Literature DB >> 32552152

Comparison of End Tidal Carbon Monoxide Levels between Conventional Cigarette, Electronic Cigarette and Heated Tobacco Product among Asiatic Smokers.

Janice Diong Li Nga1, S Lokman Hakim2, Sobia Bilal3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and heated tobacco products (HTPs) are noncombustible tobacco products which have been found to generate aerosols containing lower levels of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHCs) in comparison to conventional cigarettes. Objective: This quasi experimental study measured and compared the end tidal carbon monoxide (eCO) levels of participants after use of ENDS, HTPs and conventional cigarettes.
Methods: In total 45 smokers, each smoking at least 10 conventional cigarettes per day for 5 years participated in the study. Based on their preference, participants used only one of the tobacco products (ENDS, HTPs, or conventional cigarette) and were briefed about the product use based on manufacturer's instructions. The eCO levels were obtained at baseline, followed by 5, 10, 15, 30 and 45 min respectively after the product use.
Results: There was significant increase in eCO levels for conventional cigarettes as compared to other modes. Peak eCO levels of 20.2 ± 0.86 ppm, 8.8 ± 1.56 ppm and 6.0 ± 1.36 ppm was achieved at 30 min, 15 min and 10 min for conventional cigarettes, ENDS and HTPs respectively. However, the levels were significantly lower in ENDS and HTPs.
Conclusion: Even though ENDS and HTPs may have produced significantly lower eCO than conventional cigarettes, the significantly increasing levels over time from baseline which was not shown before is a cause of concern. As of now, their use as an alternate to cigarettes needs to be considered under regulatory framework.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon monoxide; Electronic nicotine delivery systems; conventional cigarettes; heated tobacco products; noncombustible tobacco products

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32552152     DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1781180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Subst Use Misuse        ISSN: 1082-6084            Impact factor:   2.164


  2 in total

Review 1.  Improving on estimates of the potential relative harm to health from using modern ENDS (vaping) compared to tobacco smoking.

Authors:  Nick Wilson; Jennifer A Summers; Driss Ait Ouakrim; Janet Hoek; Richard Edwards; Tony Blakely
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.135

2.  Correction: Improving on estimates of the potential relative harm to health from using modern ENDS (vaping) compared to tobacco smoking.

Authors:  Nick Wilson; Jennifer A Summers; Driss Ait Ouakrim; Janet Hoek; Richard Edwards; Tony Blakely
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.135

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.