Literature DB >> 32556718

Echocardiographic L-wave as a prognostic indicator in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Ilan Merdler1, Eyal Richert2, Aviram Hochstadt1, Itamar Loewenstein1, Samuel Morgan1, Tamar Itach1, Yan Topilsky1, Ariel Finkelstein1, Michal Laufer-Perl1, Shmuel Banai1, Ben Sadeh3.   

Abstract

This study applies L-wave measurements of mid-diastolic trans-mitral flow. Although considered to be a marker of elevated filling pressure or delayed myocardial relaxation, its clinical and prognostic value is yet to be completely elucidated. It has been shown that transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) induces reverse remodeling and improves diastolic function and prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Our purpose was to evaluate the prognostic value of L-wave following TAVR. We examined clinical and echocardiographic data of patients undergoing TAVR. L-Wave presence and velocity were recorded at baseline and at 1 month and 6 months following TAVR. The effect of the procedure on L-wave measurements and its impact on mortality and other clinical outcomes were analyzed. A total of 502 patients (mean age 82.58 ± 5.9) undergoing TAVR were included. Patients with baseline L-wave (n = 68, 12%) had a smaller stroke volume index by 5.7 ± 2.3 ml/m2 (p = 0.01) as compared to patients without L-wave at baseline. L-waves disappeared In 35% and 70% of patients at 1 month and at 6 months respectively. Baseline L-wave velocity was 34.8 ± 11.5 (cm/s) and decreased significantly at follow-up examinations. Patients with persistent L-wave following TAVR had higher 3-year adjusted mortality rates (HR 5.7, 95% CI 3.7-8.9, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of survival was also statistically significant (p < 0.001). TAVR induces L-wave disappearance and a decrease in L-wave velocity in patients with severe AS. L-wave persistence following TAVR is an independent risk factor for mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Diastolic dysfunction; L-wave; TAVR

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32556718     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-01903-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  24 in total

1.  The mitral L-wave: a relatively common but ignored useful finding.

Authors:  Edmund Kenneth Kerut
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 1.724

Review 2.  Established and novel clinical applications of diastolic function assessment by echocardiography.

Authors:  Jae K Oh; Sung-Ji Park; Sherif F Nagueh
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.792

3.  E-wave generated intraventricular diastolic vortex to L-wave relation: model-based prediction with in vivo validation.

Authors:  Erina Ghosh; Shelton D Caruthers; Sándor J Kovács
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-06-05

4.  The mitral L wave: a marker of pseudonormal filling and predictor of heart failure in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Carolyn S P Lam; Lin Han; Jong-Won Ha; Jae K Oh; Lieng H Ling
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 5.  Diastolic heart failure can be diagnosed by comprehensive two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  Jae K Oh; Liv Hatle; A Jamil Tajik; William C Little
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  The role and clinical implications of diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Polydoros N Kampaktsis; Damianos G Kokkinidis; Shing-Chiu Wong; Manolis Vavuranakis; Nikolaos J Skubas; Richard B Devereux
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Triphasic mitral inflow velocity with middiastolic filling: clinical implications and associated echocardiographic findings.

Authors:  Jong-Won Ha; Jae K Oh; Margaret M Redfield; Keiji Ujino; James B Seward; A Jamil Tajik
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  Interrelationship of mid-diastolic mitral valve motion, pulmonary venous flow, and transmitral flow.

Authors:  G Keren; J S Meisner; J Sherez; E L Yellin; S Laniado
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  TAVI or No TAVI: identifying patients unlikely to benefit from transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Rishi Puri; Bernard Iung; David J Cohen; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 10.  Expanding TAVI to Low and Intermediate Risk Patients.

Authors:  Lisa Voigtländer; Moritz Seiffert
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.