| Literature DB >> 32553019 |
Bede Constantinides1,2,3, Kevin K Chau3,1,2, T Phuong Quan3,1,2, Gillian Rodger1,2,3, Monique I Andersson4, Katie Jeffery4, Sam Lipworth1, Hyun S Gweon5, Andy Peniket6, Graham Pike7, Julian Millo8, Mary Byukusenge9, Matt Holdaway8, Cat Gibbons7, Amy J Mathers10,9, Derrick W Crook1,2,3,4, Timothy E A Peto3,4,1,2, A Sarah Walker1,2,3, Nicole Stoesser4,1,2,3.
Abstract
Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. are important human pathogens that cause a wide spectrum of clinical disease. In healthcare settings, sinks and other wastewater sites have been shown to be reservoirs of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli and Klebsiella spp., particularly in the context of outbreaks of resistant strains amongst patients. Without focusing exclusively on resistance markers or a clinical outbreak, we demonstrate that many hospital sink drains are abundantly and persistently colonized with diverse populations of E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella oxytoca, including both antimicrobial-resistant and susceptible strains. Using whole-genome sequencing of 439 isolates, we show that environmental bacterial populations are largely structured by ward and sink, with only a handful of lineages, such as E. coli ST635, being widely distributed, suggesting different prevailing ecologies, which may vary as a result of different inputs and selection pressures. Whole-genome sequencing of 46 contemporaneous patient isolates identified one (2 %; 95 % CI 0.05-11 %) E. coli urine infection-associated isolate with high similarity to a prior sink isolate, suggesting that sinks may contribute to up to 10 % of infections caused by these organisms in patients on the ward over the same timeframe. Using metagenomics from 20 sink-timepoints, we show that sinks also harbour many clinically relevant antimicrobial resistance genes including bla CTX-M, bla SHV and mcr, and may act as niches for the exchange and amplification of these genes. Our study reinforces the potential role of sinks in contributing to Enterobacterales infection and antimicrobial resistance in hospital patients, something that could be amenable to intervention. This article contains data hosted by Microreact.Entities:
Keywords: Enterobacterales; antibiotic resistance; resistome; sinks; wastewater
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32553019 PMCID: PMC7478627 DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000391
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Genom ISSN: 2057-5858
Fig. 1.Cluster distribution and persistence. Left: strain-distinct cultured isolates of , and from sink drain aspirates sampled over 12 weeks across three hospital wards. Different colours indicate distinct strains (defined by 100 SNP clusters), and cefpodoxime-resistant and/or selected ESBL-positive isolates are indicated by filled markers. Right: persistence of sink and contemporaneous patient strains throughout the sampling period.
Spatiotemporal distribution of 100 core SNP lineages of cultured (n=53), (n=51) and (n=30) (a) overall, and (b) occurring in >1 isolate in sinks on wards that were repeatedly sampled
|
(a) |
|
|
|
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
|
Patient |
28 |
1 |
3 |
32 | |
|
Sink |
3 |
37 |
12 |
52 | |
|
| |||||
|
Single timepoint |
Same sink |
5 |
6 |
3 |
14 |
|
Different sinks; same ward |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 | |
|
Multiple timepoints |
Same sink |
7 |
1 |
7 |
15 |
|
Different sinks; same ward |
1 |
4 |
4 |
9 | |
|
Different wards |
3 |
1 |
0 |
4 | |
|
Patients |
Patient and sink (single timepoint) |
1* |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Same patient |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 | |
|
Different patients |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 | |
|
Total |
53 |
51 |
30 |
134 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
|
Single timepoint |
Same sink |
5 |
4 |
3 |
12 |
|
Different sinks; same ward |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | |
|
Multiple timepoints |
Same sink |
8 |
1 |
7 |
16 |
|
Different sinks; same ward |
1 |
4 |
4 |
9 | |
|
Different wards |
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 | |
|
Total |
16 |
10 |
14 |
40 | |
*Lineage has three isolates; all taken from the same ward; two from the same sink at the same timepointand one from a patient 2 months later.
Fig. 2.Taxonomic composition of sink microbiota from metagenomic sequencing. Top: relative abundance of the 20 most abundant bacterial species among sink drain aspirates (Kraken), inset with a corresponding multidimensional scaling (MDS) projection of pairwise distances between samples. Centre: spike-normalized relative abundance of species classifications at or below the order Enterobacterales among sink-timepoints. Bottom: spike-normalized relative abundance of Kraken classifications at or below the superkingdom bacteria.
Fig. 3.Maximum-likelihood phylogenies of , and cultured from sink drain aspirates sampled over 12 weeks across three wards, with two enlargements corresponding to an ST635 neighbour-joining MASH subtree whose tips are coloured by sink, and genetic overlap between a sink culture and a urine culture from a patient with ward contact during the study. Tip colours indicate strains, with rings inside-to-out denoting: patient/sink, sink designation, sequence type, and ESBL genotype.
Fig. 4.Antimicrobial resistance gene content of cultured isolates and sink drain metagenomes. Left: lateral coverage of ResPipe/CARD genes within sink drain and clinical isolates. Displayed genes attained >=75 % lateral coverage in one or more isolates. Right: corresponding lateral coverage of the same genes in sink drain aspirate metagenomes.
Fig. 5.Metagenomic containment of sink (left) and patient (centre) cultured lineage-representative genome assemblies, and control genomes (right). Shared k-mer hashes and median k-mer multiplicity values are as reported by MASH Screen. SSST=same sink and same timepoint; SSDT=same sink at different timepoints (shared hashes Mann–Whitney P=0.013 vs. SSST); DSSW=different sinks of the same ward (P<0.0001 vs. SSDT); DSDW=sinks on a different ward (P<0.0001 vs. DSSW). SW=lineage-representative assemblies of clinical isolates in the same ward; DW=lineage-representative assemblies of clinical isolates from a different ward (P<0.0001 vs. SW). Control genomes comprised , K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, , , , and , shown abbreviated with binomial initials. A case of within-ward sink-patient overlap is highlighted with red markers, corresponding to high strain containment in the metagenomes of sink A25 timepoints 1 and 4.