| Literature DB >> 32554941 |
Ayumi Mukunoki1, Toru Takeo1, Satohiro Nakao1, Kana Tamura1, Yuka Horikoshi1, Naomi Nakagata2.
Abstract
The cold storage of two-cell embryos is a useful technique for transporting genetically engineered mice without the shipment of live animals. However, the developmental ability of cold-stored embryos decreases with prolonged storage periods. Therefore, the transported embryos must be readily transferred to recipient mice upon arrival. The cryopreservation of cold-transported embryos may improve the flexibility of the schedule of embryo transfer. In this paper, we examined the viability and developmental ability of vitrified-warmed mouse embryos at the two-cell stage after cold storage in refrigerated temperatures for 0, 24, 48, 72, or 96 h. The viability of vitrified-warmed embryos after cold storage was comparable to vitrified-warmed embryos without cold storage. Vitrified-warmed embryos after cold storage also developed normally to pups by embryo transfer. In addition, live pups were obtained from vitrified-warmed embryos after cold-transportation from Asahikawa Medical University. In summary, cold-stored embryos can be used for the transportation and archive of genetically engineered mice.Entities:
Keywords: cold storage; cryopreservation; embryo transfer; mouse; two-cell embryos
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32554941 PMCID: PMC7677088 DOI: 10.1538/expanim.20-0042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Anim ISSN: 0007-5124
Fig. 1.Transport experiment of two-cell embryos from Asahikawa to Kumamoto. Two-cell embryos were transported from Asahikawa Medical University to CARD, Kumamoto University. Location of both institutions is depicted on a map of Japan.
Fig. 2.The survival rate of vitrified-warmed embryos after cold storage. The embryos were stored for 0, 24, 48, 72, or 96 h before vitrification. The survival rate was calculated as follows: (Number of morphologically normal embryos/Number of collected embryos) × 100. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n=4–5). More than 39 embryos were analyzed in each experiment, and the total number of analyzed embryos in each experimental group was as follows (0 h: 227, 24 h: 170, 48 h: 172, 72 h: 226, and 96 h: 227).
Fig. 3.The developmental ability of vitrified-warmed embryos after cold storage. The embryos stored in the refrigerator for 0, 24, 48, 72, or 96 h (A: 0 h, B: 24 h, C: 48 h, D: 72 h, E: 96 h) and then vitrified. The developmental rate was calculated as follows: (Number of four-cell embryos, morulae, or blastocysts/Number of two-cell embryos) × 100. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n=4–15). *P<0.05 compared with Cold-stored embryos. More than 27 embryos were analyzed in each experiment, and the total number of analyzed embryos in each experimental group was as follows (0 h-Cold: 457, 0 h-Vitrified-Cold: 328, 0h-Cold-Vitrified: 197, 24 h-Cold: 397, 24 h-Vitrified-Cold: 236, 24 h: Cold-Vitrified: 166, 48 h-Cold: 426, 48 h-Vitrified-Cold: 324, 48 h-Cold-Vitrified: 167, 72 h-Cold: 397, 72 h-Vitrified-Cold: 257, 72 h-Cold-Vitrified: 205, 96 h-Cold: 456, 96 h-Vitrified-Cold: 227, and 96 h-Cold-Vitrified: 208).
Developmental ability of cold-vitrified embryos by embryo transfer
| Stored period (h) | Two-cell embryos | Number of recipients | Number oftransferred embryos | Number of live pups (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72 | Cold | 4 | 80 | 35 (43.8 ± 4.8) |
| Vitrified-Cold | 4 | 80 | 34 (42.5 ± 22.2) | |
| Cold-Vitrified | 3 | 60 | 27 (45.0 ± 10.0) | |
| 96 | Cold | 7 | 140 | 36 (25.7 ± 9.8) |
| Vitrified-Cold | 4 | 80 | 25 (31.3 ± 16.5) | |
| Cold-Vitrified | 4 | 78 | 17 (21.8 ± 6.2) |
Two-cell embryos were transferred to each oviduct of the recipient mice (18–20 embryos/recipient), and the number of pups was recorded after 19 days. The birth rate was calculated as follows: (Number of pups/Number of transferred two-cell embryos) × 100. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n=3–7).
Preparation of transported 2-cell embryos for embryo transfer
| Two-cell embryos | Number of cold stored 2-cell embryos | Number of survival 2-cell embryos (%) | Number ofcryopreserved 2-cell embryos | Number of retrieved 2-cell embryos (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold | 80 | 80 (100) | - | - |
| Vitrified-Cold | 117 | 112 (95.7 ± 5.5) | - | - |
| Cold-Vitrified | 81 | 81 (100) | 81 | 79 (97.5 ± 3.4) |
Two-cell embryos were transported from Asahikawa Medical University to CARD, Kumamoto University. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n=2–4).
Developmental ability of cold-vitrified embryos transported from Asahikawa Medical University
| Two-cell embryos | Number of recipients | Number oftransferred embryos | Number of live pups (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cold | 4 | 80 | 38 (47.5 ± 13.2) |
| Vitrified-Cold | 6 | 112 | 28 (25.0 ± 18.2) |
| Cold-Vitrified | 4 | 79 | 24 (30.4 ± 12.9) |
Two-cell embryos were transferred to each oviduct of the recipient mice (17–20 embryos/recipient), and the number of pups was recorded after 19 days. Two-cell embryos stored in refrigerated temperatures for 3 days were used as controls (Cold). The birth rate was calculated as follows: (Number of pups/Number of transferred two-cell embryos) × 100. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n=4–6).
Fig. 4.Transport and cryopreservation of cold-stored mouse embryos. At the sending facility, two-cell embryos were prepared from cryopreserved samples or produced by in vitro fertilization (IVF). The embryos were transported at refrigerated temperatures. At the receiving facility, the embryos were transferred to recipient mice or cryopreserved in a liquid nitrogen tank before use.