Literature DB >> 32560744

AGILE-ACCORD: A Randomized, Multicentre, Seamless, Adaptive Phase I/II Platform Study to Determine the Optimal Dose, Safety and Efficacy of Multiple Candidate Agents for the Treatment of COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised platform trial.

Gareth Griffiths1, Richard Fitzgerald2, Thomas Jaki3, Andrea Corkhill4, Ellice Marwood4, Helen Reynolds5, Louise Stanton4, Sean Ewings4, Susannah Condie4, Emma Wrixon4, Andrea Norton6, Mike Radford4, Sara Yeats4, Jane Robertson4, Rachel Darby-Dowman7, Lauren Walker5, Saye Khoo5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Phase I - To determine the optimal dose of each candidate (or combination of candidates) entered into the platform. Phase II - To determine the efficacy and safety of each candidate entered into the platform, compared to the current Standard of Care (SoC), and recommend whether it should be evaluated further in a later phase II & III platforms. TRIAL
DESIGN: AGILE-ACCORD is a Bayesian multicentre, multi-arm, multi-dose, multi-stage open-label, adaptive, seamless phase I/II randomised platform trial to determine the optimal dose, activity and safety of multiple candidate agents for the treatment of COVID-19. Designed as a master protocol with each candidate being evaluated within its own sub-protocol (Candidate Specific Trial (CST) protocol), randomising between candidate and SoC with 2:1 allocation in favour of the candidate (N.B the first candidate has gone through regulatory approval and is expected to open to recruitment early summer 2020). Each dose will be assessed for safety sequentially in cohorts of 6 patients. Once a phase II dose has been identified we will assess efficacy by seamlessly expanding into a larger cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Patient populations can vary between CSTs, but the main eligibility criteria include adult patients (≥18 years) who have laboratory-confirmed infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We will include both severe and mild-moderate patients defined as follows: Group A (severe disease) - patients with WHO Working Group on the Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 infection 9-point ordinal scale of Grades 4 (hospitalised, oxygen by mask or nasal prongs), 5 (hospitalised, non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen), 6 (hospitalised, intubation and mechanical ventilation) or 7 (hospitalised, ventilation and additional organ support); Group B (mild-moderate disease) - ambulant or hospitalised patients with peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) >94% RA. If any CSTs are included in the community setting, the CST protocol will clarify whether patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection are also eligible. Participants will be recruited from England, North Ireland, Wales and Scotland. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Comparator is the current standard of care (SoC), in some CSTs plus placebo. Candidates that prevent uncontrolled cytokine release, prevention of viral replication, and other anti-viral treatment strategies are at various stages of development for inclusion into AGILE-ACCORD. Other CSTs will be added over time. There is not a set limit on the number of CSTs we can include within the AGILE-ACCORD Master protocol and we will upload each CST into this publication as each opens to recruitment. MAIN OUTCOMES: Phase I: Dose limiting toxicities using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5 Grade ≥3 adverse events. Phase II: Agreed on a CST basis depending on mechanism of action of the candidate and patient population. But may include; time to clinical improvement of at least 2 points on the WHO 9-point category ordinal scale [measured up to 29 days from randomisation], progression of disease (oxygen saturation (SaO2) <92%) or hospitalization or death, or change in time-weighted viral load [measured up to 29 days from randomisation]. RANDOMISATION: Varies with CST, but default is 2:1 allocation in favour of the candidate to maximise early safety data. BLINDING (MASKING): For the safety phase open-label although for some CSTs may include placebo or SoC for the efficacy phase. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): Varies between CSTs. However simulations have shown that around 16 participants are necessary to determine futility or promise of a candidate at a given dose (in efficacy evaluation alone) and between 32 and 40 participants are required across the dose-finding and efficacy evaluation when capping the maximum number of participants contributing to the evaluation of a treatment at 40. TRIAL STATUS: Master protocol version number v5 07 May 2020, trial is in setup with full regulatory approval and utilises several digital technology solutions, including Medidata's Rave EDC [electronic data capture], RTSM for randomisation and patient eConsent on iPads via Rave Patient Cloud. The recruitment dates will vary between CSTs but at the time of writing no CSTs are yet open for recruitment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2020-001860-27 14th March 2020 FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian; COVID-19; Master protocol; Phase I/II; Platform study; Randomised controlled trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32560744      PMCID: PMC7303573          DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04473-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trials        ISSN: 1745-6215            Impact factor:   2.279


Additional file 1. Full protocol.
  10 in total

Review 1.  SARS-CoV-2-neutralising monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID-19.

Authors:  Nina Kreuzberger; Caroline Hirsch; Khai Li Chai; Eve Tomlinson; Zahra Khosravi; Maria Popp; Miriam Neidhardt; Vanessa Piechotta; Susanne Salomon; Sarah J Valk; Ina Monsef; Christoph Schmaderer; Erica M Wood; Cynthia So-Osman; David J Roberts; Zoe McQuilten; Lise J Estcourt; Nicole Skoetz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-02

2.  Optimal dose and safety of molnupiravir in patients with early SARS-CoV-2: a Phase I, open-label, dose-escalating, randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Saye H Khoo; Richard Fitzgerald; Thomas Fletcher; Sean Ewings; Thomas Jaki; Rebecca Lyon; Nichola Downs; Lauren Walker; Olana Tansley-Hancock; William Greenhalf; Christie Woods; Helen Reynolds; Ellice Marwood; Pavel Mozgunov; Emily Adams; Katie Bullock; Wayne Holman; Marcin D Bula; Jennifer L Gibney; Geoffrey Saunders; Andrea Corkhill; Colin Hale; Kerensa Thorne; Justin Chiong; Susannah Condie; Henry Pertinez; Wendy Painter; Emma Wrixon; Lucy Johnson; Sara Yeats; Kim Mallard; Mike Radford; Keira Fines; Victoria Shaw; Andrew Owen; David G Lalloo; Michael Jacobs; Gareth Griffiths
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 5.758

Review 3.  Review on molnupiravir as a promising oral drug for the treatment of COVID-19.

Authors:  Elham Zarenezhad; Mahrokh Marzi
Journal:  Med Chem Res       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.351

4.  Enrichment Bayesian design for randomized clinical trials using categorical biomarkers and a binary outcome.

Authors:  Valentin Vinnat; Sylvie Chevret
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 5.  Potential repurposed SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection drugs.

Authors:  Gamal El-Din A Abuo-Rahma; Mamdouh F A Mohamed; Tarek S Ibrahim; Mai E Shoman; Ebtihal Samir; Rehab M Abd El-Baky
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 6.  Molnupiravir: A lethal mutagenic drug against rapidly mutating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-A narrative review.

Authors:  Sri Masyeni; Muhammad Iqhrammullah; Andri Frediansyah; Firzan Nainu; Trina Tallei; Talha Bin Emran; Youdiil Ophinni; Kuldeep Dhama; Harapan Harapan
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 20.693

7.  A randomized, open-label trial of combined nitazoxanide and atazanavir/ritonavir for mild to moderate COVID-19.

Authors:  Adeola Fowotade; Folasade Bamidele; Boluwatife Egbetola; Adeniyi F Fagbamigbe; Babatunde A Adeagbo; Bolanle O Adefuye; Ajibola Olagunoye; Temitope O Ojo; Akindele O Adebiyi; Omobolanle I Olagunju; Olabode T Ladipo; Abdulafeez Akinloye; Adedeji Onayade; Oluseye O Bolaji; Steve Rannard; Christian Happi; Andrew Owen; Adeniyi Olagunju
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-08

8.  Efficient Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials of Interventions for COVID-19.

Authors:  Nigel Stallard; Lisa Hampson; Norbert Benda; Werner Brannath; Thomas Burnett; Tim Friede; Peter K Kimani; Franz Koenig; Johannes Krisam; Pavel Mozgunov; Martin Posch; James Wason; Gernot Wassmer; John Whitehead; S Faye Williamson; Sarah Zohar; Thomas Jaki
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 1.452

9.  Practical recommendations for implementing a Bayesian adaptive phase I design during a pandemic.

Authors:  Sean Ewings; Geoff Saunders; Thomas Jaki; Pavel Mozgunov
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  An Open Label, Adaptive, Phase 1 Trial of High-Dose Oral Nitazoxanide in Healthy Volunteers: An Antiviral Candidate for SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Lauren E Walker; Richard FitzGerald; Geoffrey Saunders; Rebecca Lyon; Michael Fisher; Karen Martin; Izabela Eberhart; Christie Woods; Sean Ewings; Colin Hale; Rajith K R Rajoli; Laura Else; Sujan Dilly-Penchala; Alieu Amara; David G Lalloo; Michael Jacobs; Henry Pertinez; Parys Hatchard; Robert Waugh; Megan Lawrence; Lucy Johnson; Keira Fines; Helen Reynolds; Timothy Rowland; Rebecca Crook; Emmanuel Okenyi; Kelly Byrne; Pavel Mozgunov; Thomas Jaki; Saye Khoo; Andrew Owen; Gareth Griffiths; Thomas E Fletcher
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 6.903

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.