Literature DB >> 32553052

Genomic sequence analysis of Dissulfurirhabdus thermomarina SH388 and proposed reassignment to Dissulfurirhabdaceae fam. nov.

Lewis M Ward1,2, Emma Bertran3,2, David T Johnston2.   

Abstract

Here, we report the draft genome sequence of Dissulfurirhabdus thermomarina SH388. Improved phylogenetic and taxonomic analysis of this organism using genome-level analyses supports assignment of this organism to a novel family within the phylum Desulfobacterota. Additionally, comparative genomic and phylogenetic analyses contextualize the convergent evolution of sulfur disproportionation and potential extracellular electron transfer in this organism relative to other members of the Desulfobacterota.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deltaproteobacteria; EET; comparative genomics; sulfate reduction

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32553052      PMCID: PMC7478628          DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Genom        ISSN: 2057-5858


Data Summary

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information repository under BioProject number PRJNA579145. Raw sequencing data is available in the SRA database under accession number SRR11035951, while the assembled genome is available in the WGS database under accession number JAAGRR000000000. Our understanding of Earth history is largely based on analysis of the rock record, but the preservation of chemical signals in rocks is modulated by the interaction of sediments with microbial metabolisms, many of which are poorly understood. The ways in which microbes are able to breathe insoluble compounds such as elemental sulfur is of particular interest. is a bacterium in the phylum Desulfobacterota, and is notable for its ability to perform extracellular electron transfer to respire insoluble compounds, as well as its ability to disproportionate elemental sulfur – essentially making a living by fermenting sulfur into sulfide and sulfate in a manner analogous to brewer’s yeast fermenting sugar into alcohol and carbon dioxide. Here, we report the genome of and show that it evolved its metabolic traits independently from other groups of bacteria capable of similar processes. This has relevance for understanding the biochemical mechanisms, diversity and evolution of both extracellular electron transfer and sulfur disproportionation, enigmatic metabolisms that are important for shaping the preservation of chemical signals in the rock record.

Introduction

The disproportionation of intermediate valence sulfur species (converting substrates such as sulfite, thiosulfate and elemental sulfur into products of sulfate and sulfide) is a poorly understood microbial metabolism that has been implicated in the production and preservation of extremely depleted sulfur isotope signatures in the rock record [1, 2]. Despite its potential significance for understanding paleo-redox proxies [3], this metabolism is not well elucidated [4] and the genetic capacity for sulfur disproportionation is largely indistinguishable from that for sulfate reduction based on sequence data alone [5]. Mechanisms for elemental sulfur disproportionation are poorly understood, yet this process is of significant interest, particularly due to its ability to utilize an insoluble extracellular substrate. Most of the diversity of organisms shown to be capable of disproportionating elemental sulfur are members of the family of Desulfobacterota (formerly ) [4]. However, a small number of distantly related organisms are also capable of elemental sulfur disproportionation, although it remains unknown whether these lineages use the same or different pathways for sulfur disproportionation, and whether these pathways have evolved convergently or whether their distribution is the result of a single evolutionary innovation followed by horizontal gene transfer. In order to resolve these possibilities, we report here the draft genome sequence of SH388. This organism was first isolated from a shallow marine hydrothermal vent and was shown to be capable of disproportionating sulfur compounds (including elemental sulfur and sulfite) [6], but is of uncertain phylogenetic affinity within the Desulfobacterota and is not closely related to elemental sulfur disproportionators within the . Understanding the genetics and evolutionary history of sulfur metabolism in , in contrast to members of the , may therefore provide insight into the diversity, mechanism and evolution of sulfur disproportionation metabolisms more broadly.

Methods

Genome sequencing and analysis followed methods described previously [7, 8], and summarized here. Purified genomic DNA of strain DSM100025 was ordered from the DSMZ (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen) and submitted to MicrobesNG for sequencing. Cultures were grown anaerobically at 50 °C on medium 1210a ( medium) with strain-specific modifications, before genomic DNA extraction with a JetFlex genomic DNA purification kit (Genomed). DNA libraries were prepared with a Nextera XT library prep kit on a Hamilton Microlab Star automated liquid handling system. Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq using a 250 bp paired-end protocol. Reads were adapter trimmed using Trimmomatic 0.30 [9] and de novo assembly was performed using SPAdes version 3.7 [10]. Annotation was performed using rast v2.0 [11]. Genome completeness was estimated with CheckM v1.0.12 [12], and likelihood of presence or absence of metabolic pathways was estimated with MetaPOAP v1.0 [13]. The taxonomic assignment of the genome was verified with GTDB-Tk v0.3.2 [14]. Hydrogenase proteins were classified with HydDB [15]. Phylogenetic analyses followed methods described previously [16, 17], and summarized here. Additional Desulfobulbales genomes were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank and WGS databases. Protein sequences used in analyses (see below) were identified locally with the tblastn function of blast+ [18], aligned with muscle [19] and manually curated in Jalview [20]. Positive blast hits were considered to be full length (e.g. >90 % the shortest reference sequence from an isolate genome) with E values greater than 1×10−20. Phylogenetic trees were calculated using RAxML [21] on the CIPRES science gateway [22]. Transfer bootstrap support values were calculated by booster [23], and trees were visualized with the Interactive Tree of Life viewer [24]. Taxonomic assignment was confirmed with GTDB-Tk [14]. Histories of vertical versus horizontal inheritance of metabolic genes were inferred by comparison of organismal and metabolic protein phylogenies [25-27].

Results

The genome was sequenced at ~85× coverage as 508 907 reads. The assembled genome was recovered as 413 contigs (292 >500 nt, 194 >2500 nt) for a total of 2 536 728 nt with 70.82 mol% G+C and an N50 of 14 884. It encodes 2791 coding sequences and 53 RNAs. The genome was estimated by CheckM to be 96.75 % complete.

Discussion

When first isolated, was placed in the , but was not assigned at lower taxonomic ranks. Following genome-wide taxonomic analysis with GTDB-Tk, is robustly placed in the order Dissulfuribacterales (phylum Desulfobacterota, class Dissulfuribacteria), but does not cluster with any characterized families within this order (Fig. 1). is sufficiently divergent from its closest characterized relative, Dissulfuribacter thermophilus, to suggest that these organisms represent separate families within the Dissulfuribacterales. Therefore, we propose assignment of as the type species of a novel family, Dissulfurirhabdaceae, within the order Dissulfuribacterales of Desulfobacterota.
Fig. 1.

Phylogeny of the Desulfobacterota, showing the placement of relative to other lineages, built with concatenated ribosomal proteins following the methods of Hug et al. [38]. Strains are labelled with NCBI WGS database accession numbers and/or taxonomic assignments made with GTDB-Tk [14]. Scale bar represents average number of substitutions per site.

Phylogeny of the Desulfobacterota, showing the placement of relative to other lineages, built with concatenated ribosomal proteins following the methods of Hug et al. [38]. Strains are labelled with NCBI WGS database accession numbers and/or taxonomic assignments made with GTDB-Tk [14]. Scale bar represents average number of substitutions per site. Sulfur disproportionators are expected to encode the same marker genes as sulfate reducers ([5]; consistent with this expectation, encodes sulfate adenylyltransferase, adenylylsulfate reductase, dissimilatory sulfite reductase and the complex DsrMKJOP, which is associated with sulfite reduction. Known sulfur disproportionators in the family of Desulfobacterota encode AprB proteins with a truncated tail; this conserved truncation has been proposed as a molecular marker of the capacity for sulfur disproportionation [28]. encodes an AprB protein with a similar truncation despite encoding an AprB protein that is only distantly related to those of the (Fig. 2) – this suggests that the AprB truncation evolved independently in and the . This reinforces hypotheses for the association between this marker and the capacity for disproportionation as previously proposed [28]. Moreover, the apparently independent acquisition of the AprB truncation and the capacity for disproportionation in and members of the suggests that this might be a more widespread trait that has evolved convergently multiple times in ancestrally sulfate-reducing lineages. The relatively small number of physiologically and genomically characterized sulfur disproportionators available at this time limits our ability to confidently test this association, however, and so will necessitate further consideration as more data becomes available.
Fig. 2.

(a) Phylogeny of AprB proteins from members of the Desulfobacterota, with sequences from the Dissulfuribacterales (including ) and members of the Desulfobulbales highlighted in red. These groups include sulfur disproportionators that encode AprB proteins with a truncated tail, but they are not closely related and are separated by many lineages of non-disproportionating bacteria that encode full-length AprB proteins; therefore, it appears that these traits have convergently evolved in the two lineages. Scale bar represents average number of substitutions per site. (b) Multiple sequence alignment of AprB proteins showing the truncated tail (dashed red box) present in members of the Desulfobulbales (highlighted in yellow) and (highlighted in green), but not in other lineages such as or (highlighted in red).

(a) Phylogeny of AprB proteins from members of the Desulfobacterota, with sequences from the Dissulfuribacterales (including ) and members of the Desulfobulbales highlighted in red. These groups include sulfur disproportionators that encode AprB proteins with a truncated tail, but they are not closely related and are separated by many lineages of non-disproportionating bacteria that encode full-length AprB proteins; therefore, it appears that these traits have convergently evolved in the two lineages. Scale bar represents average number of substitutions per site. (b) Multiple sequence alignment of AprB proteins showing the truncated tail (dashed red box) present in members of the Desulfobulbales (highlighted in yellow) and (highlighted in green), but not in other lineages such as or (highlighted in red). is capable of autotrophic growth [6] and encodes CO dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase, suggesting it makes use of the reductive acetyl-CoA (Wood–Ljungdahl) pathway like many sulfate-reducing bacteria [29]. The genome encodes a hydrogenase annotated by HydDB as a group 1 c NiFe hydrogenase associated with anaerobic respiratory uptake of H2. does not encode canonical proteins for aerobic respiration or denitrification, consistent with its inability to use O2 or nitrate as electron acceptors in culture [6]. However, this organism encodes a cytochrome bd O2 reductase; while these enzymes can in some cases be coupled to aerobic respiration (e.g. in Nitrospira) [30], they are often found in obligate anaerobes [31] in which they are likely used for O2 detoxification and oxidative stress tolerance [32]. is capable of disproportionating not only soluble sulfur species such as sulfite, but also insoluble elemental sulfur [6]. The mechanism of elemental sulfur disproportionation in and other strains capable of this metabolism is not known yet, but likely involves novel extracellular electron transfer pathways. Extracellular multihaem cytochrome proteins are commonly involved in respiratory electron transfer to insoluble mineral substrates [33, 34], and could, therefore, be expected to be involved in disproportionation of elemental sulfur. Analysis of the genome with CXXCH_finder [33] recovered 81 proteins with haem-binding domains, including one hypothetical protein with 26 haem-binding motifs – on par with proteins from bacteria such as and , well known for their capacity for extracellular electron transfer and ability to respire extracellular mineral substrates [33]. In addition to haem-binding motifs, this hypothetical protein also encodes seven cytochrome c 3 motifs associated with extracellular iron respiration in [35]. This hypothetical protein shows low similarity to other proteins accessible on the NCBI database (<50 % to any sequence), but of all proteins from well-characterized organisms it is most similar to a hypothetical protein from , a thermophilic bacterium capable of elemental sulfur reduction. The putative extracellular electron transfer protein from also has notable similarity (~30 %) to extracellular iron oxide respiratory system periplasmic decahaem cytochrome c protein components from MR-1, including the protein DsmE associated with respiration of extracellular substrates [36]. Therefore, we propose that utilizes extracellular multihaem cytochrome proteins related to those in dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria in order to transfer electrons to insoluble substrates such as elemental sulfur. In contrast, members of the Desulfobulbales that are characterized as being capable of elemental sulfur disproportionation (e.g. , ) encode proteins with no more than 11 or 12 CxxCH motifs. However, it remains possible that the capacity for extracellular electron transport has convergently evolved in diverse lineages of sulfur disproportionators, but has so far remained undiagnosed. It has recently been shown that some cable bacteria – members of the Desulfobulbales notable for their capacity for long distance and extracellular electron transfer – may also be capable of sulfur disproportionation [37]. It is therefore likely that the co-occurrence of sulfur disproportionation and extracellular electron transport metabolisms may have evolved independently in multiple lineages of sulfate-reducing bacteria, potentially utilizing diverse mechanisms.

Conclusions

In addition to better constraining the phylogenetic placement and taxonomy of this organism, the draft genome of provides evidence for the evolutionary history of metabolic pathways it employs. This includes the apparent convergent evolution for the capacity for sulfur disproportionation in different lineages of Desulfobacterota (e.g. and members of ). These organisms appear to have evolved sulfur disproportionation via similar genetic mechanisms independently from an ancestral state of sulfate reduction. The presence of putative multihaem cytochrome proteins encoded by also suggests that the capacity for elemental sulfur disproportionation may in some cases utilize mechanisms homologous to those used in the respiration of extracellular electron acceptors such as metal oxides, as has been well studied in organisms such as and , demonstrating the versatility of micro-organisms to adapt proteins encoded in their genomes and acquired via horizontal gene transfer in order to develop novel metabolic traits.

Data Bibliography

Ward, LM, E Bertran, DT Johnston; NCBI BioProject; PRJNA579145 (2020). Ward, LM, E Bertran, DT Johnston; NCBI WGS; JAAGRR000000000 (2020). Ward, LM, E Bertran, DT Johnston; NCBI SRA; SRR11035951 (2020).
  32 in total

1.  A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life.

Authors:  Donovan H Parks; Maria Chuvochina; David W Waite; Christian Rinke; Adam Skarshewski; Pierre-Alain Chaumeil; Philip Hugenholtz
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Comparative genomics sheds light on niche differentiation and the evolutionary history of comammox Nitrospira.

Authors:  Alejandro Palomo; Anders G Pedersen; S Jane Fowler; Arnaud Dechesne; Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén; Barth F Smets
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Late Proterozoic rise in atmospheric oxygen concentration inferred from phylogenetic and sulphur-isotope studies.

Authors:  D E Canfield; A Teske
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-07-11       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  MetaPOAP: presence or absence of metabolic pathways in metagenome-assembled genomes.

Authors:  Lewis M Ward; Patrick M Shih; Woodward W Fischer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Evolutionary Implications of Anoxygenic Phototrophy in the Bacterial Phylum Candidatus Eremiobacterota (WPS-2).

Authors:  Lewis M Ward; Tanai Cardona; Hannah Holland-Moritz
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Geochemical and Metagenomic Characterization of Jinata Onsen, a Proterozoic-Analog Hot Spring, Reveals Novel Microbial Diversity including Iron-Tolerant Phototrophs and Thermophilic Lithotrophs.

Authors:  Lewis M Ward; Airi Idei; Mayuko Nakagawa; Yuichiro Ueno; Woodward W Fischer; Shawn E McGlynn
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Groundwater cable bacteria conserve energy by sulfur disproportionation.

Authors:  Hubert Müller; Sviatlana Marozava; Alexander J Probst; Rainer U Meckenstock
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology.

Authors:  Ramy K Aziz; Daniela Bartels; Aaron A Best; Matthew DeJongh; Terrence Disz; Robert A Edwards; Kevin Formsma; Svetlana Gerdes; Elizabeth M Glass; Michael Kubal; Folker Meyer; Gary J Olsen; Robert Olson; Andrei L Osterman; Ross A Overbeek; Leslie K McNeil; Daniel Paarmann; Tobias Paczian; Bruce Parrello; Gordon D Pusch; Claudia Reich; Rick Stevens; Olga Vassieva; Veronika Vonstein; Andreas Wilke; Olga Zagnitko
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Draft Genome Sequence of Acidianus ambivalens DSM 3772, an Aerobic Thermoacidophilic Sulfur Disproportionator.

Authors:  Emma Bertran; Lewis M Ward; David T Johnston
Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc       Date:  2020-01-16

10.  Draft Genome Sequence of Desulfofundulus thermobenzoicus subsp. thermosyntrophicus DSM 14055, a Moderately Thermophilic Sulfate Reducer.

Authors:  Emma Bertran; Lewis M Ward; David T Johnston
Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc       Date:  2020-01-16
View more
  1 in total

1.  Genomic Characterization and Environmental Distribution of a Thermophilic Anaerobe Dissulfurirhabdus thermomarina SH388T Involved in Disproportionation of Sulfur Compounds in Shallow Sea Hydrothermal Vents.

Authors:  Maxime Allioux; Stéven Yvenou; Galina Slobodkina; Alexander Slobodkin; Zongze Shao; Mohamed Jebbar; Karine Alain
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-07-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.