Literature DB >> 32554602

Clinical Characteristics and Exploratory Genomic Analyses of Germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations in Breast Cancer.

Sehhoon Park1, Eunjin Lee2, Seri Park3, Sohee Lee3, Seok Jin Nam4, Seok Won Kim4, Jeong Eon Lee4, Jong-Han Yu4, Ji-Yeon Kim1, Jin Seok Ahn1, Young-Hyuck Im1, Woong-Yang Park2, Kyunghee Park5, Yeon Hee Park6,3.   

Abstract

gBRCA1/2 mutations increase the incidence of breast cancer by interrupting the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. Although gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 breast cancer have similar clinical profiles, different molecular characteristics have been observed. In this study, we conducted comprehensive genomic analyses and compared gBRCA1/2 breast cancer. Sanger sequencing to identify gBRCA1/2 mutations was conducted in 2,720 patients, and gBRCA1 (n = 128) and gBRCA2 (n = 126) mutations were analyzed. Within this population, deep target sequencing and matched whole-transcriptome sequencing (WTS) results were available for 46 and 34 patients, respectively. An internal database of patients with breast cancer with wild-type gBRCA was used to compile a target sequencing (n = 195) and WTS (n = 137) reference dataset. Three specific mutation sites, p.Y130X (n = 14) and p.1210Afs (n = 13) in gBRCA1 and p.R294X (n = 22) in gBRCA2, were comparably frequent. IHC subtyping determined that the incidence of triple-negative breast cancer was higher among those with a gBRCA1 mutation (71.9%), and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer was dominant in those with a gBRCA2 mutation (76.2%). gBRCA1/2 mutations were mutually exclusive with PIK3CA somatic mutations (P < 0.05), and gBRCA1 frequently cooccurred with TP53 somatic mutations (P < 0.05). The median tumor mutation burden was 6.53 per megabase (MB) in gBRCA1 and 6.44 per MB in gBRCA2. The expression of AR, ESR1, and PGR was significantly upregulated with gBRCA2 mutation compared with gBRCA1 mutation. gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 breast cancer have similar clinical characteristics, but they have different molecular subtypes, coaltered somatic mutations, and gene expression patterns. IMPLICATIONS: Even though gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 mutations both alter HRR pathways, our results suggest that they generate different molecular characteristics and different mechanisms of carcinogenesis. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32554602     DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-19-1108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Res        ISSN: 1541-7786            Impact factor:   5.852


  2 in total

1.  Flimma: a federated and privacy-aware tool for differential gene expression analysis.

Authors:  Olga Zolotareva; Reza Nasirigerdeh; Julian Matschinske; Reihaneh Torkzadehmahani; Mohammad Bakhtiari; Tobias Frisch; Julian Späth; David B Blumenthal; Amir Abbasinejad; Paolo Tieri; Georgios Kaissis; Daniel Rückert; Nina K Wenke; Markus List; Jan Baumbach
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 13.583

2.  The impact of race and ethnicity in breast cancer-disparities and implications for precision oncology.

Authors:  Kelly A Hirko; Gabrielle Rocque; Erica Reasor; Ammanuel Taye; Alex Daly; Ramsey I Cutress; Ellen R Copson; Dae-Won Lee; Kyung-Hun Lee; Seock-Ah Im; Yeon Hee Park
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 8.775

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.