| Literature DB >> 32553196 |
Lisenka E L M Vissers1, Sreehari Kalvakuri2, Elke de Boer3, Sinje Geuer3, Machteld Oud3, Inge van Outersterp3, Michael Kwint3, Melde Witmond3, Simone Kersten4, Daniel L Polla5, Dilys Weijers3, Amber Begtrup6, Kirsty McWalter6, Anna Ruiz7, Elisabeth Gabau7, Jenny E V Morton8, Christopher Griffith9, Karin Weiss10, Candace Gamble11, James Bartley12, Hilary J Vernon13, Kendra Brunet14, Claudia Ruivenkamp15, Sarina G Kant15, Paul Kruszka16, Austin Larson17, Alexandra Afenjar18, Thierry Billette de Villemeur19, Kimberly Nugent19, F Lucy Raymond20, Hanka Venselaar21, Florence Demurger22, Claudia Soler-Alfonso23, Dong Li24, Elizabeth Bhoj24, Ian Hayes25, Nina Powell Hamilton26, Ayesha Ahmad26, Rachel Fisher26, Myrthe van den Born27, Marjolaine Willems28, Arthur Sorlin29, Julian Delanne29, Sebastien Moutton30, Philippe Christophe31, Frederic Tran Mau-Them31, Antonio Vitobello31, Himanshu Goel32, Lauren Massingham33, Chanika Phornphutkul33, Jennifer Schwab33, Boris Keren34, Perrine Charles34, Maaike Vreeburg35, Lenika De Simone36, George Hoganson36, Maria Iascone37, Donatella Milani38, Lucie Evenepoel39, Nicole Revencu39, D Isum Ward40, Kaitlyn Burns40, Ian Krantz41, Sarah E Raible41, Jill R Murrell41, Kathleen Wood41, Megan T Cho6, Hans van Bokhoven3, Maximilian Muenke10, Tjitske Kleefstra3, Rolf Bodmer42, Arjan P M de Brouwer3.
Abstract
CNOT1 is a member of the CCR4-NOT complex, which is a master regulator, orchestrating gene expression, RNA deadenylation, and protein ubiquitination. We report on 39 individuals with heterozygous de novo CNOT1 variants, including missense, splice site, and nonsense variants, who present with a clinical spectrum of intellectual disability, motor delay, speech delay, seizures, hypotonia, and behavioral problems. To link CNOT1 dysfunction to the neurodevelopmental phenotype observed, we generated variant-specific Drosophila models, which showed learning and memory defects upon CNOT1 knockdown. Introduction of human wild-type CNOT1 was able to rescue this phenotype, whereas mutants could not or only partially, supporting our hypothesis that CNOT1 impairment results in neurodevelopmental delay. Furthermore, the genetic interaction with autism-spectrum genes, such as ASH1L, DYRK1A, MED13, and SHANK3, was impaired in our Drosophila models. Molecular characterization of CNOT1 variants revealed normal CNOT1 expression levels, with both mutant and wild-type alleles expressed at similar levels. Analysis of protein-protein interactions with other members indicated that the CCR4-NOT complex remained intact. An integrated omics approach of patient-derived genomics and transcriptomics data suggested only minimal effects on endonucleolytic nonsense-mediated mRNA decay components, suggesting that de novo CNOT1 variants are likely haploinsufficient hypomorph or neomorph, rather than dominant negative. In summary, we provide strong evidence that de novo CNOT1 variants cause neurodevelopmental delay with a wide range of additional co-morbidities. Whereas the underlying pathophysiological mechanism warrants further analysis, our data demonstrate an essential and central role of the CCR4-NOT complex in human brain development.Entities:
Keywords: CCR4-NOT complex; CNOT1; Drosophila; de novo mutations; developmental delay; exome sequencing; genomics; intellectual disability; neurodevelopment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32553196 PMCID: PMC7332645 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.05.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Hum Genet ISSN: 0002-9297 Impact factor: 11.025