| Literature DB >> 32552757 |
Shilpa Karvande1, Vidula Purohit1, Somasundari Somla Gopalakrishnan2, B Subha Sri2, Matthews Mathai2, Nerges Mistry3.
Abstract
Auxiliary nurse midwives (ANMs) play a pivotal role in provision of maternal and newborn health at primary level in India. Effective in-service training is crucial for upgrading their knowledge and skills for providing appropriate healthcare services. This paper aims at assessing the effectiveness of a complementary mix of directed and self-directed learning approaches for building essential maternal and newborn health-related skills of ANMs in rural Pune District, India.Entities:
Keywords: Auxiliary nurse midwives; Capacity building; In-service training; India; Maternal and child health; Self-directed learning; Skill-based learning
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32552757 PMCID: PMC7301994 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-020-00485-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Resour Health ISSN: 1478-4491
Characteristics of participating ANMs
| Sr. no. | Characteristics | Participating ANMs ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| % | |||
| 22–35 | 91 | 27 | |
| 36–55 | 239 | 70 | |
| ≥ 56 | 11 | 3 | |
| ≤ 10 | 97 | 28 | |
| 11–20 | 100 | 29 | |
| 21–30 | 80 | 24 | |
| >30 | 64 | 19 | |
| 230 | 67 | ||
Knowledge and skill scores—pre- and post-training assessment scores (%)
| Assessment | Participating ANMs ( | Pre-training median scores (%) | IQR | Post-training median scores (%) | IQR | Change in median score (%) | IQR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 311 | 60.0 | 53.3–63.3 | 73.3 | 70.0–80.0 | 13.3 | 10.0–23.3 | |
| 224 | 20.0 | 10.0–30.0 | 90.0 | 80.0–95.0 | 70.0 | 55.0–80.0 | |
| 225 | 15.0 | 10.0–30.0 | 85.0 | 70.0–90.0 | 60.0 | 45.0–75.0 | |
| 216 | 25.0 | 20.0–35.0 | 90.0 | 80.0–95.0 | 60.0 | 50.0–70.0 | |
| 230 | 26.6 | 20.0–66.6 | 80.0 | 60.0–93.3 | 26.6 | 6.6–60.0 |
IQR interquartile range
Effect of age groups and work experience of participating ANMs on improvement in knowledge and skills
| Improvement | Age groups (in years) | Work experience (years) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean rank* | Chi-square | Mean rank* | Chi-square | |||||||||
| 20–35 | 36–55 | ≥ 56 | ≤ 10 | 11–20 | 21–30 | > 30 | ||||||
| Knowledge | 311 | 172.7 | 149.8 | 142.9 | 4.274 | 0.118 | 169.2 | 151.6 | 152.4 | 146.5 | 2.942 | 0.401 |
| Maternal resuscitation | 224 | 125.4 | 108.9 | 72.3 | 6.216 | 125.4 | 106.8 | 119.3 | 90.2 | 8.757 | ||
| Newborn resuscitation | 225 | 132.0 | 107.2 | 64.4 | 11.368 | 132 | 111.4 | 106.7 | 90.4 | 11.575 | ||
| Management of eclampsia | 216 | 115.9 | 105.8 | 96.8 | 1.478 | 0.478 | 114.3 | 103.0 | 100.7 | 116.9 | 2.535 | 0.469 |
| Use of partograph | 230 | 115.8 | 114.4 | 134.8 | 0.725 | 0.478 | 116.3 | 113.2 | 114.5 | 118.8 | 0.198 | 0.978 |
*The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare pre-test to post-test improvement in knowledge and skills across age groups and work experience
Distribution of super achievers as per age groups and work experience
| Test | Number of ANMs participated in the test | Number of super achiever ANMs* | Age group | Work experience | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22–35 years | 36–55 years | 56 years and more | 10 years or less | 11–20 years | 21–30 years | 30 years and more | |||
| Knowledge | 311 | 0 (0%) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Maternal resuscitation | 224 | 80 (36%) | 37 | 43 | 0 | 39 | 21 | 15 | 5 |
| Newborn resuscitation | 225 | 44 (20%) | 19 | 25 | 0 | 21 | 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Management of eclampsia | 216 | 63 (29%) | 26 | 37 | 0 | 28 | 18 | 8 | 9 |
| Use of partograph | 230 | 13 (6%) | 5 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
Participating ANMs’ performance in retention test compared to the post-training assessment
| Comparative performance during assessment of retention | Number of participating ANMs (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge test ( | Maternal resuscitation ( | Newborn resuscitation ( | Management of eclampsia ( | Use of partograph ( | |
| Retained* same scores | 38 | 38 | 30 | 45 | 18 |
| Scored more** | 22 | 18 | 14 | 14 | 46 |
| Scored less*** | 40 | 44 | 56 | 41 | 36 |
*Retained—retained same or deviation of ± 5% from post-training scores
**Scored more—> 5% of their immediate post-training scores
***Scored less—< 5% of their immediate post-training scores
Examples highlighting application of learning to practice
| Sr. no. | Areas | Change/improvement | Example/s | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Diagnosis | Early and correct diagnosis | 1. Need for suction among newborns 2. Identification of high risks during labour | ‘Before this training, my ANMs would call me during nights for deliveries, especially plotting partograph. But now, they plot the partographs and only if there is any life-threatening condition, they call me to take my opinion’—Medical Officer PHC |
| 2 | Case management | Correct management | 1. Routine ANC care 2. Newborn resuscitation | ‘I first give a left lateral position to every pregnant woman; I do not forget it.’—ANM ‘I conducted a normal [vaginal] delivery. The baby did not cry. I immediately resuscitated the baby and the baby cried. Earlier at such times, we used to be scared. This time I could handle the case confidently.’—ANM |
| 3 | Confidence during case management | Increased confidence for giving drug/s | 1. Use of magnesium sulphate for eclampsia management | ‘I recently received feedback from the field that two ANMs gave Magsulf and managed the case. We wanted to promote this they used to be anxious about it and we couldn’t do it and now it is happening.’—District health official |