Literature DB >> 32555488

Emergent constraint on Arctic Ocean acidification in the twenty-first century.

Jens Terhaar1,2,3, Lester Kwiatkowski4,5, Laurent Bopp4.   

Abstract

The ongoing uptake of anthropogenic carbon by the ocean leads to ocean acidification, a process that results in a reduction in pH and in the saturation state of biogenic calcium carbonate minerals aragonite (Ωarag) and calcite (Ωcalc)1,2. Because of its naturally low Ωarag and Ωcalc (refs. 2,3), the Arctic Ocean is considered the region most susceptible to future acidification and associated ecosystem impacts4-7. However, the magnitude of projected twenty-first century acidification differs strongly across Earth system models8. Here we identify an emergent multi-model relationship between the simulated present-day density of Arctic Ocean surface waters, used as a proxy for Arctic deep-water formation, and projections of the anthropogenic carbon inventory and coincident acidification. By applying observations of sea surface density, we constrain the end of twenty-first century Arctic Ocean anthropogenic carbon inventory to 9.0 ± 1.6 petagrams of carbon and the basin-averaged Ωarag and Ωcalc to 0.76 ± 0.06 and 1.19 ± 0.09, respectively, under the high-emissions Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 climate scenario. Our results indicate greater regional anthropogenic carbon storage and ocean acidification than previously projected3,8 and increase the probability that large parts of the mesopelagic Arctic Ocean will be undersaturated with respect to calcite by the end of the century. This increased rate of Arctic Ocean acidification, combined with rapidly changing physical and biogeochemical Arctic conditions9-11, is likely to exacerbate the impact of climate change on vulnerable Arctic marine ecosystems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32555488     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2360-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  6 in total

1.  The changing Arctic Ocean: consequences for biological communities, biogeochemical processes and ecosystem functioning.

Authors:  Martin Solan; Philippe Archambault; Paul E Renaud; Christian März
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Southern Ocean anthropogenic carbon sink constrained by sea surface salinity.

Authors:  Jens Terhaar; Thomas L Frölicher; Fortunat Joos
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 14.136

3.  Evolving the narrative for protecting a rapidly changing ocean, post-COVID-19.

Authors:  D Laffoley; J M Baxter; D J Amon; J Claudet; J M Hall-Spencer; K Grorud-Colvert; L A Levin; P C Reid; A D Rogers; M L Taylor; L C Woodall; N F Andersen
Journal:  Aquat Conserv       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 4.  The role of a changing Arctic Ocean and climate for the biogeochemical cycling of dimethyl sulphide and carbon monoxide.

Authors:  Hanna I Campen; Damian L Arévalo-Martínez; Yuri Artioli; Ian J Brown; Vassilis Kitidis; Gennadi Lessin; Andrew P Rees; Hermann W Bange
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Stratification constrains future heat and carbon uptake in the Southern Ocean between 30°S and 55°S.

Authors:  Timothée Bourgeois; Nadine Goris; Jörg Schwinger; Jerry F Tjiputra
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Constrained CMIP6 projections indicate less warming and a slower increase in water availability across Asia.

Authors:  Yuanfang Chai; Yao Yue; Louise J Slater; Jiabo Yin; Alistair G L Borthwick; Tiexi Chen; Guojie Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 17.694

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.