| Literature DB >> 32558199 |
Roslyn B Mannon1, Brian Armstrong2, Peter G Stock3, Aneesh K Mehta4,5, Alton B Farris4, Natasha Watson6, Yvonne Morrison6, Minnie Sarwal3, Tara Sigdel3, Nancy Bridges6, Mark Robien6, Kenneth A Newell4, Christian P Larsen4.
Abstract
Immunosuppression devoid of corticosteroids has been investigated to avoid long-term comorbidities. Likewise, alternatives to calcineurin inhibitors have been investigated as a strategy to improve long-term kidney function following transplanion. Costimulatory blockade strategies that include corticosteroids have recently shown promise, despite their higher rates of early acute rejection. We designed a randomized clinical trial utilizing depletional induction therapy to mitigate early rejection risk while limiting calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids. This trial, Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation 16 (CTOT-16), sought to evaluate novel belatacept-based strategies employing tacrolimus and corticosteroid avoidance. Sixty-nine kidney transplant recipients were randomized from 4 US transplant centers comparing a control group of with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction, rapid steroid taper, and maintenance mycophenolate and tacrolimus, to 2 arms using maintenance belatacept. There were no graft losses but there were 2 deaths in the control group. However, the trial was halted early because of rejection in the belatacept treatment groups. Serious adverse events were similar across groups. Although rejection was not uniform in the belatacept maintenance therapy groups, the frequency of rejection limits the practical implementation of this strategy to avoid both calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids at this time.Entities:
Keywords: clinical research/practice; clinical trial; costimulation; immunosuppressant - fusion proteins and monoclonal antibodies: belatacept; immunosuppression/immune modulation; kidney transplantation / nephrology; rejection: T cell-mediated (TCMR)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32558199 PMCID: PMC7710570 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN: 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086