Literature DB >> 32557490

Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ishita Barua1, Daniela Guerrero Vinsard2,3, Henriette C Jodal1, Magnus Løberg1, Mette Kalager1, Øyvind Holme1, Masashi Misawa4, Michael Bretthauer1, Yuichi Mori1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based polyp detection systems are used during colonoscopy with the aim of increasing lesion detection and improving colonoscopy quality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials to determine the value of AI-based polyp detection systems for detection of polyps and colorectal cancer. We performed systematic searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Independent reviewers screened studies and assessed eligibility, certainty of evidence, and risk of bias. We compared colonoscopy with and without AI by calculating relative and absolute risks and mean differences for detection of polyps, adenomas, and colorectal cancer.
RESULTS: Five randomized trials were eligible for analysis. Colonoscopy with AI increased adenoma detection rates (ADRs) and polyp detection rates (PDRs) compared to colonoscopy without AI (values given with 95 %CI). ADR with AI was 29.6 % (22.2 % - 37.0 %) versus 19.3 % (12.7 % - 25.9 %) without AI; relative risk (RR] 1.52 (1.31 - 1.77), with high certainty. PDR was 45.4 % (41.1 % - 49.8 %) with AI versus 30.6 % (26.5 % - 34.6 %) without AI; RR 1.48 (1.37 - 1.60), with high certainty. There was no difference in detection of advanced adenomas (mean advanced adenomas per colonoscopy 0.03 for each group, high certainty). Mean adenomas detected per colonoscopy was higher for small adenomas (≤ 5 mm) for AI versus non-AI (mean difference 0.15 [0.12 - 0.18]), but not for larger adenomas (> 5 - ≤ 10 mm, mean difference 0.03 [0.01 - 0.05]; > 10 mm, mean difference 0.01 [0.00 - 0.02]; high certainty). Data on cancer are unavailable.
CONCLUSIONS: AI-based polyp detection systems during colonoscopy increase detection of small nonadvanced adenomas and polyps, but not of advanced adenomas. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32557490     DOI: 10.1055/a-1201-7165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   9.776


  23 in total

Review 1.  Current status and limitations of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Hann; Joel Troya; Daniel Fitting
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arun Sivananthan; Scarlet Nazarian; Lakshmana Ayaru; Kinesh Patel; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Nisha Patel
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  Real-time computer aided colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

Authors:  Babu P Mohan; Antonio Facciorusso; Shahab R Khan; Saurabh Chandan; Lena L Kassab; Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Georgios Tziatzios; Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-11-21

4.  Polyp Detection from Colorectum Images by Using Attentive YOLOv5.

Authors:  Jingjing Wan; Bolun Chen; Yongtao Yu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-03

Review 5.  Large polyps: Pearls for the referring and receiving endoscopist.

Authors:  Eric Markarian; Brian M Fung; Mohit Girotra; James H Tabibian
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-12-16

6.  Artificial Intelligence-Aid Colonoscopy Vs. Conventional Colonoscopy for Polyp and Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review of 7 Discordant Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Hui Pan; Mingyan Cai; Qi Liao; Yong Jiang; Yige Liu; Xiaolong Zhuang; Ying Yu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-13

7.  EndoConf: real-time video consultation during endoscopy; telemedicine in endoscopy at its best.

Authors:  Ulrik Deding; Anders Høgh; Niels Buch; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Gunnar Baatrup; Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-11-12

8.  Establishing key research questions for the implementation of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: a modified Delphi method.

Authors:  Omer F Ahmad; Yuichi Mori; Masashi Misawa; Shin-Ei Kudo; John T Anderson; Jorge Bernal; Tyler M Berzin; Raf Bisschops; Michael F Byrne; Peng-Jen Chen; James E East; Tom Eelbode; Daniel S Elson; Suryakanth R Gurudu; Aymeric Histace; William E Karnes; Alessandro Repici; Rajvinder Singh; Pietro Valdastri; Michael B Wallace; Pu Wang; Danail Stoyanov; Laurence B Lovat
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 9.  Development of artificial intelligence technology in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Feng Liang; Shu Wang; Kai Zhang; Tong-Jun Liu; Jian-Nan Li
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-01-15

10.  Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of polyp detection.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Xinjue He; Jianbo Zhou; Jie Zhang; Xinli Mao; Guoliang Ye; Qiang Chen; Feng Xu; Jianzhong Sang; Jun Wang; Yong Ding; Youming Li; Chaohui Yu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.