Abbas Beheshti Askari1, Mustafa Al Samarai1, Bruno Morana2, Lukas Tillmann3, Norbert Pfänder1, Aleksandra Wandzilak1, Benjamin Watts4, Rachid Belkhou5, Martin Muhler1,3, Serena DeBeer1. 1. Max Planck Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion, Stiftstraße 34-36, Mülheim an der Ruhr D-45470, Germany. 2. NanoInsight, Feldmannweg 17, 2628 CT Delft, The Netherlands. 3. Laboratory of Industrial Chemistry, Ruhr-University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, Bochum D-44801, Germany. 4. Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI 5232, Switzerland. 5. Synchrotron SOLEIL, L'Orme des Merisiers, Saint-Aubin - BP 48, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex F-91192, France.
Abstract
Herein, we report the synthesis of a γ-Al2O3-supported NiCo catalyst for dry methane reforming (DMR) and study the catalyst using in situ scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM) during the reduction (activation step) and under reaction conditions. During the reduction process, the NiCo alloy particles undergo elemental segregation with Co migrating toward the center of the catalyst particles and Ni migrating to the outer surfaces. Under DMR conditions, the segregated structure is maintained, thus hinting at the importance of this structure to optimal catalytic functions. Finally, the formation of Ni-rich branches on the surface of the particles is observed during DMR, suggesting that the loss of Ni from the outer shell may play a role in the reduced stability and hence catalyst deactivation. These findings provide insights into the morphological and electronic structural changes that occur in a NiCo-based catalyst during DMR. Further, this study emphasizes the need to study catalysts under operating conditions in order to elucidate material dynamics during the reaction.
Herein, we report the synthesis of a γ-Al2O3-supported NiCo catalyst for dry methane reforming (DMR) and study the catalyst using in situ scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM) during the reduction (activation step) and under reaction conditions. During the reduction process, the NiCo alloy particles undergo elemental segregation with Co migrating toward the center of the catalyst particles and Ni migrating to the outer surfaces. Under DMR conditions, the segregated structure is maintained, thus hinting at the importance of this structure to optimal catalytic functions. Finally, the formation of Ni-rich branches on the surface of the particles is observed during DMR, suggesting that the loss of Ni from the outer shell may play a role in the reduced stability and hence catalyst deactivation. These findings provide insights into the morphological and electronic structural changes that occur in a NiCo-based catalyst during DMR. Further, this study emphasizes the need to study catalysts under operating conditions in order to elucidate material dynamics during the reaction.
The emission of greenhouse
gases associated with the combustion
of fossil fuels is believed to be the main cause of global warming.[1,2] Lowering the concentration of these gases is therefore a matter
of utmost importance. An attractive approach would be the development
of environmentally friendly processes capable of reusing these gases
as feedstock for industrial processes. In this context, a reaction
that has received much attention is dry methane reforming (DMR).[3−5] In this reaction, two major greenhouse gases, methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2), are converted into hydrogen
(H2) and carbon monoxide (CO), otherwise known as syngas.
The DMR reaction (eq ) together with the side reactions (eqs –5) proceeding under non-ideal
conditions are reported below[6−8]In the literature, various
classes of materials, including noble
metals, spinels, hydrotalcites, and supported base metals, have been
reported as catalysts for the DMR process.[9−11] Among these
catalysts, noble metals show the highest activity and stability toward
this reaction but are economically not attractive.[12] In recent years, various studies focused on the development
of late 3d transition metal-based systems as an alternative to costly
noble metals for DMR catalysis.[9−11,13] Within this context, nickel (Ni)-based catalysts are promising candidates
due to their relatively high activity and earth abundance. Nevertheless,
the major drawback of monometallic Ni-based catalysts when compared
to noble metal-based catalysts is their lower activity and higher
susceptibility to deactivation due to coke formation via either methane
cracking or the reverse Boudouard reaction.[14−19] In order to increase catalyst activity and stability, researchers
have implemented various approaches including (i) depositing the catalytic
active phase on different support materials,[20,21] (ii) reducing the catalyst, particle size,[22,23] (iii) developing bimetallic catalysts based on transition metals,[24−27] and (iv) transition metal-based core–shell nanoarchitectures.[28−30] It has been shown that core-shell systems have the ability to prevent
metal sintering and decrease carbon formation, while the production
of bimetallic catalysts has been very successful in increasing the
catalyst activity, stability, and selectivity. Among 3d transition
metals, the addition of cobalt (Co) to Ni-based DMR catalysts results
in the highest increase in activity. This has been ascribed to the
optimal catalytic performance of the Ni/Co alloy.[31,32] Within this context, Zhang et al. investigated NiCo catalyst samples
with various Ni and Co loadings and established that a lower Co concentration
results in an increased catalytic activity and stability and prevents
the coke formation side reaction to a large extent.[33] An operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) study by
Takanabe et al. revealed that Co increases the capacity of CO2 adsorption, which eventually leads to carbon elimination
from the catalyst surface.[34] Furthermore,
in the same study, the presence of a homogeneous NiCo alloy was directly
correlated to the DMR activity. This finding was supported by a combined
in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS) study by Bonifacio and co-workers, which revealed
that NiCo core–shell particles tend to form a homogeneous alloy
at high temperatures (600 °C).[35] In
addition, an ex situ TEM and in situ XPS study by Carenco et al. revealed
that under reducing conditions and low temperatures (270 °C)
the morphology of NiCo particles changes into a structure consisting
of NiCo alloy shell and a nickel-rich core.[36] From these studies and many others reported in the literature,[36−40] the formation of a NiCo alloy seems to play a crucial role in optimizing
the DMR activity. However, none of these studies were performed at
optimal operating temperatures for DMR (>700 °C).[34] The differences between the particle morphology
at low and high temperatures[35,36] suggest that it is
necessary to follow the electronic structure and elemental distributions
of Co and Ni during both the reductive activation step and under DMR
conditions.In general, the scarce information regarding the
role of transition
metals in methane reforming catalysis is mainly due to the lack of
experimental techniques capable of simultaneously probing the changes
in the electronic structure and visualizing the morphology of the
active phase under operating conditions. Within this context, scanning
transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM) is a promising technique whereby
soft X-ray spectroscopy is combined with 2D microscopy. Recently,
it has been reported that by employing microfabricated monolithic
nanoreactors,[41] together with a specifically
designed in situ gas-phase setup, the changes in the particle morphology
and electronic structure of the catalytic active phase can be imaged
and probed under operating conditions.[42−44] The specific combination
of nanoreactors and an in situ gas-phase setup developed for this
study allowed simultaneously operating at temperatures (750 °C)
and pressures (3.0 bar) that are higher than those until now reported
for in situ STXM studies.[44,45] This advancement is
key for studying catalysts under industrially relevant conditions.
Herein, we first present a synthetic method for a bimetallic alumina-supported
NiCo DMR catalyst followed by in situ STXM characterization of the
catalyst performed during the reductive activation step and under
DMR operating conditions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the
first in situ STXM study of a bimetallic DMR catalyst. These data
are crucial for the understanding of the catalytic dynamics involved
in the reforming of methane and thus are fundamental to the development
of catalysts with superior properties.
Experimental Section
Catalyst
Synthesis
For the synthesis, cobalt(II) acetate
tetrahydrate (>98%, Sigma Aldrich), nickel(II) acetate tetrahydrate
(99.998%, Sigma Aldrich), ammonium oxalate monohydrate (98%, Alfa
Aesar), methanol (99%, Alfa Aesar), 1-hexanol (99%, Alfa Aesar), and n-hexane 99% gamma alumina catalyst support (surface area
of 200 m2/g, Alfa Aesar) were employed.The NiCoO/γAl2O3 catalyst
was synthesized according to the modified reverse micellar method.[46,47] The advantage of this synthesis method is that it enables the production
of a bimetallic catalyst with controlled size and elemental ratios
incorporating late transition metals. Other methods are mainly focused
on the synthesize of small particles with the aim of increasing the
activity[22,23,48] and limiting
coke formation.[49,50] In contrast, for STXM characterizations,
where the spatial resolution is limited, larger particles are desired.
By using the modified micellar method, we successfully produced highly
active and stable particles, which have the ideal size for STXM characterizations.
The first step in the production of the bimetallic catalyst involved
preparing four different mixtures. Herein, 2.3 g of ammonium oxalate
monohydrate, 2.0 g of nickel acetate tetrahydrate, and 0.71 g of cobalt
acetate tetrahydrate were separately dissolved in 15 mL of water and
stirred for 15 min to obtain three different solutions. The fourth
mixture was prepared by mixing and stirring 0.9 g of cetyltrimethylammonium
bromide, 9 mL of hexanol, and 12.6 mL of hexane for 20 min. This mixture
was divided into three equal parts, and each of these was then added
to the first three mixtures and stirred for another 20 min. In the
last stage, all solutions were added together and stirred for 48 h
to obtain the bimetallic catalyst. The produced catalyst was purified
by centrifuging at 5500 rpm for 5 min and washed with a mixture of
30 mL of methanol and 30 mL of chloroform. This procedure was followed
by centrifugation at 5500 rpm for 10 min and drying at 50 °C
for 12 h. To deposit the bimetallic catalyst on a support, 2.5 mL
of water was added to the prepared catalyst and 0.8 g of γ-Al2O3 was added to the solution. This was then stirred
for 20 min and dried at 90 °C for 12 h. The final phase of this
process included calcining the supported catalyst at 400 °C for
10 h in an argon atmosphere. In the study by Fakeeha and Al-Fatesh,
it was shown that a low calcination temperature results in a large
surface area of Ni-based DMR catalysts.[51] This simple method allows the production of a wide variety of catalysts
by selecting the desired metal acetates. In addition, the size of
the active phase can be tuned by varying the amount of water and metal
acetates used in this process. Figure S1 shows the complete synthesis route used in this study to produce
the NiCoO/γ-Al2O3 catalyst.
Scanning Transmission
Electron Microscopy (STEM) Experiments
For the STEM measurements,
a polymer-coated Cu TEM grid was immersed
in the dry catalyst powder. The morphology and elemental distribution
of the catalyst were imaged by using the Hitachi HD-2700 spherical
aberration-corrected STEM. Images were acquired with an acceleration
voltage of 200 kV. In addition, energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra
were recorded with an EDAX Octane T Ultra W 200 mm2 SDD
attached to the STEM microscope.
Activity Measurements
For the activity measurements,
the setup described in the work of Muhler et al. was employed.[52] The effluent gas was analyzed using an Agilent
3000 Micro-GC equipped with PLOT-Q and Molsieve 5A PLOT columns and
a TCD for quantification. The gases employed for the activity measurements
were 10% H2 diluted in N2 (purity, 99.999%),
CH4 (purity, 99.995%), CO2 (purity, 99.995%),
and N2 (purity, 99.999%).The first step of the activity
experiments involved sieving 50 mg of the supported NiCo catalyst
to obtain nanoparticles smaller than 200 μm. Subsequently, these
were loaded in the fixed-bed reactor and activated by flowing 10%
H2 in N2 (flow rate of 100 mL min–1), for a time of 20 min and with a set temperature of 850 °C.
Finally, the activity was measured for 15 h under DMR conditions,
that is, by flowing a gas mixture of 7% CH4 and 9.5% CO2 in N2 (flow rate of 490 mL min–1). We note that due to the configuration of the employed setup and
more interestingly to the endothermicity of the DMR reaction, causing
by itself a cold spot in the center of the fixed-bed reactor, the
temperature in the center of the bed deviates from the set temperature.[52] Therefore, during our activity measurements,
a temperature of 800 °C was set to obtain an approximate temperature
of 750 °C at the catalyst.
The TPR profile was recorded
in a quartz cell filled with 81.9 mg
of the calcined catalysts. The sample was heated up to 850 °C
with a rate of 6 °C/min in a continuous flow of 4.6% H2 in Ar (purity, 99.99), adding up to a total volume of 84.1 mL min–1. The H2 consumption was determined by
using a thermal conductivity analyzer (Hydros 100, Rosemount).
STXM
The STXM measurements for the particle shown in Figure were performed at
the PolLux beamline of the Paul Scherrer Institute,[53,54] while the particle shown in Figure was measured at the Hermes beamline at SOLEIL synchrotron
radiation facility. The spatial resolution of the zone plates was
35 nm for both beamlines. The first stage of the STXM experiment involved
measuring the calcined sample. Next, the sample was exposed to reducing
conditions (5% H2 in Ar) while gradually increasing the
temperature from 25 to 750 °C. During the activation process,
the pressure was increased up to 3.0 bar with the aim of accelerating
the reduction. Additional measurements performed at 1.5 bar and 500
°C/750 °C showed only minor changes in the particle size
and no detectable variations in its morphology (see the Supporting
Information Figure S2). Finally, the sample
was investigated under DMR conditions, that is, by flowing a
gas mixture of 7% CH4 and 5% CO2 diluted in
N2, at a pressure of 1.0 bar, and at temperature of 750
°C.
Figure 1
Elemental composition maps showing the distribution of Ni (in green)
and Co (in violet) for (a) freshly calcined particles, (b) following
the reduction step at 500 °C under 5% H2 in Ar, where
the Ni and Co oxides are reduced, and (c) at 750 °C and under
5% H2 in Ar flow where the Ni and Co Al2O4 are fully reduced. This last image confirms the elemental
segregation within the large agglomerates upon full reduction.
Figure 2
Elemental composition maps of the nanoparticle under study.
(a)
Acquired after reduction and confirming the elemental segregation
within the large agglomerates. (b) Acquired after exposure to DMR
conditions for 1 minute and (c) 120 minutes. In (b) the increase of
the Ni concentration in certain locations of the surface is visible
and indicated with red arrows. In (c) the formation of Ni branches
starting form the surface of the nanoparticle is visible and emphasized
in the close up.
Elemental composition maps showing the distribution of Ni (in green)
and Co (in violet) for (a) freshly calcined particles, (b) following
the reduction step at 500 °C under 5% H2 in Ar, where
the Ni and Co oxides are reduced, and (c) at 750 °C and under
5% H2 in Ar flow where the Ni and Co Al2O4 are fully reduced. This last image confirms the elemental
segregation within the large agglomerates upon full reduction.Elemental composition maps of the nanoparticle under study.
(a)
Acquired after reduction and confirming the elemental segregation
within the large agglomerates. (b) Acquired after exposure to DMR
conditions for 1 minute and (c) 120 minutes. In (b) the increase of
the Ni concentration in certain locations of the surface is visible
and indicated with red arrows. In (c) the formation of Ni branches
starting form the surface of the nanoparticle is visible and emphasized
in the close up.
Results
STEM
STEM images of the calcined sample displayed the
formation of large agglomerates consisting of coalesced nanoparticles
in the range of 5–20 nm (Figure a and Figure S3). In addition,
energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) data showed the distribution
of Co (violet) and Ni (green) oxides (Figure b–d) on the alumina support (yellow).
Moreover, it is shown that both Ni and Co are not homogeneously distributed
throughout the large agglomerates, and specific domains with mainly
a NiO character are also encountered as determined from X-ray diffraction
(XRD) (Figure S4). Furthermore, the metal
loadings in atomic % for the NiCoO/γ-Al2O3 catalyst were predetermined from the bulk EDX
analysis and corresponded to 56.4% (oxygen), 1.1% (cobalt), 9.2% (nickel),
and 33.3% (aluminum). In addition, the Ni/Co ratio in this sample
was close to 9:1 (Figure S5).
Figure 3
(a) Bright-field
STEM image of the catalyst calcinated at
400 °C. (b–e) STEM-EDX elemental mapping images of Co,
O, Ni, and Al shown in violet, blue, green, and yellow, respectively.
(c) Measured oxygen signal originating from the metal oxides and the
alumina.
(a) Bright-field
STEM image of the catalyst calcinated at
400 °C. (b–e) STEM-EDX elemental mapping images of Co,
O, Ni, and Al shown in violet, blue, green, and yellow, respectively.
(c) Measured oxygen signal originating from the metal oxides and the
alumina.
TPR and Catalytic Activity
Tests
Prior to the in situ
STXM experiment, the TPR profile and the catalytic activity for the
NiCoO/γ-Al2O3DMR catalyst were measured
(Figure S6). The TPR profile shows the
presence of two clear reduction peaks and suggests the reduction of
metal oxides in the temperature range of 250–500 °C. The
first peak at 265 °C is assigned to the reduction of Co3+ species to Co2+, whereas the main peak at 325 °C
is assigned to the reduction of Ni2+ and Co2+ to their metallic states.[55−58] Furthermore, these data indicate that full reduction
of the metal oxides into the metallic state already occurs at temperatures
lower than 500 °C. Next, the DMR activity of the NiCoO/γ-Al2O3 catalyst was investigated at a lab scale via
a fixed-bed reactor by loading 50 mg of the catalyst particles that
were sieved down to <200 μm. In the first stage of the experiment,
the catalyst was activated by performing a reduction treatment under
10% H2 in N2 by setting the temperature to 850
°C. The catalyst was then cooled down by setting the temperature
to 800 °C, and after switching to the DMR gas mixture (7% CH4 & 9.5% CO2 in N2), the DMR activity
was measured on stream for 15 h. The degree of CH4 and
CO2 conversion after 2 h stabilized at 86 and 77%, respectively
(Figure ). In addition,
the yields for H2 and CO were calculated using eq S1 and corresponded to ∼78 and ∼80%,
respectively. The activity of the NiCoO/γ-Al2O3DMR catalyst in terms of CH4 conversion is of
the same order of magnitude as that exhibited by bimetallic NiCo catalysts
in the literature (75–90%), which was found to exceed that
of monometallic Ni or Co DRM catalysts (<70%).[21,35,36] These findings hint to the synergistic effect
between Ni and Co in the bimetallic NiCo DMR catalyst. Furthermore, Figure S7 and Table S1 show, respectively, the
activity measurement results and corresponding conversion/yield values,
after exposing the catalyst to DMR conditions for 15 h.
Figure 4
Activity measurements
for the NiCoO/γ-Al2O3 DMR catalyst (conversion/yield
fractions during the DMR experiment
under 7% CH4 and 9.5% CO2 in N2 and
a flow rate of 490 mL min–1). Due to the configuration
of the setup and the endothermicity of the DMR reaction, the oven
temperature was set to 800 °C to achieve a temperature of ∼750
°C at the center of the bed. Prior to the DMR activity measurements,
the catalyst was treated for 30 min under 10% H2 in N2 with a flow rate of 100 mL min–1.
Activity measurements
for the NiCoO/γ-Al2O3DMR catalyst (conversion/yield
fractions during the DMR experiment
under 7% CH4 and 9.5% CO2 in N2 and
a flow rate of 490 mL min–1). Due to the configuration
of the setup and the endothermicity of the DMR reaction, the oven
temperature was set to 800 °C to achieve a temperature of ∼750
°C at the center of the bed. Prior to the DMR activity measurements,
the catalyst was treated for 30 min under 10% H2 in N2 with a flow rate of 100 mL min–1.For the STXM measurements,
the X-ray transmission
signal of a selected particle was acquired at both Ni (in green)
and Co (in violet) L-edges for (I) the freshly calcined sample, (II)
during reduction with 5% H2 in Ar, and (III) through the
DMR process under 7% CH4 and 9.5% CO2 in N2. Figure S8 illustrates that multiple
particles were investigated to confirm the reproducibility of the
in situ STXM results. The average lateral dimensions and thicknesses
of the selected calcined catalyst particles were in the order of 0.4–1.2
μm and 0.2–0.3 μm, respectively. Each of the spectral
elemental images were obtained by subtracting the pre-edge spectral
elemental map from that obtained at the L3-edge maximum.
The elemental composition maps presented in Figure a–c are collected from an identical
spot. Furthermore, the corresponding Co and Ni L3-edge
XAS spectra are shown in Figure . For the sake of comparison, L3-edge XAS
spectra of the metallic Ni and Co oxides are also included in Figure .
Figure 5
(a) Co L3-edge
spectrum of the NiCoO/γ-Al2O3 sample collected
under operating conditions.
The L3-edge of the calcined catalyst has the same shape
and energy position when compared to Co3O4.
Under reducing conditions at 500 °C, the Co3O4-like compound is converted into metallic Co. (b) Collection
of Ni L3-edge spectra of the fresh catalyst having the
same shape and energy position if compared to NiO. Under DMR conditions,
both the Ni and Co stay reduced.
(a) Co L3-edge
spectrum of the NiCoO/γ-Al2O3 sample collected
under operating conditions.
The L3-edge of the calcined catalyst has the same shape
and energy position when compared to Co3O4.
Under reducing conditions at 500 °C, the Co3O4-like compound is converted into metallic Co. (b) Collection
of Ni L3-edge spectra of the fresh catalyst having the
same shape and energy position if compared to NiO. Under DMR conditions,
both the Ni and Co stay reduced.In general, the elemental composition maps for the freshly calcined
sample (Figure a)
show a rather inhomogeneous distribution of Ni and Co on the γ-Al2O3 support. This observation is further supported
by the individual elemental composition maps of Co and Ni acquired
for the same calcined particle (Figure S9). There are, however, some Ni-rich regions in the calcined catalyst,
consistent with the corresponding STEM-EDX data (Figure ). Based on a comparison with
reference spectra, the formation of Co3O4 (2xCo3+ O and 1xCo2+ T) and NiO
(Ni2+ O) species, as a result
of the calcination process, is confirmed as reported in other studies.[24,59]Next, the catalyst was activated by increasing the temperature
stepwise from 25 °C to 750 °C under a continuous 5% H2 in Ar flow. In order to accelerate the reduction process,
the pressure was set to 3.0 bar. The corresponding Co and Ni L3-edges are shown in Figure and Figures S10 and S11. At the initiation of the reduction step, the pressure was increased
to 3.0 bar to accelerate the reduction process. At 250 °C, the
Ni L3-edge remains essentially unaffected, indicating that Ni2+ is still present. However, the Co L3-edge has
changed quite significantly both in the multiplet structure and in
the average energy. The observed changes are consistent with the reduction
of the Co3+ O sites to most
probably octahedrally coordinated Co2+ oxide. These results
are in agreement with the TPR data (Figure S6) and with literature studies, where the partial reduction of Co3O4 was found to occur at a relatively lower temperature
compared with the Ni site.[60,61] The most prominent
changes in the L-edge spectra are observed at 500 °C. At this
temperature, the shift in both Co and Ni L3-edges together
with the resulting spectral shape indicates the full reduction of
the metal oxides to their metallic state. This result is again consistent
with the measured TPR profiles (see Figure S6). Furthermore, Figure b shows that at 500 °C, the morphology and elemental distribution
of the NiCo particle are altered. The formation of voids within the
particle can be seen, which may be a result of restructuring upon
loss of oxygen from the lattice under reducing conditions.[62,63]Figure S2 reveals that increasing the
reduction pressure to 3.0 bar at 500 °C results in a minor decrease
in the particle size.In the second phase of the reduction process,
performed at 750
°C, both the Co and Ni L3-edges remain unchanged relative
to the data acquired at 500 °C (Figure ), thus supporting the full conversion of
the metal oxides at 500 °C into their metallic species. However,
the elemental composition maps shown in Figure c display a rather dramatic change in the
elemental distribution of the active phase with Co migrating inward
and a Ni-rich shell forming on the surface of the large agglomerate.
The elemental composition maps shown in Figure and Figure S12 show that in this step, the formed structure consists of two parts:
(I) the surface, made of only Ni, and (II) the core, consisting of
both Co and Ni. This demonstrates the increase in surface mobility
of Ni and Co at high temperature and under 5%H2 in Ar flow. Figure S2 shows that increasing the pressure
from 1.5 to 3.0 bar only slightly influences the particle morphology,
with this becoming slightly more spherical. While previous studies
have suggested that alloy formation between Ni and Co is key to optimizing
the DMR activity and stability,[29,37,64,65] for the system under study, we
show that elemental segregation to form a Ni-rich surface is involved
in the activation of the catalyst. We note that previous in situ XPS
studies by Wu et al.[37] of a related NiCo
catalyst, obtained by the wet impregnation method, indicated that
Co migrates inward during the reduction of NiCo. Further they showed that
upon the completion of reduction, the surface of the nanoparticle
is a 50:50 mixture of Co and Ni.[37] However,
due to the intrinsic differences between our catalyst and that studied
by Wu, such comparisons must be made with caution. Regardless, these
results highlight the power of spectromicroscopy for identifying morphological,
structural and element distribution changes in nanoparticles during
operating conditions.Finally, under DMR reaction conditions,
we focused on another NiCo
particle with much smaller dimensions in order to precisely follow
the changes in morphology and in the elemental distribution. Herein,
elemental composition maps and L3-edge XAS spectra were
obtained during the DMR reaction at 750 °C under 7% CH4 and 9.5% CO2 in N2 at (I) 1 minute and (II)
120 min exposure time. The data collected after 1 min exposure to
the DMR conditions clearly indicate that the segregated structure
is preserved (Figure b) and that both Ni and Co remain fully reduced based on the L3-edge spectra (Figure ). Furthermore, Figure a,b reveals that changing the pressure from 3.0 to 1.0 bar
does not influence the particle morphology and size. However, a closer
inspection of Figure b reveals that in for the large NiCo particle, the Ni concentration
has increased in certain locations on the surface, as indicated with
red arrows. After 120 min under DMR conditions, the Ni and Co are
still reduced, as seen from the L-edges but the formation of Ni-rich
branches at the surface of the particle is observed (Figure c). This unexpected event may
be associated with the growth of filamentous carbon on the surface
of the catalytically active sites.[66,67] This result
is consistent with that of Takanabe et al. where it was demonstrated
that carbonaceous species are removed at a slower rate on pure Ni
surfaces, which ultimately leads to deactivation due to carbon deposition.[34]
Conclusions
In summary, we have
successfully developed a modified route for
the controlled synthesis of a NiCo catalyst with high activity and
stability toward the DMR reaction. Importantly, the synthesis procedure
produced large particles, which are amenable to studies by STXM. In
situ STXM measurements show that while in the calcined form, the particles
exhibit an inhomogeneous distribution of Ni and Co, and during the
reductive activation step at 750 °C (5% H2/Ar), a
clear elemental segregation is observed; with Co migrating toward
the center of the agglomerated nanoparticles and Ni forming a shell
on the outer surface of the particle. The segregated structure is
preserved during DMR, suggesting that Ni is the primary active site,
while the more readily oxidized Co may serve as an electron donor
to Ni during catalysis. The dynamics of morphology and elemental distribution
of the nanoparticle highlights a mechanism by which the synergistic
interaction between the metals is optimized to maximize catalytic
activity and minimize coking.[68]This
study highlights the ability of in situ STXM to monitor the
evolution of particle morphology, elemental distribution, and electronic
structure under operating conditions. In this respect, the employed
in situ setup represents a major technological advancement, as it
enables the types of industrially relevant processes that can be studied
with STXM to be greatly expanded. As such, we are convinced that this
method development, by providing a means to evaluate catalytic mechanisms
and deactivation processes, will enable important advances in the
understanding of heterogeneous catalytic processes in general. We
thus believe that in the future, in situ STXM will provide important
contributions toward knowledge-based catalytic design.
Authors: Sophie Carenco; Cheng-Hao Wu; Andrey Shavorskiy; Selim Alayoglu; Gabor A Somorjai; Hendrik Bluhm; Miquel Salmeron Journal: Small Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: J Raabe; G Tzvetkov; U Flechsig; M Böge; A Jaggi; B Sarafimov; M G C Vernooij; T Huthwelker; H Ade; D Kilcoyne; T Tyliszczak; R H Fink; C Quitmann Journal: Rev Sci Instrum Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 1.523
Authors: Tigran Margossian; Kim Larmier; Sung Min Kim; Frank Krumeich; Alexey Fedorov; Peter Chen; Christoph R Müller; Christophe Copéret Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: S B Vendelbo; C F Elkjær; H Falsig; I Puspitasari; P Dona; L Mele; B Morana; B J Nelissen; R van Rijn; J F Creemer; P J Kooyman; S Helveg Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2014-07-20 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Ilse K van Ravenhorst; Charlotte Vogt; Heiko Oosterbeek; Koen W Bossers; José G Moya-Cancino; Alexander P van Bavel; Ad M J van der Eerden; David Vine; Frank M F de Groot; Florian Meirer; Bert M Weckhuysen Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Mustafa Al Samarai; Anselm W Hahn; Abbas Beheshti Askari; Yi-Tao Cui; Kosuke Yamazoe; Jun Miyawaki; Yoshihisa Harada; Olaf Rüdiger; Serena DeBeer Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 9.229