| Literature DB >> 32555368 |
Emilia J Kozyra1,2, Victor B Pastor1, Stylianos Lefkopoulos2,3, Sushree S Sahoo1,4, Hauke Busch5,6,7, Rebecca K Voss1, Miriam Erlacher1,8,9, Dirk Lebrecht1, Enikoe A Szvetnik1, Shinsuke Hirabayashi1,10, Ramunė Pasaulienė11, Lucia Pedace12, Marco Tartaglia13, Christian Klemann14, Patrick Metzger2,15, Melanie Boerries8,9,15, Albert Catala16, Henrik Hasle17, Valerie de Haas18, Krisztián Kállay19, Riccardo Masetti20, Barbara De Moerloose21, Michael Dworzak22, Markus Schmugge23, Owen Smith24, Jan Starý25, Ester Mejstrikova25, Marek Ussowicz26, Emma Morris27,28,29, Preeti Singh30,31, Matthew Collin30,31, Marta Derecka3, Gudrun Göhring32, Christian Flotho1,8,9, Brigitte Strahm1, Franco Locatelli12,33, Charlotte M Niemeyer1,8,9, Eirini Trompouki3,34, Marcin W Wlodarski35,36.
Abstract
Deficiency of the transcription factor GATA2 is a highly penetrant genetic disorder predisposing to myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and immunodeficiency. It has been recognized as the most common cause underlying primary MDS in children. Triggered by the discovery of a recurrent synonymous GATA2 variant, we systematically investigated 911 patients with phenotype of pediatric MDS or cellular deficiencies for the presence of synonymous alterations in GATA2. In total, we identified nine individuals with five heterozygous synonymous mutations: c.351C>G, p.T117T (N = 4); c.649C>T, p.L217L; c.981G>A, p.G327G; c.1023C>T, p.A341A; and c.1416G>A, p.P472P (N = 2). They accounted for 8.2% (9/110) of cases with GATA2 deficiency in our cohort and resulted in selective loss of mutant RNA. While for the hotspot mutation (c.351C>G) a splicing error leading to RNA and protein reduction was identified, severe, likely late stage RNA loss without splicing disruption was found for other mutations. Finally, the synonymous mutations did not alter protein function or stability. In summary, synonymous GATA2 substitutions are a new common cause of GATA2 deficiency. These findings have broad implications for genetic counseling and pathogenic variant discovery in Mendelian disorders.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32555368 PMCID: PMC7515837 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-0899-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leukemia ISSN: 0887-6924 Impact factor: 11.528
Fig. 1Composition and genetics of the study cohort.
a Flow diagram depicts the screening cohort and GATA2 mutations identified. b Overall distribution of genotypes among 110 patients with GATA2 deficiency. Truncating variants are localized prior to or within zinc finger 2; missense mutations cluster mainly to zinc finger 2 region; intron 4 mutations affect the EBOX-GATA-ETS regulatory region (+9.5 kb) of GATA2; other: one in-frame deletion and two whole gene deletions; synonymous variants are proposed as a new group of pathogenic GATA2 mutations. Numbers in parentheses refer to individual patients. c Frequency of patients with synonymous mutations among all GATA2 positive cases and among the group of patients carrying exonic substitutions. d Schematic representation of the GATA2 gene (NM_032638.4) with synonymous variants identified. Affected nucleotide is shaded blue and dashed line boxes indicate respective codon triplet. Nucleotide conservation is presented for nine species. Evolutionary conservation is depicted on the bottom as Genomic Evolutionary Rate Profiling (GERP + + RS) score with values ranging from −12.36 to 6.18, and 6.18 being the most conserved. Splicing prediction was performed with Human Splicing Finder v.3.0. ESS exonic splicing silencer, ESE exonic splicing enhancer.
Synonymous variants identified in MDS patients.
| Patient no. (ID) | Genomic DNA VAF% (total depth) | cDNA VAF% WT/Mut (total depth) | Evol conser/ PhysChem diff | CADD/GAVIN (C2; | gnomAD browser MAF% (mutant/total) | Splicing prediction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 (D 1239) | c.351C>G; p.T117T | WES50% (160), DS47% (766) | DS99.88%/0.006% (320215) | Medium/none | 10.5/B | None | Cryptic donor, new ESS site |
| P2 (sister of P1) | c.351C>G; p.T117T | Heterozygous (Sanger) | Not done | As above | As above | As above | As above |
| P3 (D 749) | c.351C>G; p.T117T | WES47% (130), DS51% (703) | DS99.89%/0.004% (838094) | As above | As above | As above | As above |
| P4 (LT) | c.649C>T; p.L217L | WES48% (196), DS51% (725) | DS79.43%/20.56% (429616) | High/none | 10.7/B | 0.001% (2/246096) | None |
| P5 (D 722) | c.981G>A; p.G327G | WES52% (156), DS48% (788) | DS99.96%/0.014% (7190) | Medium/none | 18.5/B | None | New ESS site |
| P6 (D 1142) | c.1023C>T; p.A341A | WES47% (296), DS49% (1449) | DS99.91%/0.095% (4213) | Weak/none | 15.4/B | 0.002% (6/275438) | ESE site broken |
| P7 (D) | c.1416G>A; p.P472P | WES49% (63) | DS99.91%/0.085% (388784) | Medium/none | 12.4/B | 0.027% (70/256322) | None |
| P8 (I 386) | c.1416G>A; p.P472P | Heterozygous (Sanger) | Not done | As above | As above | As above | As above |
| P9 (UKA2604) | c.351C>G; p.T117T | Heterozygous (Sanger) | Not done | Medium/none | 10.5/B | None | Cryptic donor, new ESS site |
Gene annotation: GATA2 (NM_032638.4).
VAF variant allelic frequency, WT wild-type allele, Mut mutated allele, WES whole exome sequencing, DS deep sequencing, Sanger identified by Sanger sequencing, Evol (evolutionary) conservation assessed using Phylop and PhastCons, PhysChem diff physicochemical difference between amino acids, CADD combined annotation-dependent depletion score, GAVIN Gene-Aware Variant Interpretation (C2: CADD scores significantly predictive for pathogenicity (p < 0.05), P pathogenic if CADD > 26, B benign if CADD lower than 19), MAF minor allelic frequency, Splicing prediction Human Splicing Finder v. 3.0. ESS exonic splicing silencer, ESE exonic splicing enhancer.
Clinical characteristics of patients with synonymous GATA2 mutations.
| Patient no. (ID) | Age at Dx | Sex | Hematological presentation and other features | Karyotype | Therapies | Age and status at last FUP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 (D 1239) | 12 | F | RCC, low IgG, low monocytes/B/DC | −7 | MUD-HSCT | 13.5 years: alive |
| P2 (sister of P1) | 11 | F | B/NK-cell lymphopenia, low IgA/G | Not done | Observation | 12 years: alive |
| P3 (D 749) | 14 | F | MDS-EB | −7 | CB-HSCT | 15.4 years: died from infection 7 months after HSCT |
| P4 (LT) | 3 | M | RCC, facial abnormalities, skin hypopigmentation, joint hypermobility | −7 | MSD-HSCT | 7.6 years: alive |
| P5 (D 722) | 11 | M | RCC, hepatosplenomegaly | Normal | Observation | 18.5 years: alive |
| P6 (D 1142) | 11.5 | M | RCC, hypospadias | −7 | MUD-HSCT | 15.2 years: alive |
| P7 (D) | 14 | F | Suspicious for RCC | Normal | – | 20.9 years: alive |
| P8 (I 386) | 4 | F | RCC | Normal | MUD-HSCT | 4 years: alive |
| P9 (UKA2604) | 24 | F | MDS-MLD, low monocytes/B/NK/DC, recurrent viral warts, mycobacterium avium infections, HPV-driven neoplasia, Crohn’s colitis | Normal | MUD-HSCT | 32 years: alive |
Dx diagnosis, RCC refractory cytopenia of childhood, DC dendritic cells, NK natural killer cells, MDS-EB myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blast, MDS-MLD myelodysplastic syndrome with multilineage dysplasia, HSCT allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, −7 monosomy 7, MUD matched unrelated donor, CB cord blood, MSD matched sibling donor, FUP follow-up.
Fig. 2Sequencing analysis of patients with synonymous GATA2 mutations.
a Upper panel: Representative electropherograms with genomic and cDNA sequence surrounding the affected nucleotide (red line). All five distinct synonymous mutations are represented. Lower panel: Comparison of allelic expression in the hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic tissue of P1 and P4. b Genetic testing of healthy controls carrying a common nonsynonymous GATA2 polymorphism c.490G>A (19.5% minor allele frequency in gnomAD). c Allelic frequency of GATA2 alleles determined by targeted deep sequencing of patients’ cDNA; numbers of reads taken from one representative replicate. In all cases oligo(dT) priming was used with exception of P4 and P5 (*) where the mixture of random hexamers and oligo(dT) was utilized. Outside right: Boxplot depicts combined allelic contribution in all patients. Calculation of p value was performed using Student’s t test (mean ± SD values). d Frequency of mutated alleles determined by deep sequencing of cDNA obtained from bone marrow RNA using two different reverse transcription priming methods. Mutant vs. total read counts are shown in parentheses, and percentage represents the proportion of mutated alleles in the sample. BM bone marrow, Fib fibroblasts, PB peripheral blood.
Fig. 3Alternative splicing.
a Sashimi plot of GATA2 exon 3 of P1 depicting two novel splicing events (represented by arcs) detected by RNAseq; dashed lines indicate the positions of an alternative donor and two new acceptors. b Long range RT-PCR spanning exon 2–5 of GATA2 transcript revealed the presence of an additional shorter product of 860 bp in P1 (indicated by asterisk (*)) corresponding to one of the transcripts found by RNAseq (donor: c.351—acceptor: c.488). Only wild-type allele (996 bp) was detected in P3–P6. c Frequency and schematic representation of novel splicing patterns in P1 detected by TA cloning of the RT-PCR product. It confirmed the presence of three novel transcripts, of which two were also identified by RNAseq. BM bone marrow, Fib fibroblasts, PB peripheral blood. GATA2 (NM_032638.4).
Fig. 4Assessment of protein expression and function.
a Expression of endogenous GATA2 protein in platelets of P9 (c.351C>G, p.T117T). Left: Representative western blot image for the expression level of GATA2 and ß-actin. Right: Relative optical density of GATA2 protein normalized with ß-actin. GATA2 deficiency group comprises four pathogenic mutations in GATA2 coding region. b Transactivation activity measured by GATA reporter assay. Previously reported p.L359V mutant was used as a positive control. Fold activation of luciferase reporter was determined from the triplicate values from three independent experiments and presented as the mean ± SD values. Comparison between the GATA2 WT and each synonymous Mut, as well as p value calculation was performed using a standard one-way ANOVA test. c The electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) depicting DNA-binding ability of GATA2 p.L217L, compared with WT and a known loss-of-function mutation p.R396Q, lanes spliced from the same gel runs (experiment repeated three times). Shift: semiquantitative comparison of GATA2 binding strength to the target oligo (biotin-labeled probe containing wild-type target sequence); Super Shift: specificity of FLAG-GATA2 binding to DNA sequence with anti-FLAG antibody (Ab); Competition: includes 10× and 100× excess of unlabeled wild-type probe competing for binding of the protein; Specificity: contains biotin-labeled probe with mutated target sequence which cannot be bound by the analyzed protein. Three latter setups verify that the signal obtained in the shift reaction is the result of specific DNA-protein interaction. d Assessment of translation efficiency (left) and protein stability (right) of GATA2 synonymous mutants in transiently transfected 293T cells treated with 1 µg/ml actinomycin D and 10 µg/ml cycloheximide, respectively. Experiments were performed in duplicates. Blots from representative experiments are shown.
Fig. 5In vivo analysis of zebrafish hematopoiesis.
a Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) performed at 28 h post fertilization (hpf) for c-myb in embryos injected with control or gata2b morpholino (MO). The arrows indicate the location of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) in the zebrafish aorta. The numbers in each picture indicate the number of embryos with depicted phenotype out of all embryos analyzed. b Rescue experiment performed on embryos co-injected with gata2b MO and human GATA2 WT or Mut (c.649C>T) mRNA. Transposase (TP) mRNA was used as a random control RNA with no expected impact. A substantial number of the Mut (c.649C>T) mRNA-injected morphants show an even stronger (high) staining than control TP mRNA-injected siblings. c Graphical representation of the rescue experiment. Distribution of phenotypes in all tested animals: high, indicates a stronger staining to the one of noninjected and standard control MO-injected embryos; medium, indicates a staining equivalent or approximately equivalent to the staining of noninjected and standard control MO-injected embryos; low, indicates a weaker staining compared with the staining of noninjected and standard control MO-injected embryos (deficiency of HSPCs). d Left panel: Graphical representation of percentage of embryos with medium or high staining for each treatment category. Right panel: Percentage of morphant embryos depicting high staining when injected with either WT or Mut (c.649C>T) mRNA. Each experiment was performed in triplicates (N = 3; mean ± SD, Student’s t test, *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001).