (CT) compared to single-bolus multi-pass CT for acquiring a multi-phasic study. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients who underwent CT for acute pancreatitis were included retrospectively. Thirty consecutive patients scanned with a split-bolus protocol were compared to 30 consecutive patients scanned with a single-bolus protocol. Data were collected on attenuation measurements (aorta, portal vein and spleen) and images were assessed for subjective vascular enhancement quality and splenic homogeneity. Radiation dose was measured by dose-length product (DLP). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the aortic (p = 0.88) or portal vein (p = 0.35) attenuation values between the two groups. The percentage of examinations reaching the target aortic and portal attenuation in the split-bolus group were 96.7% and 93.3%, and in the single-bolus group were 96.7% and 85.7%, respectively. The mean DLP was 492 mGy.cm for the single-bolus group and 940 mGy.cm for the split-bolus group (p < 0.0001). Subjective assessment revealed higher rates of splenic heterogeneity in the split-bolus group. DISCUSSION: In acute pancreatitis, split-bolus imaging can produce arterial and venous enhancement comparable to a multi-pass technique with a significant reduction in radiation dose. Loss of temporal resolution and increased splenic heterogeneity are the main disadvantages. The low prevalence of pseudoaneurysms favours the lower-dose imaging technique.