Literature DB >> 32551284

Transnasal Transsphenoidal Approach for Pituitary Tumors: An ENT Perspective.

Vaibhav A Chandankhede1, S K Singh1, Ravi Roy1, Sunil Goyal1, M S Sridhar2, M S Gill2.   

Abstract

Endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal (ETNTS) approach was first described in 1992 and is standard approach for the resection of benign pituitary adenomas. This prospective study aims in incidence and preoperative assessment of extent of the pituitary adenoma, peroperative findings of transnasal transsphenoidal excision, techniques of skull base repair, complications and its management in a tertiary centre. A prospective analysis from Jan 2017 to May 2019, of patients undergoing ETNTS approach of pituitary adenomas was made in terms of incidence in various age-groups, type of adenoma, operative findings including CSF leak, repair of the skull base defect, complications encountered and its management was done in a tertiary care centre and compared with the present literature. A total of 141 patients underwent ETNTS, with highest number of cases found in 41-50 years age-group with mean age of 42.6 years. Male: Female ratio was 1.6. Macroadenoma was in 123 patients while 18 had microadenoma, of these 63.74% were functional adenoma, highest of GH secreting, while 36.26% were non-functional. Mean surgical time was 98.4 min ± 21.2 min. Peroperative CSF leak was in 30.5% cases in various grades. Closure techniques included use of fat, multilayer techniques, Hadad's flap and gasket technique as per the type of CSF leak. Neurological and rhinological complications were 6.38% each. This study is focused on the ENT perspective of the endoscopic transnasal trans-sphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas. The reduced rate of morbidity and complications is encouraging. The endoscopic skull base defect closure is challenging and requires skill, meticulous approach and synchronised team work in order to achieve a favourable outcome. The incidence of CSF leak can be minimised and if encountered has to be dealt in an organised manner, thus contributing to a reduced rate of complications. The complications encountered must be foreseen and managed with a proficient approach. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pituitary adenoma; Postoperative complications; Transnasal transsphenoidal approach

Year:  2020        PMID: 32551284      PMCID: PMC7276463          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-01803-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  36 in total

1.  Modified Graded Repair of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Park; Jai Ho Choi; Young-Il Kim; Sung Won Kim; Yong-Kil Hong
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-07-31

2.  MR imaging of pituitary adenoma: CT, clinical, and surgical correlation.

Authors:  P C Davis; J C Hoffman; T Spencer; G T Tindall; I F Braun
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery at a VA Hospital.

Authors:  Michael Jones; Stephen Johans; Andrea Ziegler; Kevin C Welch; Monica O Patadia; Chirag R Patel; Anand V Germanwala
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  The learning curve for endoscopic trans-sphenoidal resection of pituitary macroadenomas. A single institution experience, Leeds, UK.

Authors:  James M W Robins; Seyed A Alavi; Atul K Tyagi; Paul A Nix; Tom M Wilson; Nick I Phillips
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap.

Authors:  Gustavo Hadad; Luis Bassagasteguy; Ricardo L Carrau; Juan C Mataza; Amin Kassam; Carl H Snyderman; Arlan Mintz
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Comparison of quality of life after transnasal endoscopic vs open skull base tumor resection.

Authors:  Avraham Abergel; Oren Cavel; Nevo Margalit; Dan M Fliss; Ziv Gil
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-02

7.  Complications associated with microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: experience of 1153 consecutive cases treated at a single tertiary care pituitary center.

Authors:  Matthew S Agam; Michelle A Wedemeyer; Bozena Wrobel; Martin H Weiss; John D Carmichael; Gabriel Zada
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Evolution of the graded repair of CSF leaks and skull base defects in endonasal endoscopic tumor surgery: trends in repair failure and meningitis rates in 509 patients.

Authors:  Andrew Conger; Fan Zhao; Xiaowen Wang; Amalia Eisenberg; Chester Griffiths; Felice Esposito; Ricardo L Carrau; Garni Barkhoudarian; Daniel F Kelly
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 9.  Recent Evolution of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Treatment of Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nishioka
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  A Spectacular Endoscopic Anatomy of the Pituitary Gland and the Circle of Willis in a Living Person.

Authors:  Mohammad Sadegh Masoudi; Seyed Hossein Owji
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2019-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.