S Patodia1,2, M Tachrount3,4, A Somani1,2, I Scheffer5, T Yousry3, X Golay3, S M Sisodiya2,6, M Thom1,2. 1. Department of Neuropathology, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK. 2. Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK. 3. Neuroradiology Academic Unit, Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK. 4. FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 5. Department of Medicine (Neurology), Epilepsy Research Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 6. Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, Chalfont St Peter, UK.
Abstract
AIMS: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) likely arises as a result of autonomic dysfunction around the time of a seizure. In vivo MRI studies report volume reduction in the medulla and other brainstem autonomic regions. Our aim, in a pathology series, is to correlate regional quantitative features on 9.4T MRI with pathology measures in medullary regions. METHODS: Forty-seven medullae from 18 SUDEP, 18 nonepilepsy controls and 11 epilepsy controls were studied. In 16 cases, representing all three groups, ex vivo 9.4T MRI of the brainstem was carried out. Five regions of interest (ROI) were delineated, including the reticular formation zone (RtZ), and actual and relative volumes (RV), as well as T1, T2, T2* and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) measurements were evaluated on MRI. On serial sections, actual and RV estimates using Cavalieri stereological method and immunolabelling indices for myelin basic protein, synaptophysin and Microtubule associated protein 2 (MAP2) were carried out in similar ROI. RESULTS: Lower relative RtZ volumes in the rostral medulla but higher actual volumes in the caudal medulla were observed in SUDEP (P < 0.05). No differences between groups for T1, T2, T2* and MTR values in any region was seen but a positive correlation between T1 values and MAP2 labelling index in RtZ (P < 0.05). Significantly lower MAP2 LI were noted in the rostral medulla RtZ in epilepsy cases (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Rostro-caudal alterations of medullary volume in SUDEP localize with regions containing respiratory regulatory nuclei. They may represent seizure-related alterations, relevant to the pathophysiology of SUDEP.
AIMS: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) likely arises as a result of autonomic dysfunction around the time of a seizure. In vivo MRI studies report volume reduction in the medulla and other brainstem autonomic regions. Our aim, in a pathology series, is to correlate regional quantitative features on 9.4T MRI with pathology measures in medullary regions. METHODS: Forty-seven medullae from 18 SUDEP, 18 nonepilepsy controls and 11 epilepsy controls were studied. In 16 cases, representing all three groups, ex vivo 9.4T MRI of the brainstem was carried out. Five regions of interest (ROI) were delineated, including the reticular formation zone (RtZ), and actual and relative volumes (RV), as well as T1, T2, T2* and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) measurements were evaluated on MRI. On serial sections, actual and RV estimates using Cavalieri stereological method and immunolabelling indices for myelin basic protein, synaptophysin and Microtubule associated protein 2 (MAP2) were carried out in similar ROI. RESULTS: Lower relative RtZ volumes in the rostral medulla but higher actual volumes in the caudal medulla were observed in SUDEP (P < 0.05). No differences between groups for T1, T2, T2* and MTR values in any region was seen but a positive correlation between T1 values and MAP2 labelling index in RtZ (P < 0.05). Significantly lower MAP2 LI were noted in the rostral medulla RtZ in epilepsy cases (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Rostro-caudal alterations of medullary volume in SUDEP localize with regions containing respiratory regulatory nuclei. They may represent seizure-related alterations, relevant to the pathophysiology of SUDEP.
Authors: Francesco Deleo; Maria Thom; Luis Concha; Andrea Bernasconi; Boris C Bernhardt; Neda Bernasconi Journal: Epilepsy Res Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Jeffrey C Smith; Ana P L Abdala; Anke Borgmann; Ilya A Rybak; Julian F R Paton Journal: Trends Neurosci Date: 2012-12-17 Impact factor: 13.837
Authors: Marian Galovic; Victor Q H van Dooren; Tjardo S Postma; Sjoerd B Vos; Lorenzo Caciagli; Giuseppe Borzì; Juana Cueva Rosillo; Khue Anh Vuong; Jane de Tisi; Parashkev Nachev; John S Duncan; Matthias J Koepp Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Nicholas J Burgraff; Suzanne E Neumueller; Kirstyn J Buchholz; John LeClaire; Matthew R Hodges; Lawrence Pan; Hubert V Forster Journal: FASEB J Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 5.834
Authors: L A Massey; M A Miranda; O Al-Helli; H G Parkes; J S Thornton; P-W So; M J White; L Mancini; C Strand; J Holton; A J Lees; T Revesz; T A Yousry Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Kyle T S Pattinson; Georgios D Mitsis; Ann K Harvey; Saad Jbabdi; Sharon Dirckx; Stephen D Mayhew; Richard Rogers; Irene Tracey; Richard G Wise Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-09-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Smriti Patodia; Alyma Somani; Joan Liu; Alice Cattaneo; Beatrice Paradiso; Maria Garcia; Muhammad Othman; Beate Diehl; Orrin Devinsky; James D Mills; Jackie Foong; Maria Thom Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 7.611