Literature DB >> 32560558

Automated Classification of Significant Prostate Cancer on MRI: A Systematic Review on the Performance of Machine Learning Applications.

Jose M Castillo T1, Muhammad Arif1, Wiro J Niessen1,2, Ivo G Schoots1,3, Jifke F Veenland1,4.   

Abstract

Significant prostate carcinoma (sPCa) classification based on MRI using radiomics or deep learning approaches has gained much interest, due to the potential application in assisting in clinical decision-making.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature (i) to determine which algorithms are most frequently used for sPCa classification, (ii) to investigate whether there exists a relation between the performance and the method or the MRI sequences used, (iii) to assess what study design factors affect the performance on sPCa classification, and (iv) to research whether performance had been evaluated in a clinical setting
Methods: The databases Embase and Ovid MEDLINE were searched for studies describing machine learning or deep learning classification methods discriminating between significant and nonsignificant PCa on multiparametric MRI that performed a valid validation procedure. Quality was assessed by the modified radiomics quality score. We computed the median area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) from overall methods and the interquartile range.
RESULTS: From 2846 potentially relevant publications, 27 were included. The most frequent algorithms used in the literature for PCa classification are logistic regression (22%) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) (22%). The median AUC was 0.79 (interquartile range: 0.77-0.87). No significant effect of number of included patients, image sequences, or reference standard on the reported performance was found. Three studies described an external validation and none of the papers described a validation in a prospective clinical trial.
CONCLUSIONS: To unlock the promising potential of machine and deep learning approaches, validation studies and clinical prospective studies should be performed with an established protocol to assess the added value in decision-making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gleason score; classification; clinically significant; deep learning; machine learning; model; mpMRI; prediction; prostate carcinoma; radiomics; systematic review

Year:  2020        PMID: 32560558     DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  11 in total

1.  Biparametric prostate MRI: impact of a deep learning-based software and of quantitative ADC values on the inter-reader agreement of experienced and inexperienced readers.

Authors:  Stefano Cipollari; Martina Pecoraro; Alì Forookhi; Ludovica Laschena; Marco Bicchetti; Emanuele Messina; Sara Lucciola; Carlo Catalano; Valeria Panebianco
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 6.313

2.  Current progress and quality of radiomic studies for predicting EGFR mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer using PET/CT images: a systematic review.

Authors:  Meilinuer Abdurixiti; Mayila Nijiati; Rongfang Shen; Qiu Ya; Naibijiang Abuduxiku; Mayidili Nijiati
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.629

3.  Deep Learning in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Whole-Mount Histopathology Referenced Delineations.

Authors:  Danyan Li; Xiaowei Han; Jie Gao; Qing Zhang; Haibo Yang; Shu Liao; Hongqian Guo; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-13

4.  Machine and Deep Learning Prediction Of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Elena Bertelli; Laura Mercatelli; Chiara Marzi; Eva Pachetti; Michela Baccini; Andrea Barucci; Sara Colantonio; Luca Gherardini; Lorenzo Lattavo; Maria Antonietta Pascali; Simone Agostini; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Classification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multi-Parametric MRI: A Validation Study Comparing Deep Learning and Radiomics.

Authors:  Jose M Castillo T; Muhammad Arif; Martijn P A Starmans; Wiro J Niessen; Chris H Bangma; Ivo G Schoots; Jifke F Veenland
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  Comparative performance of fully-automated and semi-automated artificial intelligence methods for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer on MRI: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Roberts; Leonardo Rundo; Nikita Sushentsev; Nadia Moreira Da Silva; Michael Yeung; Tristan Barrett; Evis Sala
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-03-28

Review 7.  The emerging potentials of lncRNA DRAIC in human cancers.

Authors:  Qinfan Yao; Xiuyuan Zhang; Dajin Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  Machine Learning and Clinical-Radiological Characteristics for the Classification of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS 3 Lesions.

Authors:  Michela Gravina; Lorenzo Spirito; Giuseppe Celentano; Marco Capece; Massimiliano Creta; Gianluigi Califano; Claudia Collà Ruvolo; Simone Morra; Massimo Imbriaco; Francesco Di Bello; Antonio Sciuto; Renato Cuocolo; Luigi Napolitano; Roberto La Rocca; Vincenzo Mirone; Carlo Sansone; Nicola Longo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28

9.  Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Models for Predicting P504s/P63 Immunohistochemical Expression: A Noninvasive Diagnostic Tool for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yun-Fan Liu; Xin Shu; Xiao-Feng Qiao; Guang-Yong Ai; Li Liu; Jun Liao; Shuang Qian; Xiao-Jing He
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 10.  Artificial Intelligence Based Algorithms for Prostate Cancer Classification and Detection on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jasper J Twilt; Kicky G van Leeuwen; Henkjan J Huisman; Jurgen J Fütterer; Maarten de Rooij
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.