Alice Masini1, Sofia Marini2, Erica Leoni1, Giovanni Lorusso1, Stefania Toselli3, Alessia Tessari4, Andrea Ceciliani2, Laura Dallolio1. 1. Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Bologna Via San Giacomo, 12, 40126 Bologna, Italy. 2. Department of Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, Campus of Rimini, Rimini Corso d'Augusto 237, 47921 Rimini, Italy. 3. Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Bologna Via Selmi, 3, 40126 Bologna, Italy. 4. Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna Viale Berti Pichat, 5, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Abstract
Background: The school gives access to children, regardless of age, ethnicity, gender and socio-economic class and can be identified as the key environment in which to promote children's physical activity (PA). The guidelines of the European Union recommend accumulating at least 10-min bouts of PA to reach the daily 60 min. Active breaks (ABs) led by teachers inside the classroom represent a good strategy to promote PA. The aim of this pilot and feasibility study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness in terms of PA level of an AB programme in children aged 8-9 years attending primary school. Methods: A pre-post quasi-experimental pilot and feasibility study was performed in two primary school classes, one of which was assigned to a 14-week AB intervention (AB group) and the other to the control group (CG). At baseline and at follow-up, children were monitored for sedentary and motor activity during an entire week using ActiGraph Accelerometer (ActiLife6 wGT3X-BT). The satisfaction of children and teachers was assessed by self-administered questionnaires. Results: In the pre-post comparison, AB group (n = 16) showed a reduction in the minutes spent in weekly sedentary activity (-168.7 min, p > 0.05), an increase in the number of step counts (+14,026.9, p < 0.05) and in time spent in moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA): weekly MVPA: +64.4 min, daily MVPA: +8.05 min, percentage of MVPA: +0.70%. On the contrary, CG showed a worsening in all variables. ANCOVA analysis, after adjusting for baseline values, showed significant differences between the AB group and CG for time spent in MVPA, percentage of MVPA and step counts. The satisfaction of children and teachers was good. Teachers were able to adapt the AB protocol to the needs of the school curriculum, thus confirming the feasibility of the AB programme. Conclusions: This pilot and feasibility study showed the feasibility and effectiveness of the AB protocol and represented the basis for a future controlled trial.
RCT Entities:
Background: The school gives access to children, regardless of age, ethnicity, gender and socio-economic class and can be identified as the key environment in which to promote children's physical activity (PA). The guidelines of the European Union recommend accumulating at least 10-min bouts of PA to reach the daily 60 min. Active breaks (ABs) led by teachers inside the classroom represent a good strategy to promote PA. The aim of this pilot and feasibility study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness in terms of PA level of an AB programme in children aged 8-9 years attending primary school. Methods: A pre-post quasi-experimental pilot and feasibility study was performed in two primary school classes, one of which was assigned to a 14-week AB intervention (AB group) and the other to the control group (CG). At baseline and at follow-up, children were monitored for sedentary and motor activity during an entire week using ActiGraph Accelerometer (ActiLife6 wGT3X-BT). The satisfaction of children and teachers was assessed by self-administered questionnaires. Results: In the pre-post comparison, AB group (n = 16) showed a reduction in the minutes spent in weekly sedentary activity (-168.7 min, p > 0.05), an increase in the number of step counts (+14,026.9, p < 0.05) and in time spent in moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA): weekly MVPA: +64.4 min, daily MVPA: +8.05 min, percentage of MVPA: +0.70%. On the contrary, CG showed a worsening in all variables. ANCOVA analysis, after adjusting for baseline values, showed significant differences between the AB group and CG for time spent in MVPA, percentage of MVPA and step counts. The satisfaction of children and teachers was good. Teachers were able to adapt the AB protocol to the needs of the school curriculum, thus confirming the feasibility of the AB programme. Conclusions: This pilot and feasibility study showed the feasibility and effectiveness of the AB protocol and represented the basis for a future controlled trial.
Entities:
Keywords:
accelerometers; children; moderate to vigorous physical activity; school based intervention
Authors: María Mendoza-Muñoz; Violeta Calle-Guisado; Raquel Pastor-Cisneros; Sabina Barrios-Fernandez; Jorge Rojo-Ramos; Alejandro Vega-Muñoz; Nicolás Contreras-Barraza; Jorge Carlos-Vivas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Chloe Emonson; Nicole Papadopoulos; Nicole Rinehart; Ana Mantilla; Ian Fuelscher; Lynne M Boddy; Caterina Pesce; Jane McGillivray Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Francesca Gallè; Pierluigi Pecoraro; Patrizia Calella; Giuseppe Cerullo; Maria Imoletti; Teresa Mastantuono; Espedita Muscariello; Roberta Ricchiuti; Serena Sensi; Carmelina Sorrentino; Giorgio Liguori; Giuliana Valerio Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 3.390