Literature DB >> 32556766

Learning curve of robot-assisted choledochal cyst excision in pediatrics: report of 60 cases.

Xiaolong Xie1, Liwei Feng1, Kewei Li1, Chuan Wang1, Bo Xiang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little data are available to assess the learning curve for robot-assisted surgery on choledochal cysts. The aim of this current study is to investigate the characteristics of the learning curve for robot-assisted choledochal cyst excisions using the da Vinci (SI) surgical system in pediatrics.
METHODS: A retrospectively collected database comprising all medical records of the first 60 consecutive patients undergoing a robot-assisted choledochal cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy using the da Vinci (SI) surgical system performed by one individual surgeon was studied. Baseline information and postoperative outcomes were collected and then learning curves were analyzed using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method. Patients were divided into two groups including group A and group B according to the cutoff points of the learning curve. Intraoperative characteristics and short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: CUSUM plots revealed that the cutoff point of the learning curve was 14 cases. Comparison of the operative time between the two groups revealed that the total operative time (203.71 ± 15.27, 171.28 ± 3.62 min, P < 0.001), docking time (23.79 ± 5.81, 14.50 ± 0.98 min, P < 0.001), and console time (151.86 ± 9.77, 129.15 ± 2.96 min, P < 0.001) were decreased significantly. The intraoperative bleeding (20.36 ± 7.46 vs. 20.43 ± 9.18, P = 0.977), time to taking water (2.89 ± 0.22 vs. 3.04 ± 0.34, P = 0.115), time to starting solids diet (3.73 ± 0.17 vs. 3.79 ± 0.26, P = 0.387), hospital stay (7.51 ± 1.12 vs. 7.54 ± 0.95, P = 0.910), and the postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The learning curve for the robot-assisted choledochal cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy in children is 14 cases. This learning curve can be used as the basis for performance guidance during training in future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pediatrics; Robot-assisted choledochal cyst excision; The learning curve

Year:  2020        PMID: 32556766     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07695-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  28 in total

Review 1.  Choledochal cysts. A review of the cystic anomalies of the biliary tree.

Authors:  N A Olbourne
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Choledochal cysts: part 1 of 3: classification and pathogenesis.

Authors:  Janakie Singham; Eric M Yoshida; Charles H Scudamore
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Choledochal cysts: age of presentation, symptoms, and late complications related to Todani's classification.

Authors:  J S de Vries; S de Vries; D C Aronson; D K Bosman; E A J Rauws; A Bosma; H A Heij; D J Gouma; T M van Gulik
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Robot-assisted resection of choledochal cysts and hepaticojejunostomy in children less than 10 kg.

Authors:  Michael J Dawrant; Azad S Najmaldin; Naved K Alizai
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Epidemiology, presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of choledochal cysts in adults in an urban environment.

Authors:  Kevin Wiseman; Andrzej K Buczkowski; Stephen W Chung; Jason Francoeur; David Schaeffer; Charles H Scudamore
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 6.  Japanese clinical practice guidelines for congenital biliary dilatation.

Authors:  Hiroki Ishibashi; Mitsuo Shimada; Terumi Kamisawa; Hideki Fujii; Yoshinori Hamada; Masayuki Kubota; Naoto Urushihara; Itaru Endo; Masaki Nio; Tomoaki Taguchi; Hisami Ando
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 7.027

7.  Normal structure, variations, and anomalies of the pancreaticobiliary ducts of Koreans: a nationwide cooperative prospective study.

Authors:  Hong-Ja Kim; Myung-Hwan Kim; Sung-Koo Lee; Dong-Wan Seo; Yong-Tae Kim; Dong-Ki Lee; Si-Young Song; Im-Hwan Roe; Jin-Hong Kim; Jae-Bock Chung; Chang-Duck Kim; Chan-Sup Shim; Yong-Bum Yoon; Ung-Suk Yang; Jin-Kyung Kang; Young-Il Min
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Antenatal diagnosis and early surgery for choledochal cyst.

Authors:  C G Howell; J M Templeton; S Weiner; M Glassman; J M Betts; C L Witzleben
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Choledochal cysts: lessons from a 20 year experience.

Authors:  M D Stringer; A Dhawan; M Davenport; G Mieli-Vergani; A P Mowat; E R Howard
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Congenital choledochal cyst. Analysis of 1,433 patients in the Japanese literature.

Authors:  M Yamaguchi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of outcomes and safety of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted cyst excision and hepaticojejunostomy for choledochal cysts: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tong Yin; Suyun Chen; Qianqing Li; Ting Huang; Long Li; Mei Diao
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-02-26

2.  Trans-umbilical Single-Site Plus One Robotic Assisted Surgery for Choledochal Cyst in Children, a Comparing to Laparoscope-Assisted Procedure.

Authors:  Shan Lin; Jianglong Chen; Kunbin Tang; Yufeng He; Xinru Xu; Di Xu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Outcomes and comparations of pediatric surgery about choledochal cyst with robot-assisted procedures, laparoscopic procedures, and open procedures: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Siqi Xie; Yanbing Huang; Yuanbin He; Mingkun Liu; Dianming Wu; Yifan Fang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.569

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.