Literature DB >> 32556572

Cerebral involvement in COVID-19 is associated with metabolic and coagulation derangements: an EEG study.

Giordano Cecchetti1,2,3, Marco Vabanesi1,2, Raffaella Chieffo1, Giovanna Fanelli1, Fabio Minicucci1, Federica Agosta3,4, Moreno Tresoldi5, Alberto Zangrillo4,6, Massimo Filippi7,8,9,10.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32556572      PMCID: PMC7299251          DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09958-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Sirs, In previous reports, clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection have been described, and risk factors for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and death have been proposed: among them, older age, comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus, neutrophilia and markers of end-organ and coagulation impairment [1]. Although mortality due to COVID-19 is mainly linked to visceral multi-organ failure, cerebral involvement might worsen the clinical picture. Up to 36% of patients with COVID-19 appear to have neurological manifestations, ranging from headache and dizziness to impaired consciousness and cerebrovascular events [2]. The EEG correlates of such manifestations are still not clear. We report a series of 18 consecutive COVID-19 patients, admitted to our Institution between March and April 2020, evaluated with basal electroencephalogram (EEG) to investigate infection-related neurologic manifestations. All patients had their COVID-19 diagnosis confirmed by means of duplo SARS-CoV-2 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on nasopharyngeal swabs, and compatible chest X-ray and/or CT scan. Patients were divided in three groups, according to the level of EEG background activity alteration on a three-grade scale [normal/mild (N = 5), moderate (N = 9) or severe (N = 4)] derived with modifications from Amodio et al. [3]. Neurological manifestations prompting EEG examination were transient loss of consciousness, seizures/spasms, delirium and coma, with different distribution in the patient groups; no subjects reported history of anosmia/ageusia. Demographic and clinical features of patients are reported in Table 1. The frequency of focal central nervous system (CNS) lesions at neuroimaging (CT and/or MRI scan) did not differ among groups. We observed generalized EEG slowing in 16/18 (88.9%) patients; an anterior (bifrontal) prevalence of slow waves was noted in 10/18 (55.6%) cases (Fig. S1), a finding observed also in metabolic encephalopathies [4]. Its presence and severity correlated with the degree of EEG alteration (p = 0.02, linear regression model). This kind of abnormalities has been recently observed also by Helms [5]. Only two patients presented with epileptiform discharges (one with operated high-grade glioma, one with coma and severe hypernatremia); no seizures were detected.
Table 1

Demographical data and main clinical results in patients stratified according to EEG alteration severity

Normal/mild EEG alteration (N = 5)Moderate EEG alteration (N = 9)Severe EEG alteration (N = 4)p valueEstimate ± SE
Sex: M/F4/15/42/20.60a
Age (years)62.4 ± 15.970.4 ± 8.864.3 ± 4.50.34a
Comorbidities
 Hypertension3/5 (60.0%)6/9 (66.7%)2/4 (50.0%)0.86a
 Diabetes2/5 (40.0%)2/9 (22.2%)0.38a
 Obesity1/9 (11.1%)1/4 (25.0%)0.51a
 CKD1/5 (20.0%)1/9 (11.1%)0.65a
 COPD1/9 (11.1%)1/4 (25.0%)0.51a
 Asthma1/9 (11.1%)1/4 (25.0%)0.51a
 Atrial fibrillation1/5 (20.0%)2/9 (22.2%)2/4 (50.0%)0.55a
 Other

IHD (2)

Lung cancer (1)

Focal CNS lesions at neuroimaging

2/5 (40.0%)

PRES (1)

Remote IPH (1)

4/9 (44.4%)

Glioblastoma (1)

Brain metastasis (1)

Traumatic SDH (1)

Remote hemispheric ischemic lesion (1)

1/4 (25.0%)

Anterior pontine demyelinating les. (1)

0.81a
Anosmia/ageusia
Disease onset-to-door (d)2.5 ± 3.05.8 ± 4.86.7 ± 2.50.30a
Disease onset-to-EEG (d)6.6 ± 7.613.3 ± 11.711.0 ± 9.90.56a
SpO2 at arrival (%)91 ± 486 ± 1366 ± 80.05b *–0.040 (0.019)
Invasive ventilation3/9 (33.3%)3/4 (75.0%)0.07a
Body temperature (°C)37.3 ± 1.536.8 ± 0.737.9 ± 0.50.49a
Heart rate (bpm)91 ± 1291 ± 1693 ± 240.75a
Outcome
 Alive, discharged2/5 (40.0%)1/9 (11.1%)0.17a
 Alive, in-hospital2/5 (40.0%)4/9 (44.4%)1/4 (25.0%)
 Deceased1/5 (20.0%)4/9 (44.4%)3/4 (75.0%)
Indication for EEGTransient LOC: 2/5Transient LOC: 3/90.03a *
Seizure/spasms: 2/5Seizure/spasms: 3/9
Delirium: 1/5Delirium: 1/9Delirium: 1/4
Coma: 2/9Coma: 3/4
EEG features
Anterior prevalence of diffuse slow waves
 Absent5/5 (100.0%)3/9 (33.3%)1/4 (25.0%)0.02b *0.56 ± 0.22
 Intermittent3/9 (33.3%)
 Continuous3/9 (33.3%)3/4 (75.0%)
Focal slowing1/5 (20.0%)5/9 (55.6%)1/4 (25.0%)0.37a
Epileptiform discharges1/9 (11.1%)1/4 (25.0%)0.51a
Seizures
Laboratory parameters
 WBC count (109/L)9.52 ± 5.6410.79 ± 6.5917.58 ± 2.070.045b *0.071 ± 0.033
 Ly count (109/L)1.24 ± 0.380.92 ± 0.520.93 ± 0.570.43b
 Hyper/hyponatremia1/5 (20.0%)6/9 (66.7%)3/4 (75.0%)0.05b *0.82 ± 0.40
 Creatinine (mg/dL)1.43 ± 0.201.52 ± 1.213.35 ± 2.070.024b *1.06 ± 0.42
 CRP (mg/L)46.5 ± 19.5130.8 ± 81.7114.6 ± 101.90.14b
 LDH (U/L)352 ± 86397 ± 154436 ± 1740.57b
 CK (U/L)130 ± 74428 ± 9271827 ± 33190.39b
 Albumin (g/L)25.4 ± 1.926.5 ± 5.524.7 ± 4.00.82b
 PT ratio1.08 ± 0.091.16 ± 0.251.68 ± 0.570.031b *1.12 ± 0.47
 APTT ratio1.01 ± 0.050.99 ± 0.081.51 ± 0.430.037b *1.58 ± 0.69
 d-dimer (µg/dL)1.86 ± 0.492.15 ± 1.9812.19 ± 9.580.028b *0.064 ± 0.025

Values are mean ± SD or N (%)

CKD chronic kidney disease, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, IHD ischemic heart disease, SDH subdural hematoma, d days, LOC loss of consciousness, WBC white blood cells, Ly lymphocyte, CRP C-reactive protein, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, CK creatine kinase, PRES posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, PT prothrombin time, APTT activated partial prothrombin time

aKruskal–Wallis rank sum test

bUnivariate linear regression model of the specified parameter on the level of EEG alteration (normal, mild, moderate, severe); the estimate of effect (± SE), when significant, is shown on the right column. For CK, log transformation was used.

Demographical data and main clinical results in patients stratified according to EEG alteration severity IHD (2) Lung cancer (1) 2/5 (40.0%) PRES (1) Remote IPH (1) 4/9 (44.4%) Glioblastoma (1) Brain metastasis (1) Traumatic SDH (1) Remote hemispheric ischemic lesion (1) 1/4 (25.0%) Anterior pontine demyelinating les. (1) Values are mean ± SD or N (%) CKD chronic kidney disease, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, IHD ischemic heart disease, SDH subdural hematoma, d days, LOC loss of consciousness, WBC white blood cells, Ly lymphocyte, CRP C-reactive protein, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, CK creatine kinase, PRES posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, PT prothrombin time, APTT activated partial prothrombin time aKruskal–Wallis rank sum test bUnivariate linear regression model of the specified parameter on the level of EEG alteration (normal, mild, moderate, severe); the estimate of effect (± SE), when significant, is shown on the right column. For CK, log transformation was used. According to clinical protocols, only one subject in our cohort underwent lumbar puncture to rule out acute encephalitis, with normal results (cells, protein and glucose) and negative RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2; in addition, bacterial and virologic assays were negative. In the remaining 17 subjects, lumbar puncture was not performed, since not indicated on the basis of clinical judgement. We visually screened vital and laboratory parameters for association with the degree of EEG alteration. Univariate linear regression models were built to evaluate the relationship between patient groups and selected parameters. Among vital parameters (including heart rate and body temperature), only oxygen saturation on room air (SpO2), measured at hospital admission appeared to be associated to the EEG abnormalities (Table 1, Fig. 1). As to laboratory parameters, a linear relationship with the severity of EEG alteration was observed for white blood cell (WBC) count, the presence of plasma sodium alterations, serum creatinine, and coagulation parameters (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and d-dimer) (Table 1, Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Plots of vital and laboratory parameters stratified by level of EEG background activity alteration. Only parameters with significant relationship at linear regression model (Table 1) are shown. SpO oxygen saturation on room air, WBC white blood cells, PT prothrombin time, APTT activated partial prothrombin time

Plots of vital and laboratory parameters stratified by level of EEG background activity alteration. Only parameters with significant relationship at linear regression model (Table 1) are shown. SpO oxygen saturation on room air, WBC white blood cells, PT prothrombin time, APTT activated partial prothrombin time We recorded for all but three patients the antibiotic and/or antiviral drugs administered at the time of EEG. We did not observe significant effects of drug-related toxicity in our cohort. Moreover, laboratory parameters most commonly associated to drug therapies did not appear to influence EEG alteration; association with creatinine may be correlated to aggressive diuretic therapy salvage protocols. Our findings suggest variable degrees of CNS involvement in COVID-19 patients. The presence of focal brain lesions did not appear to impact significantly on EEG background activity. Subjects with laboratory findings which have been associated to poor prognosis [1] showed more frequent CNS impairment, as reflected by EEG alterations. Moreover, lower values of oxygen saturation at admission were associated with more severe EEG abnormalities, suggesting that higher levels of hypoxemia, and possibly longer periods before access to cures, may contribute to brain dysfunction. Electroencephalogram (EEG) may therefore represent a useful tool to evaluate early cerebral involvement in COVID-19, especially in severe cases; a frequent finding in our cohort was an anterior prevalence of slow waves. We hypothesize that the main drivers of EEG alterations in these patients are metabolic and/or hypoxic encephalopathy, even if our data cannot exclude the contribution of cerebral microangiopathy, yet to be demonstrated. We believe that our data raise a warning against a delayed access to specialized cures in SARS-CoV-2 infection, in order to reduce the incidence of brain suffering. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Fig. S1 EEG recordings in two COVID-19 patients, showing diffuse slowing with anterior prevalence (boxes). a) EEG showing moderate background activity alteration, with minimal reactivity to auditory stimulation (“stimolo acustico”) in a patient with leukocytosis (17.7 × 10^9/L), increased creatinine (5.76 mg/dL), PT (2.1) and D-dimer (16.75 µg/dL). b) Severe EEG alteration. The arrow indicates a diffuse epileptiform discharge in a patient with hypernatremia (155 mmol/L) and leukocytosis (18 × 10^9/L) (PDF 2427 kb)
  5 in total

1.  Spectral versus visual EEG analysis in mild hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  P Amodio; P Marchetti; F Del Piccolo; M de Tourtchaninoff; P Varghese; C Zuliani; G Campo; A Gatta; J M Guérit
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  The electroencephalograph in liver disease.

Authors:  B G PARSONS-SMITH; W H SUMMERSKILL; A M DAWSON; S SHERLOCK
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1957-11-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Neurologic Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Ling Mao; Huijuan Jin; Mengdie Wang; Yu Hu; Shengcai Chen; Quanwei He; Jiang Chang; Candong Hong; Yifan Zhou; David Wang; Xiaoping Miao; Yanan Li; Bo Hu
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 18.302

4.  Risk Factors Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaomin Wu; Xiaoyan Chen; Yanping Cai; Jia'an Xia; Xing Zhou; Sha Xu; Hanping Huang; Li Zhang; Xia Zhou; Chunling Du; Yuye Zhang; Juan Song; Sijiao Wang; Yencheng Chao; Zeyong Yang; Jie Xu; Xin Zhou; Dechang Chen; Weining Xiong; Lei Xu; Feng Zhou; Jinjun Jiang; Chunxue Bai; Junhua Zheng; Yuanlin Song
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Neurologic Features in Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  Julie Helms; Stéphane Kremer; Hamid Merdji; Raphaël Clere-Jehl; Malika Schenck; Christine Kummerlen; Olivier Collange; Clotilde Boulay; Samira Fafi-Kremer; Mickaël Ohana; Mathieu Anheim; Ferhat Meziani
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 91.245

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Non-Invasive Multimodal Neuromonitoring in Non-Critically Ill Hospitalized Adult Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Denise Battaglini; Lavienraj Premraj; Samuel Huth; Jonathon Fanning; Glenn Whitman; Rakesh C Arora; Judith Bellapart; Diego Bastos Porto; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Jacky Y Suen; Gianluigi Li Bassi; John F Fraser; Rafael Badenes; Sung-Min Cho; Chiara Robba
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Blood neurofilament light chain and total tau levels at admission predict death in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Rebecca De Lorenzo; Nicola I Loré; Annamaria Finardi; Alessandra Mandelli; Daniela M Cirillo; Cristina Tresoldi; Francesco Benedetti; Fabio Ciceri; Patrizia Rovere-Querini; Giancarlo Comi; Massimo Filippi; Angelo A Manfredi; Roberto Furlan
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.682

3.  Association of Clinical, Biological, and Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings With Electroencephalographic Findings for Patients With COVID-19.

Authors:  Virginie Lambrecq; Aurélie Hanin; Esteban Munoz-Musat; Lydia Chougar; Salimata Gassama; Cécile Delorme; Louis Cousyn; Alaina Borden; Maria Damiano; Valerio Frazzini; Gilles Huberfeld; Frank Landgraf; Vi-Huong Nguyen-Michel; Phintip Pichit; Aude Sangare; Mario Chavez; Capucine Morélot-Panzini; Elise Morawiec; Mathieu Raux; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Pierre Rufat; Damien Galanaud; Jean-Christophe Corvol; Catherine Lubetzki; Benjamin Rohaut; Sophie Demeret; Nadya Pyatigorskaya; Lionel Naccache; Vincent Navarro
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

4.  Cognitive, EEG, and MRI features of COVID-19 survivors: a 10-month study.

Authors:  Giordano Cecchetti; Federica Agosta; Elisa Canu; Silvia Basaia; Alessandra Barbieri; Rosalinda Cardamone; Maria Paola Bernasconi; Veronica Castelnovo; Camilla Cividini; Marco Cursi; Marco Vabanesi; Matteo Impellizzeri; Serena Marita Lazzarin; Giovanna Franca Fanelli; Fabio Minicucci; Giacomo Giacalone; Andrea Falini; Monica Falautano; Patrizia Rovere-Querini; Luisa Roveri; Massimo Filippi
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  The value of EEG attenuation in the prediction of outcome in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Lucio Marinelli; Irene Pappalardo; Chiara Robba; Laura Saitta; Corrado Cabona; Denise Battaglini; Monia Casaleggio; Anna Bellini; Alessandra Ferrari; Iole Brunetti; Flavio Villani
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 3.830

6.  Clinical Electroencephalography Findings and Considerations in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Neishay Ayub; Joseph Cohen; Jin Jing; Aayushee Jain; Ryan Tesh; Shibani S Mukerji; Sahar F Zafar; M Brandon Westover; Eyal Y Kimchi
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2020-12-03

7.  COVID-19, de novo seizures, and epilepsy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ali A Asadi-Pooya; Leila Simani; Mina Shahisavandi; Zohreh Barzegar
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.830

Review 8.  Differential Diagnosis and Hospital Emergency Management for Fastlane Treatment of Central Nervous System Infection Under the COVID-19 Epidemic in Changsha, China.

Authors:  Haojun Yang; Yunfang Chi; Zhuohui Chen; Yishu Fan; Haiyue Wu; Xinhang Hu; Tong Wu; Bo Xiao; Mengqi Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Retrospective Analysis of EEG in Patients With COVID-19: EEG Recording in Acute and Follow-up Phases.

Authors:  Isabel Sáez-Landete; Adriana Gómez-Domínguez; Beatriz Estrella-León; Alba Díaz-Cid; Olga Fedirchyk; Marta Escribano-Muñoz; Antonio Pedrera-Mazarro; Guillermo Martín-Palomeque; Guillermo Garcia-Ribas; Fernando Rodríguez-Jorge; Gloria Santos-Pérez; Daniel Lourido-García; Ignacio Regidor-BaillyBailliere
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 1.843

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.