Literature DB >> 3255797

Cortical contrast gain control in human spatial vision.

P Bobak1, I Bodis-Wollner, M S Marx.   

Abstract

1. We evaluated human visual cortical contrast gain using visual evoked potential (VEP) measurements. The steady-state VEP was elicited by 7.5 Hz contrast modulation of a 6 cycles/deg sinusoidal grating. The stimulus may be regarded as the sum of a steady grating (C) and a counterphase grating of the same spatial frequency (delta C). The counterphase grating is modulated sinusoidally in time. 2. The VEP was measured to combinations of different modulation contrasts (delta C) and different mean levels of grating contrast (C) which produced stimuli with contrast modulation depths (delta C/C) ranging from 0.0625 to 1.0 ('on-off'). 3. The VEP signals were Fourier analysed and the amplitude and phase of the first (7.5 Hz) and second (15 Hz) harmonic frequency components were examined. The monocular VEP to a contrast-modulated grating contains significant first and second harmonic frequency components. 4. The amplitude and phase of the monocular VEP was plotted as a function of delta C for each mean level of contrast explored. The amplitudes of both the first and second harmonic frequency components grow with increasing delta C. However, the slope of each function depends on the mean contrast (C): with higher levels of C, the slope of the function is more shallow. Furthermore, at each level of C the amplitude of the first harmonic frequency saturates at a lower delta C than does the second harmonic frequency component. VEP amplitude is therefore not determined by the absolute contrast change (delta C) alone. The VEP phase of the first harmonic frequency shows less dependence on either modulation or on mean contrast; the phase of the second harmonic frequency component is strongly dependent on mean contrast (C) but not on delta C. 5. When the second harmonic amplitude component of the VEP response (R) is expressed as Ractual/Rmax, where Rmax is the response to C = delta C (i.e. 'on-off'), all second harmonic VEP functions can be well fitted with a power function. This is not the case for the function of the first harmonic amplitude data. 6. A dichoptic VEP was obtained by presenting the steady and counterphase gratings to opposite eyes. The dichoptic VEP, in distinction to the monocular VEP, contains only a second harmonic frequency component. The amplitude of the second harmonic frequency component grows with increasing delta C, similar to the function seen for the monocular VEP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3255797      PMCID: PMC1190983          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  13 in total

1.  VISUAL ADAPTATION.

Authors:  W A RUSHTON
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1965-03-16

2.  Contrast evoked responses in man.

Authors:  H Spekreijse; L H van der Twell; T Zuidema
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Electrophysiological and psychophysical responses to modulation of contrast of a grating pattern.

Authors:  I Bodis-Wollner; C D Hendley; J J Kulikowski
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Clustered intrinsic connections in cat visual cortex.

Authors:  C D Gilbert; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  VEPs in humans reveal high and low spatial contrast mechanisms.

Authors:  P Bobak; I Bodis-Wollner; C Harnois; J Thornton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  R M Shapley; J D Victor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  E Kaplan; R M Shapley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  On the separability of two mechanisms involved in the detection of grating patterns in humans.

Authors:  I Bodis-Wollner; C D Hendley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Visual adaptation in monkey cones: recordings of late receptor potentials.

Authors:  R M Boynton; D N Whitten
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-12-25       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  3 in total

1.  Contrast adaptation and contrast gain control.

Authors:  L M Määttänen; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Evidence for metaplasticity in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Tommaso Bocci; Matteo Caleo; Silvia Tognazzi; Nikita Francini; Lucia Briscese; Lamberto Maffei; Simone Rossi; Alberto Priori; Ferdinando Sartucci
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Toluene inhalation exposure for 13 weeks causes persistent changes in electroretinograms of Long-Evans rats.

Authors:  William K Boyes; Mark Bercegeay; Laura Degn; Tracey E Beasley; Paul A Evansky; Jean Claude Mwanza; Andrew M Geller; Charles Pinckney; T Michael Nork; Philip J Bushnell
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.294

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.