| Literature DB >> 32556537 |
Imre Sándor Piross1,2, Manju Siliwal3, R Suresh Kumar4, Péter Palatitz5, Szabolcs Solt5, Péter Borbáth6, Nóra Vili7, Nóra Magonyi7,8, Zoltán Vas9, Lajos Rózsa10, Andrea Harnos1, Péter Fehérvári11.
Abstract
Sex-biassed and age-biassed parasite infections are common in nature, including ectoparasites-vertebrate host systems. We investigated the effect of Amur Falcons' sex, age and body size on the abundance of their lice at a migratory stopover site, where the falcons' habitat use and behaviour are more homogeneous across sex and age categories than during the breeding season. We sampled Amur Falcons in Nagaland, India at major roosting sites in 2016. We applied generalized linear models (with negative binomial distribution and log-link) to model the abundance of their two most numerous lice (Colpocephalum subzerafae and Degeeriella rufa) using the host age category (juvenile or adult) and wing length, both in interaction with sex, as explanatory variables. The abundance of C. subzerafae was only affected by host age, being nearly four times higher on juveniles than on adults. Juveniles were also more infested with D. rufa than the adults. Additionally, the abundance of the latter species was lower on adult male Falcons as compared to adult females. A juvenile bias in ectoparasite infestations is common in nature, probably due to juveniles being immunologically naïve, more resource-limited and may be inexperienced in body maintenance behaviours like preening and grooming. On the other hand, female-biassed infestations are much rarer than male-biassed infestations. We briefly discuss the possible causes of female-biassed infestations on Amur Falcons reported here, and in the closely related Red-footed Falcon and Lesser Kestrel as reported in the literature.Entities:
Keywords: Amblycera; Falconidae; Ischnocera; Louse; Phthiraptera; Sex-biassed infestation
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32556537 PMCID: PMC7366564 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-020-06753-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitol Res ISSN: 0932-0113 Impact factor: 2.289
Descriptive statistics of the louse infestation of the Amur Falcons (Falco amurensis) by age, louse species and sex (SD: standard deviation)
| Louse species | Age | Sex | Infected | Hosts | Prevalence | Mean abundance ± SD | Median abundance | Mean intensity ± SD | Median intensity | Variance/mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juveniles | Male | 15 | 20 | 75 | 6 ± 6.8 | 4 | 8.1 ± 6.7 | 4 | 7.5 | |
| Female | 10 | 11 | 91 | 8.9 ± 7.9 | 8 | 9.8 ± 7.7 | 8 | 7.0 | ||
| All | 25 | 31 | 81 | 7.1 ± 7.2 | 4 | 8.8 ± 7 | 7 | 7.3 | ||
| Adults | Male | 6 | 10 | 60 | 1.8 ± 2.1 | 1 | 3 ± 1.9 | 3 | 2.4 | |
| Female | 6 | 9 | 67 | 1.9 ± 1.7 | 2 | 2.8 ± 1.2 | 3 | 1.5 | ||
| All | 12 | 19 | 63 | 1.8 ± 1.9 | 1 | 2.9 ± 1.5 | 3 | 1.9 | ||
| Juveniles | Male | 20 | 20 | 100 | 9.4 ± 5.1 | 9 | 9.4 ± 5.1 | 9 | 2.8 | |
| Female | 11 | 11 | 100 | 10.4 ± 4.5 | 9 | 10.4 ± 4.5 | 9 | 1.9 | ||
| All | 31 | 31 | 100 | 9.7 ± 4.8 | 9 | 9.7 ± 4.8 | 9 | 2.4 | ||
| Adults | Male | 6 | 10 | 60 | 1.8 ± 2.5 | 1 | 3 ± 2.7 | 2 | 3.6 | |
| Female | 9 | 9 | 100 | 4.9 ± 4.8 | 3 | 4.9 ± 4.8 | 3 | 4.7 | ||
| All | 15 | 19 | 79 | 3.3 ± 4 | 2 | 4.1 ± 4.1 | 2 | 4.9 |
Abundances (and their 95% C.I.) of the different louse species on Amur Falcons (Falco amurensis) predicted by the GLMs
| Louse species | Age | Sex | Abundance estimate | 95% C.I. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juvenile | 7.1 | 4.8 | 10.4 | ||
| Adult | 1.8 | 1.0 | 3.3 | ||
| Juvenile | Male | 9.4 | 7.3 | 12.2 | |
| Female | 10.4 | 7.3 | 14.6 | ||
| Adult | Male | 1.8 | 1.0 | 3.1 | |
| Female | 4.9 | 3.2 | 7.6 | ||
Fig. 1Results of the GLMs modelling the mean abundance of the louse species on the Amur Falcons (Falco amurensis). The mean abundance of Colpocephalum subzerafae is higher on juveniles than on males. In the case of Degeeriella rufa, we found interaction between the sex and the age of the birds. The mean abundance of D. rufa is similarly high among juveniles for both sexes, while it is higher for adult females than adult males