Literature DB >> 32555416

Training the next generation of genomic medicine providers: trends in medical education and national assessment.

Shoumita Dasgupta1, Gerald L Feldman2, Cynthia M Powell3, Helga V Toriello4, Judith Westman5, William G Wilson6, Darrel J Waggoner7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the utilization of genetics on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE®).
METHODS: A team of clinical genetics educators performed an analysis of the representation of genetics content on a robust sample of recent Step 1, Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK), and Step 3 examination forms. The content of each question was mapped to curriculum recommendations from the peer reviewed Association of Professors of Human and Medical Genetics white paper, Medical School Core Curriculum in Genetics, and the USMLE Content Outline.
RESULTS: The committee identified 13.4%, 10.4%, and 4.4% of Steps 1, 2 and 3 respectively, as having genetics content. The genetics content of the exams became less pertinent to the questions from Step 1 to 3, with decreasing genetics content by exam and increasing percentages of questions identified as having genetics content in the distractors only.
CONCLUSION: The current distribution of genetics in USMLE licensing examinations reflects traditional curricular approaches with genetics as a basic science course in the early years of medical school and de-emphasizes clinical relevance of the field. These observations support the notion that further integration is required to move genetics into the clinical curriculum of medical schools and the clinical content of USMLE Step exams.

Entities:  

Keywords:  United States Medical Licensing Examination; clinical genetics; medical genetics; medical genetics curriculum; undergraduate medical education

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32555416     DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0855-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  2 in total

1.  Correspondence on "Ensuring best practice in genomics education and evaluation: Reporting item standards for education and its evaluation in genomics (RISE2 Genomics)" by Nisselle et al.

Authors:  Andrew A Dwyer; Kathleen A Calzone; Sarah Dewell; Laurie Badzek; Christine Patch
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 8.864

2.  Education and Training of Non-Genetics Providers on the Return of Genome Sequencing Results in a NICU Setting.

Authors:  Kelly M East; Meagan E Cochran; Whitley V Kelley; Veronica Greve; Candice R Finnila; Tanner Coleman; Mikayla Jennings; Latonya Alexander; Elizabeth J Rahn; Maria I Danila; Greg Barsh; Bruce Korf; Greg Cooper
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.