Literature DB >> 32554620

International trends in oesophageal cancer survival by histological subtype between 1995 and 2014.

Eileen Morgan1,2, Isabelle Soerjomataram3, Anna T Gavin2, Mark J Rutherford4, Piers Gatenby5, Aude Bardot3, Jacques Ferlay3, Oliver Bucher6, Prithwish De7, Gerda Engholm8, Christopher Jackson9,10, Serena Kozie11, Alana Little12, Bjorn Møller13, Lorraine Shack14, Hanna Tervonen12, Vicky Thursfield15, Sally Vernon16, Paul M Walsh17, Ryan R Woods18, Christian Finley19, Neil Merrett20, Dianne L O'Connell21, John V Reynolds22, Freddie Bray3, Melina Arnold3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Survival from oesophageal cancer remains poor, even across high-income countries. Ongoing changes in the epidemiology of the disease highlight the need for survival assessments by its two main histological subtypes, adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).
METHODS: The ICBP SURVMARK-2 project, a platform for international comparisons of cancer survival, collected cases of oesophageal cancer diagnosed 1995 to 2014, followed until 31st December 2015, from cancer registries covering seven participating countries with similar access to healthcare (Australia, Canada, Denmark, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway and the UK). 1-year and 3-year age-standardised net survival alongside incidence rates were calculated by country, subtype, sex, age group and period of diagnosis.
RESULTS: 111 894 cases of AC and 73 408 cases of SCC were included in the analysis. Marked improvements in survival were observed over the 20-year period in each country, particularly for AC, younger age groups and 1 year after diagnosis. Survival was consistently higher for both subtypes in Australia and Ireland followed by Norway, Denmark, New Zealand, the UK and Canada. During 2010 to 2014, survival was higher for AC compared with SCC, with 1-year survival ranging from 46.9% (Canada) to 54.4% (Ireland) for AC and 39.6% (Denmark) to 53.1% (Australia) for SCC.
CONCLUSION: Marked improvements in both oesophageal AC and SCC survival suggest advances in treatment. Less marked improvements 3 years after diagnosis, among older age groups and patients with SCC, highlight the need for further advances in early detection and treatment of oesophageal cancer alongside primary prevention to reduce the overall burden from the disease. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer epidemiology; cancer registries; histopathology; oesophageal cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 32554620     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  15 in total

1.  FLOT and CROSS chemotherapy regimens alter the frequency of CD27+ and CD69+ T cells in oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas: implications for combination with immunotherapy.

Authors:  Maria Davern; Noel E Donlon; Andrew S Sheppard; Klaudia D Majcher; Fiona O' Connell; Aisling B Heeran; Malika Grant; Robert A Farrell; Conall Hayes; Dara Bracken-Clarke; Melissa J Conroy; Emma Foley; Dermot O' Toole; Anshul Bhardwaj; Narayanasamy Ravi; John V Reynolds; Stephen G Maher; Jacintha O' Sullivan; Joanne Lysaght
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 4.322

2.  Statins and the risk of gastric, colorectal, and esophageal cancer incidence and mortality: a cohort study based on data from the Korean national health insurance claims database.

Authors:  Dong-Sook Kim; Hyun Jung Kim; Hyeong Sik Ahn
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.322

Review 3.  Radiomic assessment of oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a critical review of 18F-FDG PET/CT, PET/MRI and CT.

Authors:  Robert J O'Shea; Chris Rookyard; Sam Withey; Gary J R Cook; Sophia Tsoka; Vicky Goh
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 4.  The tumour immune microenvironment in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Maria Davern; Noel E Donlon; Margaret R Dunne; Robert Power; Conall Hayes; Ross King; John V Reynolds
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Evolutionary dynamics in Barrett oesophagus: implications for surveillance, risk stratification and therapy.

Authors:  Melissa Schmidt; Richard J Hackett; Ann-Marie Baker; Stuart A C McDonald; Michael Quante; Trevor A Graham
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  circFAM120B functions as a tumor suppressor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via the miR-661/PPM1L axis and the PKR/p38 MAPK/EMT pathway.

Authors:  Huan Song; Dan Tian; Jian Sun; Xuhua Mao; Weimin Kong; Dian Xu; Ye Ji; Beibei Qiu; Mengyao Zhan; Jianming Wang
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 9.685

7.  Exercise-based dysphagia rehabilitation for adults with oesophageal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Gillman; Michelle Hayes; Greg Sheaf; Margaret Walshe; John V Reynolds; Julie Regan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  ESCCAL-1 promotes cell-cycle progression by interacting with and stabilizing galectin-1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuanbo Cui; Ming Yan; Wei Wu; Pengju Lv; Jinwu Wang; Yanping Huo; Yanan Lou; Xiwen Ma; Jing Chang; Fangxia Guan; Wei Cao
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 9.  Advances in the curative management of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jarlath C Bolger; Claire L Donohoe; Maeve Lowery; John V Reynolds
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A DNA-damage immune response assay combined with PET biomarkers predicts response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kieran G Foley; Anita Lavery; Eoin Napier; David Campbell; Martin M Eatock; Richard D Kennedy; Kevin M Bradley; Richard C Turkington
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.